Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
No it doesn’t because your “point” is based entirely on hypothetics and not facts.
Should’ve, would’ve, could’ve are totally meaningless in regards to what happened in this case.
The fact, and the only fact that matters, is that he died whilst being 100% in the care of the police.
It may have been quite possible that the police did nothing wrong to cause his death whilst he was in their custody.
That question has been answered in a court.
It really is that simple.
|
Well it does though doesn't it. If he hadn't of choose a criminal lifestyle, he'd most likely still be alive. That's a very major talking point in the argument. He died in the hands of Police care, because of his previous actions that put him where he was in life.
---------- Post added at 20:42 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
And nobody in either circumstance, in a civilised society, should be murdered by the police.
|
And nobody, in a civilised society should be a criminal.