Thread: TiVo Sky Q and VM answer ?
View Single Post
Old 04-02-2016, 11:24   #98
Stuart
-
 
Stuart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Stuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver blingStuart has a lot of silver bling
Re: Sky Q and VM answer????

Quote:
Originally Posted by hedgie View Post
1-For me and many others suffering cripplingly bad connections due to overselling, poor network planning and under capacity the broadband is an unreliable second rate product. Their headline speeds are now so far beyond what most users actually need it doesn't matter if Sky or BT are slower, they are fast enough. So the BB advantage is being eroded anyway
Depends how many people live in the home. 200 meg divided amongst four people is noticably slower than 80 meg used by one (assuming they are all using BB)
Quote:
2- The interface on the Sky+ was always better, more intuitive and faster than TiVO
Each to their own, but I disagree. I always found the Sky + to be one of the most user unfriendly peices of kit I have used.
Quote:
3 - Maybe it's just me but Sky Go seems way better than TV Anywhere
Can't really comment as I haven't used Sky Go. But, TV anywhere needs a lot of work IMO.
Quote:
4 - VM have no real version of sky store with Free DVD's.
Is that *really* a selling point when Amazon have a far wider selection of DVDs and Blu Rays available than Sky, a lot of which can also be streamed via Ultraviolet?
Quote:
Sorry but it needs to improve, and fast.
Agreed.
Stuart is offline   Reply With Quote