Quote:
Originally Posted by jarrodstrachan
if you are using the VMNG300, they are compatible.. I think
|
There's no issue of "compatability". It's about throughput and load-balancing.
The VMNG300 can do 4 downstream channels maximum, so theoretically 200Mb.
However some areas have been upgraded to 6 or 8 downstream channels to distribute the load better between the channels. In those areas, being stuck on 4 channels might only give 85 or 105Mb or whatever. You'd only know once you try.
---------- Post added at 16:31 ---------- Previous post was at 16:26 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Max
A quick question for the technically minded guys out there, i am on the 100Mb at the moment, i didn't bother to take up the 120Mb option when it was offered as it meant having to get the new superhub, the reason i didn't bother was because there were all sorts of reports saying that the superhub was basically rubbish, can anyone tell me if the superhub has had a software update, and therefore all the teething problems that were there at the start have gone or not?
|
In modem mode both Superhubs are good. Better than the VMNG300 as they have 8 downstream channels and 4 upstream channels to distribute the load better.
Wifi wise the Superhub1 is still poor (because that's a hardware antenna issue), the Superhub2 is ok.
If you're using your own wireless router you probably won't notice any difference, except for the increased speed.