View Single Post
Old 23-08-2013, 11:40   #57
ethan103
Inactive
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Manchester
Services: VM350, Sky Q Silver.
Posts: 410
ethan103 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Playstation 4 partnering with Virgin Media and 200mbit speeds this year?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
Microsoft has 300,000 servers for their entire Azure platform. That includes EVERYTHING, from Xbox Live to even windows update, as well as all of the azure services that you can buy and rent. It's not 300,000 just for Xbox Live. Don't know where you got the 20,000 Sony servers from, so I can't comment.


nope, it's 300,000 for Xbox One as stated here:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/20...velopers-think



Why will Sony have to concentrate them while Microsoft can distribute them around the world? What's your basis for this statement and why are Microsoft so special? Don't get me wrong, Azure is huge and sure has its advantages but I think you're overestimating things a bit here. That said, Microsoft has a better track record with this stuff.

because as MS has over 10x the severs they can spread them out more evenly around the world whereas SONY cannot, as logic would tell you they have fewer.


Why have you just compared the RRP for PS+ against the ebay price of Xbox Live? I've seen PS+ go for similar amounts to Xbox Live, the difference in price isn't anywhere near what you're making it out to be. PS+ does work out a little more expensive in general, but it's more like £5 per year more, not £15. And the games you get on PS+ have been historically better than the ones Microsoft has been giving out with Gold lately.

From my experience PSN+ and PSN cards are harder to get at a discount than XBL Points are and XBL Gold is.

Also I would disagree and say both companies haven't really offered any good games for free that aren't really old or I haven't already tried. I personally don't see the benefits of PS+.




Agreed. Live is a better service than PSN.

At least we agree here.


He hasn't given an answer one way or the other (I suspect that Sony is currently working on something they haven't announced yet). Even if CoD doesn't have dedicated servers on PS4 (Doesn't look like it'll have them on 360, either), that doesn't mean other games won't have them. The point is that both services are capable of using dedicated servers.

EDIT: http://www.polygon.com/2013/6/12/442...g-calculations

Like I said SONY will be more stretched with offer a quality server experience. Just because they have them dosent mean they will be close or located in the UK especially when they have 20K-30K compared to MS with 300K for the Xbox One.

And of course having severs on the most played MP game on console is a massive plus and MS will, it looks like, support many more games with them.

As regards to your article,

That just states PS4 will sometime in 2014 offer some graphics streaming/processes via the cloud.

Again they may not be able to match MS and their quality and it isn't a 'day 1' feature.
ethan103 is offline   Reply With Quote