View Single Post
Old 20-01-2013, 15:42   #28
Superblade7
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sheffield
Services: Sky Q 2TB & Sky Q Mini (Box Sets with Cinema & Sports HD) with VM VIVID 100Mbps Broadband & M Phone
Posts: 582
Superblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond reputeSuperblade7 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Channel renumbering - your views.

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant View Post
Users used to be able to move channels. It was a nightmare. People would forget where they had put them, or one member of the family would move channels confusing everyone else.

I can think of two reasons not to group by broadcaster. People expect channels 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 to be together at the start. I can't see ITV being happy at being after the 36 BBC channels. Also, what happens if a channel is sold to a new owner?


There used to be sports pay-per-view channels in that range.

501 PremPlus
502 PremPlus2
504 PPV Events
505 PPV Events 2
Think channels 101-5 should always be BBC One to Channel 5 but after that they should group ITV, BBC, etc.

PremPlus was many years ago MM so I defo think the sports channels should start on 501 with Sky Sports 1.
Superblade7 is offline   Reply With Quote