Thread: Superhub Superhub 2
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2013, 11:03   #64
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
Re: Superhub 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
This is very true and you make an excellent point. I would still say that anyone comparing it to JUST a modem though is missing the point a bit but you're right that it shouldn't be that way.
Part of my objection is if I'm going to have to use it as a standalone modem, I'd rather just be given a standalone modem to begin with. I'm forced to take a router, so it has to be compared to a router. I'd rather they just gave me a SACM like they used to, then I'd be happy to compare it to a modem. But the fact is, it isn't. This applies equally to any successor VM are rumored to be bringing out.

Principally if I get given a piece of kit where I'm going to turn off 80% of the components of, then frankly it'd been cheaper for everybody to have the option of leaving them out to begin with.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote