View Single Post
Old 17-01-2012, 19:40   #120
qasdfdsaq
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,207
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
qasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronzeqasdfdsaq is cast in bronze
re: MAJOR NETWORK ISSUE (17 Jan 2012)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Digital Fanatic View Post
Not really, you can't have 4 million support staff sitting waiting for your call or capacity for that much traffic to a single webpage.

Thankfully issues like this are rare. Something like this will be a CSO (Critical Service Outage) and tend to be resolved with a few hours.
Yes but a simple "If you are calling about the current service outage, we're aware of it already" would massively reduce the number of support staff required.

And a lot of sites have a "backup" high volume, low complexity system for reporting major outages - e.g. reverting to a single line of text instead of failing completely.

Having a contingency plan to deal with major outages is all part of being a major service provider.

---------- Post added at 20:40 ---------- Previous post was at 20:39 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ View Post
Thank the Lord for Cable Forum
Actually I was getting a "Site too busy" response from Cable Forum most of the time while VM's own forums were slow, but functional.
qasdfdsaq is offline   Reply With Quote