Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
The post to which you replied said about the adblock plug in for IE costing money for IE9
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
but that people pay for Open source software? If Chrysalis was willing to pay for software for another browser, do you not think he would just buy the plug in for IE?
|
Well isn't Adblocker based off open sourced software in the first place (source code), produced for FF/others first off, now a downloadable App for IE, you have to pay - sounds fair. <quoting previous posting>
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart
Something which, let's face, it, it's not in Microsoft's interest to do.
|
Wouldn't that make the utter drivel IE9 much more appealing to users for other browsers uses? wouldn't you agree stuart?; MS won't see this, as they dig a deeper hole to climb out of from everywhere they release a new piece of software besides still continue to push most of their lame software even now..
Lets be frank here; Ms started out good in the days of 3.1, then win 95/98 then till windows xp 7 now windows 7 in-between them times, no thing new or earth moving, just like a stale mouldy loaf of bread rotting away waiting till for the next unwrapped loaf to placed next to it.
Where as open software, has moved on leaps & bounds, first free downloadable office software, matching MS own over rip-off priced office package, then O/S software to browser Apps...closed software is never going to work now days with free open software available ready to download & work straight from the first click.
I hope this helps your inquiry Sir Stuart, also nice talking to you again.... as always
You have a view, let us all hear it good or bad
God bless>toonlight