Quote:
Originally Posted by roughbeast
I disagree. I have never had a result above 34Mb on TBB either with my 50Mb or trial 200Mb connection. Usually it is far less. (Don't ask for more details, 'cos I ain't telling. We all know the trials exists don't we.)
TBB acknowledge that there are issues with the VM network and their test servers.
eg
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/fib...eed-tests.html
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/tbb...the-creek.html
Here is a TBB test result done just now on my 200Mb connection. It is way, way, way below what I get on the reliable trial test server. (Can't show you that either.) The up speed result is also inaccurate.

|
I said that the TBB tester could handle 200Mbps and upwards without issues - there's nothing they can do if there's insufficient capacity between them and VM. The issues with the TBB tester and VM customers are due to a lack of bandwidth on the VM side of the link to TBB. This doesn't just affect TBB it's actually to one of the LINX LANs.
In the items you copy/pasted you'll note that it's clearly stated the issues are with VM, not TBB....
Quote:
|
VM has some routing issues to our servers, it has been pointed out to them, but looks like they've not implemented the fix yet
|
Quote:
|
There are some known congestion issues with one ISP and the route often used to reach us, it is beyond our control, but we did investigate and report a solution they could use.
|
Guess who the ISP is?
Also the guy on the Post Office service's issue with the tester was transient - TBB did nothing and it fixed itself. Probably a problem on the BT Wholesale network.
If you're on the 20 or 50Mbit variations of the 200M trial I can also easily believe that there are inaccuracies upstream - to get an accurate upstream speed requires a reasonably functional downstream path.