View Single Post
Old 18-05-2010, 14:41   #653
Xaccers
Inactive
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Xaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny starsXaccers has a pair of shiny stars
Re: Ban the burkha ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek S View Post
Has there been any instances of people suing or similar because some people have demanded that forms of face covering are removed?

If there hasn't been then surely all that needs to happen is for check-in staff, passport control etc. to grow a pair and demand that where its necessary for ID to be confirmed or faces to be seen that anything obscuring that is removed.
My understanding is that security staff should ask for any face covering to be removed, and if requested, a private room and female member of staff is available (to confirm identity, nothing else, before MLM see's this).
As with any security system, if the people running can't be bothered, then checks won't take place, and as demonstrated by the reporter who travelled on other people's passports, you don't have to cover your face to get through in that situation.


The only search related complaints which spring to mind are Diana Ross, and that poor woman in the US who was forced to use pliers to remove her nipple piercings behind a screen in the main security area, while the male security officers giggled like little school boys.
Xaccers is offline   Reply With Quote