Thread: Pace v Samsung
View Single Post
Old 06-05-2008, 09:09   #4
Mick Fisher
Inactive
 
Mick Fisher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Northants
Age: 82
Services: Sky Unlimited FibrePro Sky Talk Sky+HD
Posts: 5,122
Mick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze array
Mick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze arrayMick Fisher has a bronze array
Re: Pace v Samsung

Quote:
Originally Posted by huxleypiguk View Post
I am now on my second Pace box which hangs more or less every night and need rebooting in the morning. Everything else works fine, On Demand, Interactive, audio etc, but this is now a pain.

I am going to get VM out to change the box and am thinking of insisting of having a Samsung instead.

Does anyone have any experience of Pace v Samsung re speed, reliability etc
Pace v Samsung, as far as my experience, very little difference. Both needed rebooting every day, both crashed just as much.
If pushed I would have to say that the Pace was just a little less crappier than the Samsung. Neither box is up to the job IMO.
Mick Fisher is offline   Reply With Quote