Quote:
Originally Posted by 80/20Thinking
Thank you for the primer on InfoEthics 1.0.1
However I wouldn't go around publishing presumptions about my priorities with regard to stakeholderage. You may end up feeling sheepish.
Simon
|
Sorry. I was trying to return to a bit of constructive debate, and overlook the recent events because people tell me to trust you.
Sheepish? I doubt it.
I'd be delighted to find your report considers the priorities of web creators. So far you haven't mentioned the interests of content providers in your documents. Your initial PIA 'Consent and Participation' completely overlooked the interests of content creators.
Phorm seem to believe this method of conducting business has limitless boundaries on the content side. All content can be stolen without regard to the interests of content creators. I think Phorm will find it has surprisingly firm boundaries, technical, commercial, and legal.
Sheepish? I just hope you're not trying to pull the wool over my eyes like K*nt. I certainly won't be around when the sheep hits the fan. Shear determination will see Phorm off.
Otherwise its content creators who get fleeced... That's baad news for everyone.
Pete