Quote:
Originally Posted by RizzyKing
That's what always bothered me about this everyone's initial reaction seems to have been "she's been abducted". If i left a four year old sleeping in an apartment and went back at some point and she wasn't there first thing that would come to me was that she had woken up and gone looking for me. Not so the mc'canns who right from the getgo knew she had been abducted. The fact that all these friends that were there can't seem to get thier stories straight also puzzles me. I think there is a hell of a lot we don't know about this and for that reason we shouldn't say oneway or the other who or what happened to the little girl.
|
They claim that they know that she'd been abducted because the 'cuddle cat' that she was sleeping with had been put on a shelf or something high up out of Madeline's reach. Pretty weird thing to do if true, but the whole thing is pretty strange.
I found it very unsettling when Gerry McCann tried to suggest that the abductor may have drugged the children in the Panorama documentary. That seems so ridiculous (presumably the abductor would have done it to prevent the children making any noise, but if he could get access to drug them quietly then why niot take them at the same time?) that it really felt like he was trying to cover himself in case any evidence of sedatives is ever found.