Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713507)

Jaymoss 14-09-2025 22:18

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
If you are going to jail someone for incitement in text form ie X then imo Joe Brand if she did say something about throwing acid on him is equally as guilty of incitement even if it was a joke and as she has more of a following than Lucy Connolly she is even more guilty imo . Hate is hate throwing in race should not make it any worse an offense it is unbalanced

If some white moron decides to beat me to death I can rest in peace easy knowing its not as bad as someone from a different race doing it

Dude111 14-09-2025 22:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris
As Kirk was something of a free speech absolutist I doubt he’d approve of doxxing people and getting them fired in the way that website seeks to.

You might be right..... That may be stepping over the line!! (As this country does alot)

Thanx for removiing the link,I didnt mean any harm by it.......

Damien 14-09-2025 22:32

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaymoss (Post 36202744)
If you are going to jail someone for incitement in text form ie X then imo Joe Brand if she did say something about throwing acid on him is equally as guilty of incitement even if it was a joke and as she has more of a following than Lucy Connolly she is even more guilty imo . Hate is hate throwing in race should not make it any worse an offense it is unbalanced

If some white moron decides to beat me to death I can rest in peace easy knowing its not as bad as someone from a different race doing it

Brand was clearly joking, though. It would be impossible to miss from the full context.

But I also think Connolly fell short of needing a conviction, albeit it was a horrible tweet.

I am not a free speech absolutist. I think if someone is advocating violence against someone seriously, they should be arrested. Someone at the far-right march said that of Starmer, and I don't know why he wasn't arrested for advocating violence against a politican.

Pierre 15-09-2025 13:26

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36202747)
Brand was clearly joking, though. It would be impossible to miss from the full context.

But I also think Connolly fell short of needing a conviction, albeit it was a horrible tweet.

I am not a free speech absolutist. I think if someone is advocating violence against someone seriously, they should be arrested. Someone at the far-right march said that of Starmer, and I don't know why he wasn't arrested for advocating violence against a politican.

It just shows why hate speech laws are a mess, and should be removed and re-thought.

the very term "hate speech" is too broad. Why can't I say something hateful?

You can't legislate away emotions.

1andrew1 16-09-2025 00:10

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36202761)
It just shows why hate speech laws are a mess, and should be removed and re-thought.

the very term "hate speech" is too broad. Why can't I say something hateful?

You can't legislate away emotions.

A good article here about the law around it and why Musk did not break it but someone calling for Starmer to be killed did break the law.

A key point is whether inflammatory speech carries the threat of provoking “immediate unlawful violence" This is the threshold set by Parliament that such speech must cross to constitute criminality.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-break-the-law

Chris 16-09-2025 00:42

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36202804)
A good article here about the law around it and why Musk did not break it but someone calling for Starmer to be killed did break the law.

A key point is whether inflammatory speech carries the threat of provoking “immediate unlawful violence" This is the threshold set by Parliament that such speech must cross to constitute criminality.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-break-the-law

Anyone know off-hand what the actual legal status of the term “hate speech” is - does it have a legal basis or is it shorthand for something legislation describes differently?

Paul 16-09-2025 01:13

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
Well I guess you can do the same search as me ...
Quote:

No, "hate speech" does not have a single, specific legal definition in the UK, but rather several laws address specific acts that are considered hate crimes or offenses.
Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_s...United_Kingdom

Chris 16-09-2025 08:27

Re: Charlie Kirk (US conservative campaigner) shot dead
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36202807)
Well I guess you can do the same search as me ...


Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_s...United_Kingdom

I’d rather leave that to the overnight staff when I have these thoughts just as I’m getting into bed ;)


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum