![]() |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Downquark1: While the British had the easier job (probably why the US gave it to us), it's basically army policies that separate why the British forces are better recieved than the American ones. I know one key thing i've read about is that America relies very much on technology (satelites, spy planes, etc), however the British have always relied on ground intelligence. Like meeting tribal elders, giving them incentives and getting good quality information back. This creates a better feeling among the people, than cutting them out the loop. But that is not the case totally though. America's reputation is so bad that I don't really think they anything they do to win hearts and minds would work.
Apparently though, i've just heard that some British soldiers (2 I think) are in trouble over alledged photographs. One was of a guy urinating on a prisoner. I can't remember what the other one was. It is in tomorrow's Mirror.. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3675215.stm :( |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Quote:
:( |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Taken from downquark1's link:
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Apparently the media is putting troops in extra danger by reporting this.
Fox new's top spin man Here's an idea why not blame those soldiers for doing it, the media hasn't just invented this. |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Well it's interesting to note that there is now some talk of the US troops being requested to perform these acts on the Iraqi prisoners in preparation for interrogation, which is what I was saying yesterday.
Like I said I don't necessarily agree with their actions, but surely this does put a different take on matters. |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Quote:
But let's face it, that's all spin and BS in an attempt to try and claw back from the position the army currently finds itself in. Here's a little logical problem for you to try out. You say that the troops had been requested to perform these acts. One of the soldiers involved has gone on record to say that the reason that they had performed these acts is because they had *no* instructions from their superior, so they were too retarded to realise that this was not an acceptable course of action (what they were doing in the army in the first place I don`t know, I wouldn`t trust them to flip a burger). There would seem to be a discrepancy between the various stories being thrown around. |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
I've seen one or two reports (in the Guardian, mainly, which is why I'm taking it with a pinch of salt for now) that US Military Intelligence was behind the mistreatment of prisoners, which is why the Army and Bush are pushing the 'few bad eggs doing it of their own accord' thing - presumably a few thugs will be hung out to dry but the real people behind it will be quietly moved.
Remember that Gen. Jackson was heavily involved on Bloody Sunday (second-in-command in fact), which goes to show that you can make a damn good Army career out of being a 'disgrace to the Queen's uniform'. |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
investigate
hold a televised court marshal kick the guilty out of the forces totally dishonoured broadcast it all on al jezera to show that we find this totally unacceptable and will deal with such things in a serious manner get bush and blair to appologise to the iraqi people for the soldiers action, reiterating that we will not stand for such behaviour |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
I know that things like that normally can go on in the course of trying to do what's best, but I don't think it is the case here. I think it's a few soldiers having a sick joke. I know that in jobs of high stress (police, fire service) sick jokes normally help the people deal with the stress of it all, so some people may forgive them for that, but i'm not so sure... Doing it is one thing, but photographing it for your mates and sharing it round? That's too far. Even if the soldiers were ordered to do it by a superior, i'm sure they wern't ordered to photograph it. Which leads me to an interesting question:
Given the damage caused by the photos, and the trouble it is going to cause for everyone, do you think it is right the press released them? |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
After seeing some of these image's I was thinking to myself something looks odd. I've just watched it again on Skynews and someone mentioned that they looked staged. Now they also stated that they think someone from the QLR regiment sent these picture's in. Has anyone thought that these could have been staged here though. I know I can go to Manchester city centre and buy British Army Desert Combats and Boots. None of the people that were supposed to be getting tortured were shown either?. If it were staged that may give the whole thing away though don't you think !
Just something to think about |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
are the soldiers faces shown?
if so it will be easy to prove its a fake |
Re: MERGED - Prisoner Abuse
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:29. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum