Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

Just which IP address has changed the one you get off the internet
can you please do another test for me.

Go to start click on runthen command or cmd for windows 2kwhen the dos window opens type ipconfig all
you should then get a list of all IP numbers like this;

Just edited to add I have now a speed problem in Manchester just taken this speed test I should be on 750K.

Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:02:14 GMT
1st 128K took 10876 ms = 12051 Bytes/sec = approx 100 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 10455 ms = 12537 Bytes/sec = approx 104 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 7912 ms = 16566 Bytes/sec = approx 138 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 7831 ms = 16738 Bytes/sec = approx 139 kbits/sec


:Yikes: thats slow no wonder the pages are either not opening or opening slow.

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

all seems OK on the south side (baguley proxys)

Sun, 3 Oct 2004 00:04:07 UTC
1st 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1063 ms = 123304 Bytes/sec = approx 1026 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1063 ms = 123304 Bytes/sec = approx 1026 kbits/sec

yep 1.5 through a sammy (still no nice new .cm file)

and a trace thru to this site

Tracing route to cableforum.co.uk [66.199.235.18]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

hops 1 & 2 removed
3 <10 ms 15 ms <10 ms bagu-t2cam1-b-ge-wan53-124.inet.ntl.com [80.5.162.225]
4 16 ms <10 ms 15 ms bagu-t2core-b-ge-wan61.inet.ntl.com [80.5.161.129]
5 <10 ms 15 ms 16 ms lee-bb-b-so-300-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.188.29]
6 15 ms 16 ms 15 ms lee-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.185]
7 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]
8 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms tele-ic-1-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.82]
9 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms linx.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [195.66.224.94]
10 94 ms 78 ms 78 ms 0.ge-6-2-0.gbr2.nyc.nac.net [209.123.11.181]
11 94 ms 78 ms 78 ms 94.gi4-2.esd1.nyc.nac.net [64.21.102.14]
12 78 ms 94 ms 78 ms 10.gi1-1.esd1.tlw.nac.net [209.123.11.230]
13 78 ms 94 ms 94 ms ezzi-2.customer.tlw.nac.net [207.99.110.174]
14 79 ms 93 ms 94 ms 65.125.239.146
15 93 ms 94 ms 94 ms phoenix.cableforum.co.uk [66.199.235.18]
Trace Complete.

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

Now its the early hours its back to normal but weird how it suddenlly started to slow down.

Sun, 03 Oct 2004 00:39:56 GMT
1st 128K took 1452 ms = 90270 Bytes/sec = approx 751 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1452 ms = 90270 Bytes/sec = approx 751 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1462 ms = 89653 Bytes/sec = approx 746 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1452 ms = 90270 Bytes/sec = approx 751 kbits/sec



and tracert

Tracing route to cableforum.co.uk [66.199.235.18]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms *********
2 <10 ms 10 ms 10 ms *********
3 10 ms 10 ms <10 ms oldh-t2cam1-a-ge-wan51-120.inet.ntl.com [80.5.16
4.81]
4 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms mant-t2core-a-ge-wan62.inet.ntl.com [213.104.242
.41]
5 10 ms <10 ms 10 ms man-bb-a-so-230-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.184.57]
6 20 ms 10 ms 10 ms lee-bb-b-so-700-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.194]

7 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms lee-bb-a-ae0-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.187.185]
8 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms pop-bb-b-so-100-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.238]

9 10 ms 20 ms 10 ms tele-ic-1-so-000-0.inet.ntl.com [62.253.185.82]

10 10 ms 21 ms 10 ms linx.ge-0-0-0.gbr1.ltn.nac.net [195.66.224.94]
11 91 ms 80 ms 80 ms 0.ge-6-2-0.gbr2.nyc.nac.net [209.123.11.181]
12 80 ms 80 ms 90 ms 94.gi4-2.esd1.nyc.nac.net [64.21.102.14]
13 90 ms 80 ms 90 ms 10.gi1-1.esd1.tlw.nac.net [209.123.11.230]
14 91 ms 90 ms 90 ms ezzi-2.customer.tlw.nac.net [207.99.110.174]
15 91 ms 90 ms 80 ms 65.125.239.146
16 90 ms 90 ms 90 ms phoenix.cableforum.co.uk [66.199.235.18]

Trace complete.

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

:D your edit time OTA says it all Kits,

Last edited by Kits : Yesterday at 23:07,

probably all the local chavs getting in and logging on to get their nightly download of pr0n :rolleyes:

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

was in work last night so wasn't sure wether it was ok or not but now seems ok again
off to bed wonder what ill happen later

Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-**-5A-79-**-**
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.***.0.* this one changed for me yesterday morn had a 0 instead of 1
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 194.168.4.100

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

:erm: I hope its not going to be this every night. It makes surfing difficult I want my speed back that was great after the network was sorted out after the AMPs died...

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

Kits,

Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-**-5A-79-**-**
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.***.0.*
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1

No need to censor the second pairing in the MAC address, that is part of the manufacturer's prefix and is the same for all equipment made by that company most likely.

Nor is there any need to censor any of your private IP address, there's only the one private range in the 192 group and what you are using is given away somewhat by your default gateway, not that this is a security issue really. To exploit based on your inside IP is hard.

Should save you a few seconds next time you do all that.

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

I live in Manchester and I had the same problem last night. Internet went offline every 3 minutes, had to keep repairing the connection. Fine today though.

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

well connection has been sound no probs just wonder how long it's gonna last

Re: Broadband connection problems in manchester
 

Don't wonder just enjoy the connection and worry when its down. :D