You are here: Home | Forum | Return of the cyclist scourge
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
I got quite used to the cyclists' traffic lights in the Netherlands. And the riders abided by them. N.B. don't go driving near any form of junction in the Netherlands if you have a weak heart. Cyclists often have priority and don't even bother looking to see what's coming.
Try crossing the main roads in Saigon - the traffic doesn’t stop, it just flows around you, and if you stop, you’ll get hit...
__________________ There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
Re: Return of the cyclist scourge
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
You are correct but with our challenges on road space and land ownership, expanding roads to include dedicated cycle lanes is a big ask.
What is needed is for Government (Local probably) to stand up to the Luddites and make brave road/urban space planning changes, like they made in Ghent:
However, at the end of the day, some people will just moan at anything. I mean, the Daily Mail built a whole comments section around this principle!
Er - surely the Luddites were opposed to new technology. Going back to bicycles fits the Luddite agenda!
You are correct but with our challenges on road space and land ownership, expanding roads to include dedicated cycle lanes is a big ask.
What is needed is for Government (Local probably) to stand up to the Luddites and make brave road/urban space planning changes, like they made in Ghent
Agreed. I recall suggesting on this forum some time ago that a radical re-think is needed. Perhaps a network of some B roads dedicated to cycle/pedestrian use. No solutions are easy but now is the time before gridlock and/or 20mph limits everywhere. No motorist wants that.
I like the Ghent approach; birthplace too of Sir Bradley Wiggins
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
Re: Return of the cyclist scourge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Agreed. I recall suggesting on this forum some time ago that a radical re-think is needed. Perhaps a network of some B roads dedicated to cycle/pedestrian use. No solutions are easy but now is the time before gridlock and/or 20mph limits everywhere. No motorist wants that.
I like the Ghent approach; birthplace too of Sir Bradley Wiggins
How would that work? All the B-roads round here have houses on them and thus people with cars, deliveries etc.
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
Re: Return of the cyclist scourge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
We’ve designed our lives and living spaces around the car. Perhaps start by making some more of these roads not through routes for motor vehicles?
This is your thread; you are unhappy with the current situation, so what do you think could work?
I suspect that you and I are at opposite ends of thinking on this matter.
We cannot or rather will not regress to non-motor transport methods particularly in rural areas where it's mile to the local supermarket.
Therefore, I don't think that anything other than what we have now will work better than it does now. Please remember that I started this thread as a complaint against die-hard cyclists clogging the roads (in my area) with some glee to the annoyance of car drivers going about their daily business.
My purpose in the thread was not to address commuting although discussion has morphed to some extent.
Services: Staff MyRates
BB: VM XXL
TV: VM XL
Phone : VM XL
Posts: 3,107
Re: Return of the cyclist scourge
Doesn't really matter what method of transport you are controlling roads are shared space and you need to be mindful to conditions and other road users. Just as motorists should give space to cyclists, allow for wobble or moving away from "obstructions" that would less affect cars and so on, cyclists need to allow for cars trying to get past and so on.
It should also be noted that roads are not race tracks. This applies to cyclists as well as motorists.
__________________
I work for VMO2 but reply here in my own right. Any help or advice is made on a best-effort basis. No comments construe any obligation on VMO2 or its employees.
I suspect that you and I are at opposite ends of thinking on this matter.
We cannot or rather will not regress to non-motor transport methods particularly in rural areas where it's mile to the local supermarket.
Therefore, I don't think that anything other than what we have now will work better than it does now. Please remember that I started this thread as a complaint against die-hard cyclists clogging the roads (in my area) with some glee to the annoyance of car drivers going about their daily business.
My purpose in the thread was not to address commuting although discussion has morphed to some extent.
Fair point. I don’t intend arguing this through to a standstill as has become the norm in Current Affairs.
But with all the brain power exhibited here, seldom are solutions to problems suggested; usually, there’s a kind of one-upmanship posting which just goes around in circles and cycling is regularly, ahem, re-cycled.
If anyone says that’s what forums are all about, to me it’s just bickering for the sake of it.
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
Re: Return of the cyclist scourge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Fair point. I don’t intend arguing this through to a standstill as has become the norm in Current Affairs.
But with all the brain power exhibited here, seldom are solutions to problems suggested; usually, there’s a kind of one-upmanship posting which just goes around in circles and cycling is regularly, ahem, re-cycled.
If anyone says that’s what forums are all about, to me it’s just bickering for the sake of it.
Spot on there. I started this thread with a glint in my eye!
Difference between a debate and an argument - debate is usually about what’s right, argument is usually about who’s right.
Debates are usually about exchanges of information, hoping that this information may enlighten/sway others’ viewpoints - arguments are usually just trying to shout someone down.
__________________ There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Difference between a debate and an argument - debate is usually about what’s right, argument is usually about who’s right.
Debates are usually about exchanges of information, hoping that this information may enlighten/sway others’ viewpoints- arguments are usually just trying to shout someone down.
Very true and a mixture of each can be productive but when the shouting takes prevalence, the point of the discussion can be all but forgotten.
Btw, not referring to this thread or any particular contributor but attitudes in general seem aggressively adversarial for the sake of it. It’s as if a debate is going nowhere before it starts because you can see its shape as the sides line up.
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
Re: Return of the cyclist scourge
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk
Very true and a mixture of each can be productive but when the shouting takes prevalence, the point of the discussion can be all but forgotten.
Btw, not referring to this thread or any particular contributor but attitudes in general seem aggressively adversarial for the sake of it. It’s as if a debate is going nowhere before it starts because you can see its shape as the sides line up.
Interesting point. My take on this is that many, if not most, threads polarise into the opposing views of those who were Remainers and those who were Leavers. Pretty much on any topic.
Interesting point. My take on this is that many, if not most, threads polarise into the opposing views of those who were Remainers and those who were Leavers. Pretty much on any topic.
It does seem that way. I suppose time will heal the rift. Eventually