President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by passingbat

Shure; it's called the Bible.

This is the best explanation of the Nephilim and their implication in the end times, that I've come accros.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IspWwhwqfk&t=263s

Why don't you start a new thread on Christian fundamentalism? I cannot see how this relates to President Trump & the U.S Election 2016 Investigation ?

[passingbat]

Originally Posted by ianch99

Enough already! Can we drop all this medieval mumbo jumbo rubbish? It is scaring off the visitor(s)

My replies are to people that ask things that are require a Biblical answer, such as Hugh's question:


Originally Posted by Hugh
Are you a supporter/believer of the evangelicals dispensational pre-millennialism End Times narrative?

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by passingbat

My replies are to people that ask things that are require a Biblical answer

Was the bit about 'Scottish Rite Freemasons praying for the spirit of the Egyptian god, Osiris to enter the President' in the Bible ?

[passingbat]

Originally Posted by Mr K

Was the bit about 'Scottish Rite Freemasons praying for the spirit of the Egyptian god, Osiris to enter the President' in the Bible ?

Demonic activity and spiritual warfare is is; and that is an example.

Originally Posted by Damien

I don't see how you can be angry that the Republican memo was being blocked and think it's entirely right that the Democrat one is.

Just apply the same standards across the board.

Whose angry?

I’m not. The Republican Memo isn’t blocked. The Democrat one rightfully is, it’s not been through the same processes, it’s partisan, unlike the House Intel one being bipartisan. They are suppose to work together.

I have told you, I do not trust the Democrats, given that it is them who have behaved in a disgusting way during the Election, weaponised the DOJ/FBI in Hillary’s favour and then treated the opposing candidate with disdain, indicted people for telling lies to the FBI, when Hillary did same under oath during a congressional testimony and nothing happened to her.

---------- Post added at 12:03 ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 ----------

Originally Posted by ianch99

Why don't you start a new thread on Christian fundamentalism? I cannot see how this relates to President Trump & the U.S Election 2016 Investigation ?

^ I agree with this.

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by passingbat

Demonic activity and spiritual warfare is is; and that is an example.

You could be right, there is certainly something demonic about Trump. Do you think those pesky Scottish Freemasons (and their Egyptian friend Osiris) have taken possession of the President ?

Back on topic. Now please, any more off topic ones will be deleted!

[1andrew1]

Interestingly, this report could mean that that parts of the Steele dossier - criticised by Trump’s fans - may have been corroborated by Shearer’s independent research.

Memo written by former journalist Cody Shearer independently sets out some of the allegations made by ex-spy Christopher Steele

The FBI inquiry into alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 US presidential election has been given a second memo that independently set out some of the same allegations made in a dossier by Christopher Steele, the British former spy.
The second memo was written by Cody Shearer, a controversial political activist and former journalist who was close to the Clinton White House in the 1990s.

Fake News. You’re so cold Andrew. There were two Dossiers, both Fake, created to back one another up. No expense spared by the DNC by looks of it, only one thing wasn’t suppose to happen for it all to be exposed. Trump won.

Originally Posted by Mick

Whose angry?

I’m not. The Republican Memo isn’t blocked. The Democrat one rightfully is, it’s not been through the same processes, it’s partisan, unlike the House Intel one being bipartisan. They are suppose to work together.

But the Republican one is also partisan. This wasn't a jointly agreed memo covering the contents of their intelligence briefings, it's an opinionated memo which the Democrats dispute.

You don't trust the Democrats so imagine if the Democrats were releasing their memo covering the intelligence but blocking the underlying report and the Republican one. This is the same thing, just the other way around.

I have told you, I do not trust the Democrats

I think that's perfectly healthy. I don't get why you trust the Republicans so much though.

Originally Posted by Mick

Whose angry?

I’m not. The Republican Memo isn’t blocked. The Democrat one rightfully is, it’s not been through the same processes, it’s partisan, unlike the House Intel one being bipartisan. They are suppose to work together.

I have told you, I do not trust the Democrats, given that it is them who have behaved in a disgusting way during the Election, weaponised the DOJ/FBI in Hillary’s favour and then treated the opposing candidate with disdain, indicted people for telling lies to the FBI, when Hillary did same under oath during a congressional testimony and nothing happened to her.

---------- Post added at 12:03 ---------- Previous post was at 12:01 ----------



^ I agree with this.

The House Intel Memo was written by Devon Nunes’ staffers - no Democrats were involved. In fact, they didn’t know about it until he announced it mid-January (having spent a number of months putting it together).

In a letter to Nunes last week, the Trump-appointed DoJ Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd said

the damaging impact that the release of classified material could have on our national security and our ability to share and receive sensitive information from friendly foreign governments

Also

Boyd’s letter to Nunes referred to the document as “a staff-drafted memorandum that purports to be based on classified source materials that neither you nor most of them have seen.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...s-memo/551825/

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Damien

I think that's perfectly healthy. I don't get why you trust the Republicans so much though.

I trust neither and I'm no fan of the Clintons. But if I just read Republican tweets, White House press releases and videos and viewed Fox News and some alt-right websites I would have a hard job to think independently and it would not be long before I too would trust the Republicans and Trump in particular without hesitation.

---------- Post added at 20:34 ---------- Previous post was at 20:30 ----------

Originally Posted by Hugh

The House Intel Memo was written by Devon Nunes’ staffers - no Democrats were involved. In fact, they didn’t know about it until he announced it mid-January (having spent a number of months putting it together).

Sorry that you've been duped, Mick. It sounds like it wasn't as unbiased as you were led to believe.

Originally Posted by Damien

But the Republican one is also partisan. This wasn't a jointly agreed memo covering the contents of their intelligence briefings, it's an opinionated memo which the Democrats dispute.

You don't trust the Democrats so imagine if the Democrats were releasing their memo covering the intelligence but blocking the underlying report and the Republican one. This is the same thing, just the other way around.

Only the Democrats are rightfully in the minority, so they were unable to block it. Being in the majority, the Republicans rightfully blocked the Counter Memo because it is a rush job to counter the original.

Originally Posted by Damien

I think that's perfectly healthy. I don't get why you trust the Republicans so much though.

I’m surprised you have to ask,

Because the Democrats put forward a Crooked candidate who rigged the primaries by getting the questions to the debate and now it looks like that wasn’t the only rigging they did.

---------- Post added at 20:54 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Originally Posted by Hugh

The House Intel Memo was written by Devon Nunes’ staffers - no Democrats were involved. In fact, they didn’t know about it until he announced it mid-January (having spent a number of months putting it together).

In a letter to Nunes last week, the Trump-appointed DoJ Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd said

Also

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...s-memo/551825/

The House Intel Memo was not just written just by Nunes at all. You are Wrong. He is getting credit for it because he is the House Select Committee of Intelligence Chairman. The Intel was gathered in by bipartisan hearings.

And I couldn’t give a shit what General Stephen Boyd said. Irrelevant.

I didn’t say Nunes wrote it - I said his staffers wrote it; no Democrats were involved in the writing of it.

How is it irrelevant what a Republican Assistant Attorney General, who used to work for Jeff Sessions, and who was appointed by Trump, says - he can’t be accused of being biased towards the Democrats.

He is the liaison between the DoJ and Congress - it is his job to advise on things like this.

Originally Posted by Mick

Because the Democrats put forward a Crooked candidate who rigged the primaries by getting the questions to the debate and now it looks like that wasn’t the only rigging they did.

I didn't ask why you didn't trust the Democrats, I asked why you trust the Republicans so much. If the Republicans say something it's fact here. It doesn't matter what anyone else says, if a Trump or the Republicans say something you say here as if it were gospel. Same with this memo.