16-06-2019, 21:36
|
#3526
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,231
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
It's the EU we're leaving, not the US, Japan or China. We have to deal with the EU's behaviour and we have to play our cards right, which we haven't done. We have the 39 billion and we are net importers of their stuff; those cards have to be played.
The EU is meddling with our constitutional arrangements by insisting on the Backstop and Macron has threatened to keep the Backstop on if we don't give up our fishing grounds; the US and China wouldn't do that. The EU would have control over us due to the Backstop.
You really shouldn't be an apologist for the EU (you'll deny being an apologist but it's how you come across).
|
Damien's no apologist. He's just pointing out that in a negotiation, each side will try and maximise its advantages. By definition, it means they will try and minimise the advantages of the other side.
---------- Post added at 21:36 ---------- Previous post was at 21:32 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Damien’s post, quoting from The New European, currently advertising in its strapline a free Bollocks to Brexit mug when you subscribe for just £1 a week. Pardon me if I’m suspicious about the impartiality of that analysis.
|
Sorry, it was Hugh's post.
As well as the source you mention, Hugh also cites The Washington Post which unfortunately doesn't have such a good offer on ceramics.
|
|
|
16-06-2019, 22:02
|
#3527
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Damien’s post, quoting from The New European, currently advertising in its strapline a free Bollocks to Brexit mug when you subscribe for just £1 a week. Pardon me if I’m suspicious about the impartiality of that analysis.
|
Here’s the original source - Annelli Howard, a specialist in EU and competition law at Monckton Chambers and a member of the bar’s Brexit working group.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...it-say-experts
Quote:
There are two apparently insurmountable hurdles to the UK trading on current WTO tariffs in the event of Britain crashing out in March, said Howard.
Firstly, the UK must produce its own schedule covering both services and each of the 5,000-plus product lines covered in the WTO agreement and get it agreed by all the 163 WTO states in the 32 remaining parliamentary sitting days until 29 March 2019. A number of states have already raised objections to the UK’s draft schedule: 20 over goods and three over services.
To make it more complicated, there are no “default terms” Britain can crash out on, Howard said, while at the same time, the UK has been blocked by WTO members from simply relying on the EU’s “schedule” – its existing tariffs and tariff-free trade quotas.
The second hurdle is the sheer volume of domestic legislation that would need to be passed before being able to trade under WTO rules: there are nine statutes and 600 statutory instruments that would need to be adopted.
The government cannot simply cut and paste the 120,000 EU statutes into UK law and then make changes to them gradually, Howard said. “The UK will need to set up new enforcement bodies and transfer new powers to regulators to create our own domestic regimes,” she said.
|
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
16-06-2019, 23:54
|
#3528
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb,
V6 STB
Posts: 7,862
|
Re: Brexit
Strange that it HAS successfully been done before.
Split up of Czechoslovakia and Brexit.
Quote:
From the current perspective, it is hard to imagine that the split was agreed and executed in less than a year.
...
Considering the timing of Brexit and to avoid legal loopholes, a “copy & paste approach” should be considered with respect to EU legislation effective in Britain. This is viewed as the standard approach in international law and was also used in the process of dissolving Czechoslovakia.
|
Weird that all this guff comes AFTER Remain lost the vote.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 01:12
|
#3529
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,231
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
|
What has been done before? Small countries splitting up? What is your point? Are you advocating the UK splits up to solve the backstop issue?
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 01:56
|
#3530
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb,
V6 STB
Posts: 7,862
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
What has been done before? Small countries splitting up? What is your point? Are you advocating the UK splits up to solve the backstop issue?
|
Czechoslovakia splitting up wasn't really that different to UK splitting from the EU. The SAME issues of moving from a common set of trade rules and regulations, to separate ones were there, as have been with other countries splitting up.
The Soviet Union split up, and that wasn't exactly a small country.
The backstop has nothing to do with what WTO rules or otherwise we can or cannot use, or with any regulations needed or not needed.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 07:26
|
#3531
|
10 yrs same company 😁
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Expanding Town with crap roads
Age: 64
Services: ? BB, basic phone. Share of Disney+
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
Czechoslovakia splitting up wasn't really that different to UK splitting from the EU. The SAME issues of moving from a common set of trade rules and regulations, to separate ones were there, as have been with other countries splitting up.
The Soviet Union split up, and that wasn't exactly a small country.
The backstop has nothing to do with what WTO rules or otherwise we can or cannot use, or with any regulations needed or not needed.
|
The Backstop is to temporarily manage the GFA until an alternative arrangement can be made for the Irish border for trade. So it does have everything to do with WTO rules.
If NI decides on reunification, the Backstop is no longer required and the border in the Irish Sea is permanent.
Last edited by Angua; 17-06-2019 at 07:32.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 10:50
|
#3532
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
|
So you’re comparing a country that wasn’t in the EU to one that is to show it can be done?
Here’s the article without having to register - don’t see much in there to help, except this...
Quote:
the most important lesson to be learnt from the dissolution of Czechoslovakia is undoubtedly the willingness to go through the entire departure process in a peaceful and cooperative way.
|
http://www.giese.cz/novinky/brexit-l...nt-for-brexit/
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 17-06-2019 at 10:56.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 11:12
|
#3533
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb,
V6 STB
Posts: 7,862
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
|
So how was this "peaceful and cooperative way" carried out involving the rest of the world? There was no need to. That is essentially the comparison. The EU would just become another "country". No need to agree anything with them, which is what we're talking about with a no-deal scenario. It was only the "divorce" elements(division of assets, debt etc) they(Czechs & Slovaks) needed to agree on. Their trade relationships with the rest of the World carried on without any fuss.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 11:20
|
#3534
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
So how was this "peaceful and cooperative way" carried out involving the rest of the world? There was no need to. That is essentially the comparison. The EU would just become another "country". No need to agree anything with them, which is what we're talking about with a no-deal scenario. It was only the "divorce" elements(division of assets, debt etc) they(Czechs & Slovaks) needed to agree on. Their trade relationships with the rest of the World carried on without any fuss.
|
Point.
Missed.
Completely...
There were no actual examples in the article you linked to which would show how this would be helpful to the UK - which is why the article header was a question, not a statement...
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 13:11
|
#3535
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
Hugh's post #3521 shows why the above is incorrect and his subsequent post #3527 puts the nail in the coffin.
|
The only real question is whether we can get a bi-lateral agreement with the EU, which you and other remainers on here are convinced is impossible. I don't buy that.
I see no reason why the EU would not co-operate to the extent that it too is concerned about frictionless trade to us.
In the Washington post article that Hugh posted, the revelation is made that a protection period is possible.
' WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo confirmed that there must be a bilateral agreement between the EU and U.K. in order to claim an implementation period under GATT Article 24. “Once they have an agreement I think Article 24 could give them some time for implementation of that agreement,” he told Bloomberg. “But the first question is the agreement itself.”
However, the defeatist attitude that so many posts on here reveal simply doesn't allow them to see the obvious. I guess they won't believe it until they see it. Only then will they shut up about the impossibility of it all and move on to a new lefty topic to promote despite all reason to the contrary.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 14:28
|
#3536
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,231
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
The only real question is whether we can get a bi-lateral agreement with the EU, which you and other remainers on here are convinced is impossible. I don't buy that.
I see no reason why the EU would not co-operate to the extent that it too is concerned about frictionless trade to us.
In the Washington post article that Hugh posted, the revelation is made that a protection period is possible.
'WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo confirmed that there must be a bilateral agreement between the EU and U.K. in order to claim an implementation period under GATT Article 24. “Once they have an agreement I think Article 24 could give them some time for implementation of that agreement,” he told Bloomberg. “But the first question is the agreement itself.”
However, the defeatist attitude that so many posts on here reveal simply doesn't allow them to see the obvious. I guess they won't believe it until they see it. Only then will they shut up about the impossibility of it all and move on to a new lefty topic to promote despite all reason to the contrary.
|
Business is largely against Brexit so you can say that Brexit is more left-wing than right-wing. Indeed, we heard one infamous Brexiter say "F-business".
What you repeatedly fail to recognise is that no-deal means what it says. It doesn't mean a different type of deal or a cake-and-eat-it deal.
If you read the serious business analysis around Brexit, you will understand that the EU doesn't want to undermine the integrity of the single market and needs to demonstrate that it will stand by its smaller members.
Quote:
"Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, said last week that the 585-page exit treaty “is not a treaty between Theresa May and Juncker, it is a treaty between the UK and the EU. It has to be respected by whoever is the next British prime minister.”
Yielding on that point of principle risked damaging the EU for years to come, one official told the Financial Times, placing at stake the integrity of the single market and decimating trust that the bloc would stick by its smaller members, in this case Ireland.
Ireland is also quick to dismiss suggestions from Tory leadership contenders that the new prime minister will get superior terms from Brussels and an alternative to the backstop.
As Mr Johnson and his rivals insist they can secure new solutions to the border question once they take office, Dublin sees such demands as further proof of the need for an “all weather” backstop to avoid checks on the frontier no matter who is in power.
|
https://www.ft.com/content/50a31434-...d-b42f641eca37
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 15:09
|
#3537
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: #Plagueisland
Age: 53
Services: VM VIP Pack
Posts: 1,668
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
The only real question is whether we can get a bi-lateral agreement with the EU, which you and other remainers on here are convinced is impossible. I don't buy that.
I see no reason why the EU would not co-operate to the extent that it too is concerned about frictionless trade to us.
In the Washington post article that Hugh posted, the revelation is made that a protection period is possible.
'WTO Director-General Roberto Azevedo confirmed that there must be a bilateral agreement between the EU and U.K. in order to claim an implementation period under GATT Article 24. “Once they have an agreement I think Article 24 could give them some time for implementation of that agreement,” he told Bloomberg. “But the first question is the agreement itself.”
However, the defeatist attitude that so many posts on here reveal simply doesn't allow them to see the obvious. I guess they won't believe it until they see it. Only then will they shut up about the impossibility of it all and move on to a new lefty topic to promote despite all reason to the contrary.
|
Of course the countries of the EU want a deal with the UK, it's a no brainer to accommodate gravity based trade. However, the EU27 have some other priorities/red lines, namely;
- Citizens rights
- Integrity of the EU single market and customs union
- The Good Friday Agreement
- Financial liabilities already agreed to
Putting any one or more of the above at risk brings everything to a grinding halt. The agreement already proposed but knocked back covered these priorities of course, for better or for worse.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 18:50
|
#3538
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbxx
Of course the countries of the EU want a deal with the UK, it's a no brainer to accommodate gravity based trade. However, the EU27 have some other priorities/red lines, namely;
- Citizens rights
- Integrity of the EU single market and customs union
- The Good Friday Agreement
- Financial liabilities already agreed to
Putting any one or more of the above at risk brings everything to a grinding halt. The agreement already proposed but knocked back covered these priorities of course, for better or for worse.
|
Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed, and that includes the £39bn.
All we need is a Canada style trade deal and given that the EU have already said we can have that, it won't be so difficult to get an agreement to negotiate that which will satisfy GATT.
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 19:39
|
#3539
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: #Plagueisland
Age: 53
Services: VM VIP Pack
Posts: 1,668
|
Re: Brexit
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Nothing is agreed until everything is agreed, and that includes the £39bn.
All we need is a Canada style trade deal and given that the EU have already said we can have that, it won't be so difficult to get an agreement to negotiate that which will satisfy GATT.
|
Have the EU said we can have a Canada style deal? I have seen Canada being cited as the option left at the bottom of Barniers 'staircase' slide ( http://qpol.qub.ac.uk/brexit-tell-us-eu/) but I thought that was more what was left after the Governemts red lines were taken in to account.
Of course a Canada style deal still closes the RoI/NI border. We need that technology (or alternatively, May shouldn't have called an election and she could have binned off Northern Ireland)
That's the problem, everything keeps cycling back to either breach UK or EU red lines. I am sure there is a deal out there but as it stands, nothing is standing out
|
|
|
17-06-2019, 23:15
|
#3540
|
Sulking in the Corner
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: RG41
Services: 1 Gbps; Hub 4 MM; ASUS RT-AX88U; Ultimate VOLT. BT Infinity2; Devolo 1200AV
Posts: 11,955
|
Re: Brexit
There is no deal standing out there. The EU won’t lose face - any trade deal for the future relationship will require us to pay the 39 billion. If they agree to the 14 billion we say we go, then maybe.
Otherwise, sod them.
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:17.
|