UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal
26-09-2019, 10:10
|
#556
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,366
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Well, it takes two sides to tango. The anger seems to be on the remainer side due to the proroguing of Parliament. If they calm down, I am sure it will be reciprocated.
The anger on the streets will not go away until this matter is resolved, and if the electorate do not get what they voted for, that is to leave, everything will be escalated. Remainers cannot just shout insults and ignore what the majority want. They need to vote and help us achieve a deal which enables us to forge our own trade deals with the rest of the world.
If they don't do this, we will have the scenario they say they don't want ie, a 'no deal'.
|
For proroguing Parliament read "breaking the law".
If there's one thing I'm certain of its that Boris won't calm down. His electoral future depends on stoking the fire of nationalism.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 10:18
|
#557
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,739
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
For proroguing Parliament read "breaking the law".
If there's one thing I'm certain of its that Boris won't calm down. His electoral future depends on stoking the fire of nationalism.
|
The law didn't exist at the time of proroguing, it was invented on Tuesday.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 10:42
|
#558
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,366
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
The law didn't exist at the time of proroguing, it was invented on Tuesday.
|
Of course it did. Government was playing fast and loose with its interpretation of convention. Which is/was obvious to everyone but the most "Brexit at all costs" types.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 10:45
|
#559
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,309
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
But who, in your words, can "shove Corbyn out the way"? His opposition within his party are weak with no guts and JC's inner circle just keep telling him he is wonderful.
The Lib Dems have also made a big mistake in putting the Revoke stake in the ground "when we are in Government", really? Get real. They should be cementing a centre ground coalition to prevent Farage and his cohorts from teaming up with Johnson and taking us off into a necon paradise.
It is as if *all* politicians, from all sides, have lost all sense of perspective.
---------- Post added at 22:53 ---------- Previous post was at 22:50 ----------
Yeah, his dismissal of MPs' death threats as humbug ... really on the ball. The man is a cretin ..
|
Spot on with all of the above Ian.
As for Johnsons' M.O. it seems to be to desensitise everyone so much with his behaviour that nothing he does or says has any consequences on himself. A tactic used extensively on the other side of the pond.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 10:47
|
#560
|
Sad Doig Fan!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barry South Wales
Age: 68
Services: With VM for BB 250Mb service.(Deal)
Posts: 11,657
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Of course it did. Government was playing fast and loose with its interpretation of convention. Which is/was obvious to everyone but the most "Brexit at all costs" types.
|
Interpretation of convention is not evidence of the existance of legal statute.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 11:11
|
#561
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,366
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
Interpretation of convention is not evidence of the existance of legal statute.
|
They didn't invent law as claimed. Only Parliament can do that.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 11:22
|
#562
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
The law didn't exist at the time of proroguing, it was invented on Tuesday.
|
No law was invented on Tuesday - the Supreme Court adjudicated that BJ's actions were unlawful (that his reasons for prorogation for five weeks were not supported by the weight of evidence), and therefore were null and void.
Again, to avoid confusion - no new law was invented on Tuesday; people saying this have a lack of understanding of what actually happened.
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 11:29
|
#563
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,739
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
They didn't invent law as claimed. Only Parliament can do that.
|
It's clear they invented law to frustrate brexit,11 out of 11 judges reach the same conclusion , that just stinks of an establishment stitch up.
It seems that any one on the remain side can invent laws to keep us shackled to the corrupt EU.
There's even talk of rehashing the surrender bill now.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 11:51
|
#564
|
067
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 48
Services: Many
Posts: 4,605
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
It's clear they invented law to frustrate brexit,11 out of 11 judges reach the same conclusion , that just stinks of an establishment stitch up.
It seems that any one on the remain side can invent laws to keep us shackled to the corrupt EU.
There's even talk of rehashing the surrender bill now.
|
How so? When good old Boris clearly stated the prorogation of parliament had nothing to do with Brexit. The Supreme Courts ruling was in direct response to the prorogation, nothing else. Lady Hale made that eminently clear.
Unless of course Boris was telling fibs?
Here's the government statement via 3rd party (BBC)
The government defended its action, saying it had nothing to do with Brexit. It argued proroguing Parliament was a "proceeding in Parliament" and would allow the PM to outline plans for domestic policies, like NHS funding.
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
Last edited by mrmistoffelees; 26-09-2019 at 12:07.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 11:53
|
#565
|
Sad Doig Fan!
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barry South Wales
Age: 68
Services: With VM for BB 250Mb service.(Deal)
Posts: 11,657
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
No law was invented on Tuesday - the Supreme Court adjudicated that BJ's actions were unlawful (that his reasons for prorogation for five weeks were not supported by the weight of evidence), and therefore were null and void.
Again, to avoid confusion - no new law was invented on Tuesday; people saying this have a lack of understanding of what actually happened.
|
Correct Hugh. What happend Tuesday was a legal precedent was set.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 13:44
|
#566
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
It's clear they invented law to frustrate brexit,11 out of 11 judges reach the same conclusion , that just stinks of an establishment stitch up.
It seems that any one on the remain side can invent laws to keep us shackled to the corrupt EU.
There's even talk of rehashing the surrender bill now.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
No law was invented on Tuesday - the Supreme Court adjudicated that BJ's actions were unlawful (that his reasons for prorogation for five weeks were not supported by the weight of evidence), and therefore were null and void.
Again, to avoid confusion - no new law was invented on Tuesday; people saying this have a lack of understanding of what actually happened.
|
I can explain it to you, I can’t understand it for you...
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 14:12
|
#567
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,739
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
I can explain it to you, I can’t understand it for you...
|
The back room lawyers opinion is noted, even if it was not asked for nor needed.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
Last edited by papa smurf; 26-09-2019 at 14:25.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 15:47
|
#568
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,099
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
The back room lawyers opinion is noted, even if it was not asked for nor needed.
|
Not my "opinion", it’s a fact (even if you do mix them up sometimes).
If a new law was "invented" on Tuesday, could you please show the legislation that "invented’ this law, as laws can only be created or changed by an Act of Parliament or Secondary legislation through statutory instruments (which can only be raised by the Government).
The Judiciary can’t "invent" laws.
You may find this helpful - https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 16:02
|
#569
|
vox populi vox dei
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: the last resort
Services: every thing
Posts: 13,739
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Not my "opinion", it’s a fact (even if you do mix them up sometimes).
If a new law was "invented" on Tuesday, could you please show the legislation that "invented’ this law, as laws can only be created or changed by an Act of Parliament or Secondary legislation through statutory instruments (which can only be raised by the Government).
The Judiciary can’t "invent" laws.
You may find this helpful - https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/
|
Once again i thank you for your opinion, i will of course take it onboard and decide at a later date if it has any merit .
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
|
|
|
26-09-2019, 17:36
|
#570
|
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,118
|
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Well, after all the kicking and screaming these pathetic Remainiac MPs have done about Parliament being shut down, the House of Commons has adjourned at 17:04, just over half n hour ago. So much for the Brexit scrutiny they were screeching for.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31.
|