[Merged] BB Speed Upgrades

[Kneebs]

Originally Posted by Bill C

I did not call you a liar show me where i called you a liar.

Err, i think it was this bit here....

Originally Posted by Kneebs
Well, NTL are investigating the problem of packet loss through samsung STBs, so you make your own mind up

Originally Posted by Bill C

Bull bull and more bull.

Sorry,you weren't actually calling me a liar - you were implying what I said was lies. You should be a politician, or work for NTL. Oh wait, you do

Enough of this please. Kneebs have you asked BBKing if you can publicly display his PM to you?

Originally Posted by Kneebs

Err, i think it was this bit here....






Sorry,you weren't actually calling me a liar - you were implying what I said was lies. You should be a politician, or work for NTL. Oh wait, you do

Well i will ask more questions tomorrow and keep asking till i get a someone to answer.

Originally Posted by Bill C

Well i will ask more questions tomorrow and keep asking till i get a someone to answer.

And it looks like i was red repped

[Kneebs]

Originally Posted by Mick

Enough of this please. Kneebs have you asked BBKing if you can publicly display his PM to you?

No, he isn't around to ask. I did say I normally wouldnt post details from PMs / emails, however in this case, it was warranted.

Its not like he's asked me to keep quiet or anything, however edit my post if you feel the need.

[Kneebs]

Originally Posted by Bill C

And it looks like i was red repped

Not by me you weren't. I did feel like red repping you however, but I didn't. Now thats the end of it from me..

Originally Posted by Kneebs

No, he isn't around to ask. I did say I normally wouldnt post details from PMs / emails, however in this case, it was warranted.

It's never warranted to post contents of PM's on the site, by all means name your source (if your source doesn't mind it) but not post all the contents without express permission from the author of the PM.

Anyway lets not drift off-topic here...

Originally Posted by Kneebs

Not by me you weren't. I did feel like red repping you however, but I didn't. Now thats the end of it from me..

No it was not you

Originally Posted by Bill C

No it was not you

Just had a look at your account Bill and its been left by someone who is unable to give or take rep points just yet, so it should be showing as grey and its not a red rep as such.

Anyway lets not drift off-topic here...

Originally Posted by Mick

Just had a look at your account Bill and its been left by someone who is unable to give or take rep points just yet, so it should be showing as grey and its not a red rep as such.

Anyway lets not drift off-topic here...

You learn something new everyday

[Florence]

Originally Posted by Kneebs

No, he isn't around to ask. I did say I normally wouldnt post details from PMs / emails, however in this case, it was warranted.

Its not like he's asked me to keep quiet or anything, however edit my post if you feel the need.

Lets hope his bosses feel its warranted also he could be in trouble. I certainly don't want to be around when BBK sees this.

[BBKing]

Enough of this please. Kneebs have you asked BBKing if you can publicly display his PM to you?

Unless PM means Public Message instead of Private Message, then no. Don't expect any more help from this quarter if you carry on in this cavalier manner. Luckily my boss is quite forgiving.

As it happens, my information came from a chance conversation with the same gentleman Kneebs has been talking to, so that's circular intelligence backing itself up - in fact I suggested he talk to Bill C whose opinion I trust. Still want to see some more evidence, but I have perfect licence to stop helping in my spare time if people bruit my private conversations about and devote my attention to what I mainly get paid to do.

Originally Posted by BBKing

Unless PM means Public Message instead of Private Message, then no. Don't expect any more help from this quarter if you carry on in this cavalier manner. Luckily my boss is quite forgiving.

As it happens, my information came from a chance conversation with the same gentleman Kneebs has been talking to, so that's circular intelligence backing itself up - in fact I suggested he talk to Bill C whose opinion I trust. Still want to see some more evidence, but I have perfect licence to stop helping in my spare time if people bruit my private conversations about and devote my attention to what I mainly get paid to do.

If you want a chat tomorrow feel free you know my number .

Thu, 26 Aug 2004 22:27:15 UTC
1st 128K took 516 ms = 254016 Bytes/sec = approx 2113 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 718 ms = 182552 Bytes/sec = approx 1519 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 688 ms = 190512 Bytes/sec = approx 1585 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 734 ms = 178572 Bytes/sec = approx 1486 kbits/sec


To repeat this test from the source server click here.

To repeat this test from a web proxy cache (if present):

- in Internet Explorer for Windows:
- click "Back"
- pull down "Tools" menu, select "Internet Options"
- click on button "Delete Files..."
- click OK, click OK
- click "Forward"

- in Netscape:
- click "Back"
- pull down "Edit" menu, select "Preferences"
- expand "Advanced"
- select "Cache"
- click on button "Clear Disk Cache"
- click OK
- click "Forward"


Connection and speed looking better then earlier today good work ntl

[Scotianet]

Thu, 26 Aug 2004 17:08:27 UTC
1st 128K took 1812 ms = 72336 Bytes/sec = approx 602 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1829 ms = 71663 Bytes/sec = approx 596 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1937 ms = 67668 Bytes/sec = approx 563 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1703 ms = 76965 Bytes/sec = approx 640 kbits/sec

Looks like NTL are going to wait until the 31st August before they update my SACM 600K to 750K.... Does anyone know if it is to do with me having bought my SACM and then getting a discounted rate for my service...??