Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
07-02-2018, 19:54
|
#46
|
Perfect Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Worthing West Sussex
Age: 66
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 10,966
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Quote:
Quote from Paul M
Our first was the Phillips N1502, in 1976.
We upgraded to a 1700 later (1978 or 1979, not sure now)
|
I must have got my 1702 in late '76 or early '77 as one of the earliest tapes is about the summer of '76
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
|
|
|
07-02-2018, 22:03
|
#48
|
Perfect Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Worthing West Sussex
Age: 66
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 10,966
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Got to remember when I bought the N1702 vs the other formats I paid £750 for the unit. The rest were much more and I went to a video specialist in South London and viewed the demonstration units for sale. Back-to-back at the time. Nothing on the highstreet.
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
Last edited by heero_yuy; 07-02-2018 at 22:06.
|
|
|
07-02-2018, 22:35
|
#49
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,578
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111
|
I remember we had one of each, vhs in living room, dining room had the betamax, that dad bought when he took early redundancy from one job, and got another job immediately
There was a video rental place near us, 1 and a half walls were VHS, 1/2 a wall betamax, and a rotating stand for the Video 2000 format!
Betamax was superior in terms of sound and picture quality, but the big boy film studios all got behind JVC and VHS, so there were more films to rent for it, so it was more popular. VHS was also cheaper.
I remember when dad got his first camcorder as well - VHS-C, rather than having to hook the camcorder up to the tv/video, you put the small tape, in a large adapter tape to play in normal VHS VCR
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 08:24
|
#50
|
An Awesome Dude
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,813
|
Ya I saw some VHS-C tapes @ salvation army..... I dont have anything to play those with though...........
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 10:28
|
#51
|
Virgin Media Employee
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Winchester
Services: Staff MyRates
BB: VM XXL
TV: VM XL
Phone : VM XL
Posts: 3,107
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Our VHS player stopped working which is a shame as I have films that have never been released on DVD. In once case you could download a US version of the film free from the maker but that's disappeared. (The UK release was better.)
In other cases the DVD version is still over £10 for old black and white movies. When I see films on offer on DVD I get them and dump the tape, many are on Netflix/Amazon prime or not really worth buying.
__________________
I work for VMO2 but reply here in my own right. Any help or advice is made on a best-effort basis. No comments construe any obligation on VMO2 or its employees.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 10:33
|
#52
|
Bah Humbug!!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Glasgow
Age: 42
Services: Sky Q 2Tb, Sky Q mini, boxsets and Sports & Movies HD, Sky Fibre unlimited
Posts: 13,759
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111
Yup thats the only difference. But I have always preferred mono anyway,its a better sound I think....
|
That makes no sense. It cannot possibly be a better sound than stereo or a great surround system.
Our first VCR was Sony's first front loader. It was still working till 2001 but totally died. Think I still have a few tapes somewhere.
__________________
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 | 32GB DDR5 6000 | RADEON 7900XT | WD 2TB NVME
Last edited by Stephen; 08-02-2018 at 10:37.
|
|
|
08-02-2018, 15:19
|
#53
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 61
Services: Flextel SIP : Sky Mobile : Sky Q TV : VM BB (1000 Mbps) : Aquiss FTTP (330 Mbps)
Posts: 27,616
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
I still have a working VCR connected to my TV via SCART.
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
09-02-2018, 00:04
|
#54
|
-
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,536
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111
|
I suspect there were 3 reasons.
- It was expensive.
- VHS offered longer tapes
- VHS offered a greater variety of content
They are interlinked, to some extent, as had Betamax sold better, the price would have come down, which would have encouraged more sales, and also encouraged more commercial releases on the system, but VHS also had the advantage of longer tapes. If you are looking at recording your TV, and look at the tape prices, what looks like better value? 3 or 4 hours for £10, or 1 or 2 hours for £10.
|
|
|
09-02-2018, 20:53
|
#55
|
An Awesome Dude
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,813
|
Im very confused about NTSC AND PAL Stuart..... You guys watch stuff mostly in PAL.. Is it the right speed???? -- I have heard pal is faster but how about if its played ON A PAL MACHENE?? -- Is it the right speed then? (Video/Audio)
If someone hooked two VCRs together and copied a PAL tape to an NTSC that would be the right speed I think....... (The pal player would play it @ the right speed to the other one)
|
|
|
09-02-2018, 22:04
|
#56
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 61
Services: Flextel SIP : Sky Mobile : Sky Q TV : VM BB (1000 Mbps) : Aquiss FTTP (330 Mbps)
Posts: 27,616
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Of course its the right speed
They are just two different standards ;
PAL is 25 Fames / Sec, and 625 lines
NTSC is 30 Frames / Sec, and 525 Lines.
You cannot play PAL encoded video on an NTSC machine, or vice versa.
(unless they are dual standard, or have a conversion system).
Neither is "faster" than the other, they just have differing frame rates.
NTSC = Never The Same Colour
__________________
Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
10-02-2018, 00:04
|
#57
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,293
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M
Of course its the right speed
They are just two different standards ;
PAL is 25 Fames / Sec, and 625 lines
NTSC is 30 Frames / Sec, and 525 Lines.
You cannot play PAL encoded video on an NTSC machine, or vice versa.
(unless they are dual standard, or have a conversion system).
Neither is "faster" than the other, they just have differing frame rates.
This old thread seems to have burst into life, it must be one of the few on the internet still talking about VCR's
i seem to remember (as you say) that dual standard machines in the UK played PAL and NTSC, most of the ones I had did just that and they weren't high end models except for one quite expensive svideo one I splashed out on. I'm not sure machines across the pond were as flexible when it came to playing PAL content.
NTSC = Never The Same Colour
|
I seem to remember most UK vcr's played NTSC also (as you say dual standard). I'm not sure the US NTSC machines were as flexible.
It's like being in a time warp in this thread !
Last edited by daveeb; 10-02-2018 at 00:17.
|
|
|
10-02-2018, 11:21
|
#58
|
Perfect Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Worthing West Sussex
Age: 66
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 10,966
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
PAL and the French SECAM TV systems prevent phase shifts in the transmission path from affecting the hue of the colours.
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
|
|
|
10-02-2018, 16:20
|
#59
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,997
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
I remember reading that watching Secam on a PAL receiver results in a black & white picture. Why did this happen?
Not sure if the sound was affected.
|
|
|
10-02-2018, 16:41
|
#60
|
Perfect Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Worthing West Sussex
Age: 66
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 10,966
|
Re: Does anyone actually use a VCR anymore?
Quote:
Quote from RichardCoulter
I remember reading that watching Secam on a PAL receiver results in a black & white picture. Why did this happen?
Not sure if the sound was affected.
|
The colour signal processing is different but the black and white part of the picture is very similar. The TV does not recognise the colour component so doesn't show it.
In the UK the sound was on 6mHz (intercarrier FM) whereas on the continent it was on 5.5Mhz. Sometimes the set will have enough "stretch" to render it.
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
Last edited by heero_yuy; 10-02-2018 at 16:44.
Reason: Past tense needed.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:37.
|