Jeffery Epstein and friends

[Halcyon]

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

I can't remember much about that year either but what I do remember is not going to stay with my paedophile and sex trafficker friends and having my photo taken with one of their victims, I think it's okay to judge people by the company they keep and whilst that does necessarily mean he's guilty of crimes that woeful interview and his failure to cooperate with investigations indicate he's hiding something and given the gravity of the crimes those two committed I'm all in favour of anyone concealing information being hauled over the coals

Exactly this.
You don't go and spend time in someones house knoewing they have been convicted. Alarm bells should have been going off to seriously distance himself from the man.
Something is not right.

If you analyse the interview there are lots of slip ups.

Well I really,really like to see the actual proof before judging anyone.So far apart from one photo(and photos aren't always proof positive) I've seen nothing that I can make any determination that Andrew is guilty of anything but poor judgement in business partners.

[Russ]

What I really don’t understand is why anyone expects Andrew to pay any damages to her. Ok morally he should (if guilty) but keep in mind this is a trial in a yank civil court which has zero jurisdiction in the UK. If this goes to court and the court rules in her favour they may well set damages at £3m but he won’t legally have to pay a penny.

Originally Posted by Halcyon

Exactly this.
You don't go and spend time in someones house knoewing they have been convicted. Alarm bells should have been going off to seriously distance himself from the man.

Pretty sure he wasnt convicted in 2001 (when that photo was allegadly taken).

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Paul

Pretty sure he wasnt convicted in 2001 (when that photo was allegadly taken).

Pretty sure he had been convicted when the prince last stayed with him and he remained chums with Maxwell long after Epsteins conviction, apparently and he gave the FBI "zero help", given the gravity of the crimes that alone should be enough for no one to defend him.

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Pretty sure he had been convicted when the prince last stayed with him and he remained chums with Maxwell long after Epsteins conviction, apparently and he gave the FBI "zero help", given the gravity of the crimes that alone should be enough for no one to defend him.

Got any links?

Originally Posted by Maggy

Got any links?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...-b1986335.html

Prince Andrew was introduced to Epstein by Maxwell in the early 1990s, and the trio enjoyed a close, and mutually beneficial friendship, even after Epstein was convicted of procuring a child for prostitution and of soliciting a prostitute in 2008.

Prince Andrew continued to visit Epstein in New York after Epstein’s conviction for child sex offences in Florida.

He was pictured opening the door of Epstein’s palatial Upper East Side townhouse in December 2010, and strolling through Central Park.

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Pretty sure he had been convicted when the prince last stayed with him and he remained chums with Maxwell long after Epsteins conviction, apparently and he gave the FBI "zero help", given the gravity of the crimes that alone should be enough for no one to defend him.

That was 9 years later, and while not a particularly clever thing to do, its not illegal, nor were any accusations of illegal activities made.

I'm not sure what you define as "long after", it was 3 years as best I can tell from reports.

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Paul

That was 9 years later, and while not a particularly clever thing to do, its not illegal, nor were any accusations of illegal activities made.

I'm not sure what you define as "long after", it was 3 years as best I can tell from reports.

Not really sure why your so interested in defining how many years long after is or why he was staying with a convicted paedophile nine years after something or other, the only thing that really matters for me is he hasn't and isn't cooperating with the authorities in matters so serious

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Not really sure why your so interested in defining how many years long after is

Your the one who stated "and he remained chums with Maxwell long after"
Its a meaningless statement without any kind of definition.

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Paul

Your the one who stated "and he remained chums with Maxwell long after"
Its a meaningless statement without any kind of definition.

In context of the crimes committed it is meaningless, a bizarre thing to pick up on unless of course deflection is the game

[OLD BOY]

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Not really sure why your so interested in defining how many years long after is or why he was staying with a convicted paedophile nine years after something or other, the only thing that really matters for me is he hasn't and isn't cooperating with the authorities in matters so serious

That’s probably on the advice of his lawyers.

[TheDaddy]

The civil case is allowed to proceed, apparently

[jfman]

BoJo on the ropes. Andy next.

What a time to be alive.

[GrimUpNorth]

Originally Posted by jfman

BoJo on the ropes. Andy next.

What a time to be alive.

But which is the distraction to which? That's the important question??