The state benefits system mega-thread.
22-08-2019, 09:32
|
#2296
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb,
V6 STB
Posts: 7,862
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
So competition, and by proxy capitalism, is bad?
Not the point I thought you were aiming for but there we go.
|
It's not competition. Overproduction(eg housing) leads to economic catastrophe. Nothing ends up cheaper. It has to all be paid for somewhere down the line. Eg Why build 9 plants when only 3 are needed? If those 3 firms got together and shared out the demand, the COSTS of producing the drugs would be cheaper than otherwise. Yet people claim that it anti-competitive and drives up prices? Their aim is to minimize costs and therefore prices.
Your original claim was:-
Quote:
What we know is capitalism is happy to let people die in the pursuit of profits. Pharmaceuticals 101. Limit supply, push prices up.
|
Competition means that if there was unfulfilled demand, somebody, somewhere would fill it. The central problem is that there isn't a massive unfulfilled demand.
Last edited by nomadking; 22-08-2019 at 09:46.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 10:03
|
#2297
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,359
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
The problem is you want to limit the number of suppliers. That's not perfect competition as defined in economics.
Oversupply isn't bad for the consumers it drives down prices until the market finds its equilibrium.
Capitalism should only be good for big business appears to be your stance.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 10:38
|
#2298
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Ask £5000 a year commuters if privatisation and increased competition lowered prices.
|
The high level of fares is explained by the fact that the government decided that rail users should pay more than the non-rail using taxpayer to fund the modernisation of the railways after many decades of neglect.
As an economist, you should be explaining that to us, not the other way around!
---------- Post added at 10:38 ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Why would they not seek to save on expenditure? It’s money they could spend elsewhere. Infrastructure, health, social care?
What we know is capitalism is happy to let people die in the pursuit of profits. Pharmaceuticals 101. Limit supply, push prices up.
|
That's an absurd analysis. Capitalism has the effect of reducing costs. Governments are well known for wasting money. Nationalised industries are inefficient. Everyone knows that.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 10:39
|
#2299
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,359
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
The high level of fares is explained by the fact that the government decided that rail users should pay more than the non-rail using taxpayer to fund the modernisation of the railways after many decades of neglect.
As an economist, you should be explaining that to us, not the other way around!
|
Exactly, the consumer still pays and more where competition isn't genuinely created. Giving us some of the highest fares per mile in Europe.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 10:45
|
#2300
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Can you translate that into English and more importantly explain why people needlessly die due to the cost of medical care? Either that not provided by the NHS or failed insurance based mldekd elsewhere.
Monopolies don’t keep costs down to the consumer. Don’t they teach capitalists basic economics?
|
Nationalised industries are monopolies, of course. You are just winding everyone up, you know you are talking nonsense.
---------- Post added at 10:45 ---------- Previous post was at 10:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Exactly, the consumer still pays and more where competition isn't genuinely created. Giving us some of the highest fares per mile in Europe.
|
As I explained, the fares in this country are high because the government has decided that it is not fair that all taxpayers should fund the required cost of investment and that it should be the rail user who pays for this.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 10:49
|
#2301
|
Still alive and fighting
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the land of beyond and beyond.
Services: XL BB, 3 360 boxes , XL TV.
Posts: 56,308
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
As I explained, the fares in this country are high because the government has decided that it is not fair that all taxpayers should fund the required cost of investment and that it should be the rail user who pays for this.
|
In other words the government does not give two hoots about the rail user..
__________________
“The only lesson you can learn from history is that it repeats itself”
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 13:28
|
#2302
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,359
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
Nationalised industries are monopolies, of course. You are just winding everyone up, you know you are talking nonsense.[COLOR="Silver"]
As I explained, the fares in this country are high because the government has decided that it is not fair that all taxpayers should fund the required cost of investment and that it should be the rail user who pays for this.
|
I'm not winding anyone up. Another poster just outlined the pharmaceutical industry as one that suits being a monopoly against all the conventional wisdom. If capitalism is failing in pharma, to the cost of human lives, health and wellbeing, it begs the question where else it is failing?
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 13:41
|
#2303
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Exactly, the consumer still pays and more where competition isn't genuinely created. Giving us some of the highest fares per mile in Europe.
|
You're not paying attention, are you?
---------- Post added at 13:41 ---------- Previous post was at 13:41 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone
In other words the government does not give two hoots about the rail user..
|
Why should people who don't use the railways pay for it?
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 14:40
|
#2304
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,359
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
You're not paying attention, are you?
---------- Post added at 13:41 ---------- Previous post was at 13:41 ----------
Why should people who don't use the railways pay for it?
|
Why should anyone pay for anything that delivers public good through taxation? Roads, education, etc.
Privatisation to the maximum leaves everyone worse off as profits are creamed off and losses passed back to the state with the state picking up the tab anyway.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 15:15
|
#2305
|
Perfect Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Worthing West Sussex
Age: 66
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 10,994
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Just as unbridled Socialism, nationalising everything in sight, has worked so well in Venezuela to the total impovrishment of the people.
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 15:26
|
#2306
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,098
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy
Just as unbridled Socialism, nationalising everything in sight, has worked so well in Venezuela to the total impovrishment of the people.
|
tbf, that was after decades of corrupt right-wing military dictatorship, so it didn’t start off in the soundest of footings...
(I think Venezuela "Socialism" is just another chapter in the corrupt governments of that part of South/Central America, with the label changing, but corruption reigning supreme...).
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 16:20
|
#2307
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Why should anyone pay for anything that delivers public good through taxation? Roads, education, etc.
Privatisation to the maximum leaves everyone worse off as profits are creamed off and losses passed back to the state with the state picking up the tab anyway.
|
As an economist, you should know that the benefit of privatisation is that you get major savings through being more efficient than the public sector. This allows you to make a profit as well as enable price reductions.
I have told you more than once already that it is government policy to increase rail fares to pay for the investment necessary to overcome decades of neglect by the former British Rail.
---------- Post added at 16:20 ---------- Previous post was at 16:15 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
tbf, that was after decades of corrupt right-wing military dictatorship, so it didn’t start off in the soundest of footings...
(I think Venezuela "Socialism" is just another chapter in the corrupt governments of that part of South/Central America, with the label changing, but corruption reigning supreme...).
|
The right wing government was not a good example, it is true, but the present Venezualan government has been remarkably unsuccessful at running the country on socialist lines. In fact, not a single socialist country that has abandoned capitalist ideals has ever been successful. Capitalism may not be perfect, but it has not been the utter disaster that socialism has.
I am hopeful that one day, someone will find the ideal mix of capitalism and socialism that actually works well.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 17:49
|
#2308
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 71
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,163
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
You're not paying attention, are you?
---------- Post added at 13:41 ---------- Previous post was at 13:41 ----------
Why should people who don't use the railways pay for it?
|
I don't use schools but I expect to pay for them..
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 18:51
|
#2309
|
Rise above the players
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wokingham
Services: 2 V6 boxes with 360 software, Now, ITVX, Amazon, Netflix, Lionsgate+, Apple+, Disney+, Paramount +,
Posts: 14,589
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J
I don't use schools but I expect to pay for them..
|
I know, but we have all benefited from education ourselves and by educating the population they are able to use their skills to benefit the economy, from which we get the money to pay for public services. So it is not a proper comparison.
|
|
|
22-08-2019, 20:15
|
#2310
|
Architect of Ideas
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,359
|
Re: The state benefits system mega-thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
As an economist, you should know that the benefit of privatisation is that you get major savings through being more efficient than the public sector. This allows you to make a profit as well as enable price reductions.
I have told you more than once already that it is government policy to increase rail fares to pay for the investment necessary to overcome decades of neglect by the former British Rail.
|
As an economist I actually know that to be untrue.
If you can't introduce genuine competition into a market all that happens is supernormal profits enter the private sector to the harm of consumers.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:28.
|