Britain outside the EU

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Odd, according to the two interviewed it wasn't any of the things you mentioned, just the fact local services had be cut to the bone and they wrongly blamed it on the labour council. Maybe those things you mention do matter to the people of Batley and Spen after all considering Labour held it or maybe they just identified less with the sleezy chumocricy currently making themselves richer at everyone else's expense at the heart of government

But what you have identified isn’t a constitutional problem, much less a problem that would be solved by outsourcing regional grant funding to a supra-national institution headquartered in Belgium.

If voters in Batley and Spen are incorrectly blaming the local Labour council for services being cut then that is an abject failure on the part of the local Labour Party which has allowed that narrative to develop. Again, not a constitutional problem and certainly not a problem that would lend any credence to the idea that British voters are too thick to vote on the issues (and therefore those nice people in Brussels should just make the decisions for them).

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Chris

But what you have identified isn’t a constitutional problem, much less a problem that would be solved by outsourcing regional grant funding to a supra-national institution headquartered in Belgium.

If voters in Batley and Spen are incorrectly blaming the local Labour council for services being cut then that is an abject failure on the part of the local Labour Party which has allowed that narrative to develop. Again, not a constitutional problem and certainly not a problem that would lend any credence to the idea that British voters are too thick to vote on the issues (and therefore those nice people in Brussels should just make the decisions for them).

No not a constitutional problem, we have levels of deceit and corruption third world juntas would be proud of, just today the chancellor has become embroiled in it all and it's the oppositions fault for being to incompetent to call it out, it's the publics fault for being thick or more likely to busy living their lives to be paying attention etc etc. I said on the day of the referendum no matter who won we needed to clean politics up and we should never allow campaigns to be run like that again and what happened, they're even worse today!

[1andrew1]

Food industry supply chain chaos result of Brexit, British poultry association says

The comments came after Nando's announced that 45 of its restaurants would temporarily shut due to supply chain disruptions and KFC said some of its products would not be available.

The boss of Britain's poultry industry body has called on the government to fast track workers as the sector faces severe disruptions that have forced restaurants including Nando's and KFC to adjust or cancel their service.

Richard Griffiths, chief executive of the British Poultry Council, also blamed worker shortages following Brexit for the issues the industry is currently facing.

Sky News understands that the group has contacted the Home Office about the issue, but has yet to receive a response.

A spokesperson for one of Britain's biggest poultry producers said that the company was not experiencing any inconvenience due to the so-called 'pingdemic'

"When you don't have people, you have a problem - and this is something we are seeing across the whole supply chain. The labour crisis is a Brexit issue," Mr Griffiths said.

https://news.sky.com/story/food-indu...-says-12384770

[Sephiroth]

So - cancel Brexit, everybody. Nando's is in difficulty.

Yes, it’s a Brexit issue, because, yes, we’ve cut off the cheap, unlimited East European labour tap. Here’s a phrase I seem to be using a lot lately: that was the point.

A point I’ve also made multiple times recently: British businesses need to stop squealing to be allowed back on the teat and come to terms with the fact that they now have to compete for British workers, they may have to start apprenticing and (shock, horror) they may have to stop offering crap pay and conditions, which has been a particular problem in the hospitality and leisure sector.

I’m not surprised the Home Office hasn’t rushed to respond to yet another business wailing to be allowed to carry on importing cheap labour rather than adopting some sense of responsibility to the communities in which it operates.

[jfman]

Originally Posted by Chris

Yes, it’s a Brexit issue, because, yes, we’ve cut off the cheap, unlimited East European labour tap. Here’s a phrase I seem to be using a lot lately: that was the point.

A point I’ve also made multiple times recently: British businesses need to stop squealing to be allowed back on the teat and come to terms with the fact that they now have to compete for British workers, they may have to start apprenticing and (shock, horror) they may have to stop offering crap pay and conditions, which has been a particular problem in the hospitality and leisure sector.

I’m not surprised the Home Office hasn’t rushed to respond to yet another business wailing to be allowed to carry on importing cheap labour rather than adopting some sense of responsibility to the communities in which it operates.

I don't really think the point was for Nando's to run out of chicken.

British businesses do indeed need to adjust, as does the British consumer to lower choice and higher prices. I'm the last person to go in and bat for unrestricted capitalism - but I don't really remember that being a "selling point" of Brexit.

As someone who thinks some political movements you oppose need to present exhaustive business cases for speculative economic manoeuvres it's odd that you seem to dismiss the legitimate concerns - dare I say democratic concerns - of a public who don't subscribe do your ideological opposition to the EU.

These are hardly the legitimate concerns of a public who don’t subscribe etc. These are the lobbyings of arch-capitalists who don’t like being cut off from their cheap labour supply and are agitating to get it back, despite being well aware, well in advance, that what carried Brexit was, in part, opposition to the unrestricted immigration of nationals from EU member states, with all the consequences that entailed for the communities most affected.

[jfman]

Originally Posted by Chris

These are hardly the legitimate concerns of a public who don’t subscribe etc. These are the lobbyings of arch-capitalists who don’t like being cut off from their cheap labour supply and are agitating to get it back, despite being well aware, well in advance, that what carried Brexit was, in part, opposition to the unrestricted immigration of nationals from EU member states, with all the consequences that entailed for the communities most affected.

I don't want to go down the "that wasn't on the side of a bus" route but your implication is that employers pay higher wages, and pay greater amount in training and retention of employees instead of import them. Again, a noble cause for Britain and others to not exploit poor countries by taking their highest skilled employees for our lowest wages.

However I really don't remember this being part of the compelling case that was made.

I don't see how it is possible to dismiss economics as a legitimate concern of the public as a whole. Inflation (higher wages, and cost of goods) has consequences. Lower amounts left over for discretionary spend, potential for higher interest rates, negative equity etc in the long run. This isn't solely a big business looking to top out their dividends scenario. And even if it was - isn't that glorious capitalism? They'll then reinvest that, etc etc nonsense I don't subscribe to anyway.

[1andrew1]

I think the point of Brexit from the literature I saw was to stop 100m Turks moving to the UK and for the UK to save £350m a week on funding the UK.

I don't recall seeing anything about better salaries for the lower paid and increased food costs. Indeed, the latter would have been rejected as Project Fear if anyone had mentioned it.

[jfman]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

I think the point of Brexit from the literature I saw was to stop 100m Turks moving to the UK and for the UK to save £350m a week on funding the UK.

I don't recall seeing anything about better salaries for the lower paid and increased food costs. Indeed, the latter would have been rejected as Project Fear if anyone had mentioned it.

Well this is the thing is was a bit all things to all people.

And that's democracy, just enough to make a majority.

It's odd that the distinction only seems to be for Scotland who, by any measure going, if they left would leave England better off!

[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

I think the point of Brexit from the literature I saw was to stop 100m Turks moving to the UK and for the UK to save £350m a week on funding the UK.

I don't recall seeing anything about better salaries for the lower paid and increased food costs. Indeed, the latter would have been rejected as Project Fear if anyone had mentioned it.

should read "... on funding the EU".

[mrmistoffelees]

Originally Posted by Chris

These are hardly the legitimate concerns of a public who don’t subscribe etc. These are the lobbyings of arch-capitalists who don’t like being cut off from their cheap labour supply and are agitating to get it back, despite being well aware, well in advance, that what carried Brexit was, in part, opposition to the unrestricted immigration of nationals from EU member states, with all the consequences that entailed for the communities most affected.

I'm not so sure on some of what you say, I'm sure the 'arch-capitalists' were and still are aware at the demise of cheap labour, the issue is that the unemployed Brits will not or cannot perform these roles for the salaries offered.

Now, it would be very easy at this point to simply say 'well, raise the salaries of these roles' but this then would us lead us down an interesting economic path.

A very simplistic view says you either make UK people take these roles. Or, you have to get cheap labour from somewhere

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

So - cancel Brexit, everybody. Nando's is in difficulty.

Just got a box of chicken wings from Aldi £1.49 KG and some peri peri coating from Heron 30p, crisis averted brexit is saved

[heero_yuy]

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

So - cancel Brexit, everybody. Nando's is in difficulty.

Not because of Brexit:

Quote from The Sun:

NANDO’S has been forced to shut around 50 outlets after a supply chain crisis left it running out of chicken.

Seventy of its staff have been sent to factories to help suppliers hit by a crippling shortage of workers.

Fast food fans were feeling fillet down last night by the shortage of chicken.

Yesterday Nando’s apologised to customers after running low on its popular Peri-Peri dish.

The chain — which serves a million meals a week — was forced to shut around 50 restaurants across Britain because of serious supply problems triggered by the Covid app pingdemic.

Daft bloody app causing more problems than covid or Brexit.

[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by heero_yuy

Not because of Brexit:



Daft bloody app causing more problems than covid or Brexit.

But giving the Remainers plenty of Schadenfreud.