Brexit (Old)

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

No, but seemingly respect for other viewpoints just has.

But do you agree with my assessment, and if not why?

[Hom3r]

I signed this petition.


Stop possible second referendum on E.U. membership



https://petition.parliament.uk/petit...J9XAT85WC240hQ

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by Hom3r

I signed this petition.


Stop possible second referendum on E.U. membership



https://petition.parliament.uk/petit...J9XAT85WC240hQ

Me too

[pip08456]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

No, but seemingly respect for other viewpoints just has.

Do you mean respect for comments from those who are hell bent on overturning the result of a democratic. vote? I have zero respect for those people.

[papa smurf]

Originally Posted by pip08456

Do you mean respect for comments from those who are hell bent on overturning the result of a democratic. vote? I have zero respect for those people.

me too

[djfunkdup]

+1 .. They should be put in prison for being a threat to our democracy ..

[Pierre]

I would just like Andrew , Ian, or Mr K to comment on my post. Do they accept my assessment? And if not, why not?

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Pierre

But do you agree with my assessment, and if not why?

No, I don't think IQs have dropped on this forum is my answer to your initial question.
In response to the rest of your post. If civil servants are preparing for the possibility of a referendum then you don't need to be Einstein to understand that this is a possibility.

[pip08456]

Originally Posted by Pierre

I would just like Andrew , Ian, or Mr K to comment on my post. Do they accept my assessment? And if not, why not?

Don't hold your breath Pierre.

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

In response to the rest of your post. If civil servants are preparing for the possibility of a referendum then you don't need to be Einstein to understand that this is a possibility.

Andrew, please read my post and respond accordingly

I’m not sure what you have posted there?

In regards to the law, and my post what is your response?

---------- Post added at 22:39 ---------- Previous post was at 22:32 ----------

Andrew, and others, I’ll spell it out for you.

Originally Posted by Pierre

A second referendum, which won’t happen but if it did, would have to take place before March next year.

Agree or not?

Also a bill would have to passed in parliament to repeal the withdrawal bill. Or at least to say if the country voted to remain to repeal the withdrawl bill.

I don’t see that happening in 5 months.

agree or not?

Therefore we will leave in March with, or without, a deal. Any second referendum would have to take place when we’re outside of the EU, which would mean having to negotiate re-entering the EU. Which would mean joining the single currency and a shed load of other things we opted out of when we were members.

Agree or not?

We are leaving in March 2019. There is nothing that can be done to stop it. It would be unlawful.

agree or not?

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Pierre

This is a fundamental fact some people haven’t grasped.

March next year we will exit the EU. That is law. Deal or no deal.

---------- Post added at 19:13 ---------- Previous post was at 19:13 ----------



She’s not in the cabinet, next point.

But is she is dictating HMG policy re: Brexit

15 All .. new balls please

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Pierre

Andrew, please read my post and respond accordingly

I’m not sure what you have posted there?

In regards to the law, and my post what is your response?

I have read your post and duly responded.
I am not a lawyer and from the sounds of things, neither are you. But to help you understand where I'm coming from, if civil servants are preparing for a second vote then it's a possibility. Therefore their legal advisers must believe it is lawful or has a possibility of being lawful.
Whether you are indifferent, in favour or opposed to a second vote, the actions of the civil service cannot be disregarded.

[ianch99]

Some on this forum need to take some chill pills. Prison, really?

---------- Post added at 22:49 ---------- Previous post was at 22:47 ----------

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

There probably are others who support the marchers. Not as many as those who want to leave, though, and that is the point.

As for your nonsense about this being a Tory issue, you are not making the connection that the majority are in line with the view that the EU is bad for us.

However, let's not just issue a health warning. Let's get outta here!

Yet again, you mislead. There was no majority for Brexit .. not in the country, not even in the electorate.

Please stick to the facts .. keep the debate honest.

---------- Post added at 22:50 ---------- Previous post was at 22:49 ----------

Originally Posted by Pierre

Have IQ’s suddenly dropped on this forum?

No but good manners have.

---------- Post added at 22:51 ---------- Previous post was at 22:50 ----------

Originally Posted by Pierre

I would just like Andrew , Ian, or Mr K to comment on my post. Do they accept my assessment? And if not, why not?

Bad laws can be repealed.

---------- Post added at 22:53 ---------- Previous post was at 22:51 ----------

Originally Posted by djfunkdup

+1 .. They should be put in prison for being a threat to our democracy ..

I am not sure whether to laugh or cry at this. I think it is a joke but I do wonder if you meant it?

[Pierre]

Originally Posted by ianch99

But is she is dictating HMG policy re: Brexit

15 All .. new balls please

Nope. This is a side show any way so we’ll end it here.

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Hom3r

I signed this petition.


Stop possible second referendum on E.U. membership



https://petition.parliament.uk/petit...J9XAT85WC240hQ

10,000 signatures in 2 months. Not bad. It may reach 30,000 by the time it is removed ..