President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

[denphone]

Originally Posted by Mick

The people who voted for Trump, think they made the right choice, my American friends think he is doing just great, they didn't want another useless Obama, which is what they would have got with Crooked Hillary. But if Trump is so rubbish, in your opinion, I'd love to see him do really well, given that his apparent rubbishness is causing the U.S economy to boom and recover, job numbers are up for women and blacks and he could potentially solve the North Korea crisis, invoking a peaceful resolution in the Korean Peninsula not seen in absolute decades. But yeah, so rubbish is that.

Look Mick you are totally entitled to your opinion of Mr Trump , Hilary , Obama etc ,etc but there are many who might not think the same way.

Originally Posted by denphone

Look Mick you are totally entitled to your opinion of Mr Trump , Hilary , Obama etc ,etc but there are many who might not think the same way.

It's irrelevant what we think on this side of the pond, the evidence is there for all to see, regardless of how much people may hate the man, the U.S is doing extremely well economically, under HIS leadership and that's all those who voted for him care about, they certainly couldn't give a shit what we in Britain thinks.

Originally Posted by Mick

The people who voted for Trump, think they made the right choice, my American friends think he is doing just great, they didn't want another useless Obama, which is what they would have got with Crooked Hillary. But if Trump is so rubbish, in your opinion, I'd love to see him do really well, given that his apparent rubbishness is causing the U.S economy to boom and recover, job numbers are up for women and blacks and he could potentially solve the North Korea crisis, invoking a peaceful resolution in the Korean Peninsula not seen in absolute decades. But yeah, so rubbish is that.

The US economy 'recover' from what? It was also doing very well under Obama too. Obama had almost constant growth and he was handed an economy after the 2008 crash.

I am not disputing the US economy has done well under Trump but it's a bit of a double standard to call Obama useless for also growing the economy and claim it's 'recovering'.

As shown here the record of Obama's last year is very similar to Trump's first year: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...on-the-economy

[1andrew1]

I had to chuckle at Ned Price's tweet today "This is the first time Russians have had a say in picking a president since November 2016."
https://twitter.com/nedprice/status/975375891554545664

http://thehill.com/homenews/state-wa...g-case-reports

The Supreme Court on Monday denied Republican requests to delay a Pennsylvania state court ruling requiring the state’s congressional map be redrawn, increasing the likelihood that the map will be redrawn ahead of November's midterm elections.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1GV2BZ

A panel of federal judges in Pennsylvania on Monday refused to block the state’s new congressional district map from taking effect, rejecting Republican arguments that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court overstepped its authority in issuing new voting lines in February.

The ruling, a victory for Democrats hoping to defeat Republican incumbents in November’s midterm congressional elections, came just 24 hours before candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives must file petitions to secure spots on this fall’s ballot.

This will affect the 2018 mid-term Elections.

Typical of the pathetic Democrats, changing the goal posts, cheating because they can not win a political race legitimately*. (*These days as per the cheating of Bernie Sanders in the Primaries in 2016, DNC and Hillary campaign paying for Dossier, compiled by Russians).

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Mick

Typical of the pathetic Democrats, changing the goal posts, cheating because they can not win a political race legitimately*. (*These days as per the cheating of Bernie Sanders in the Primaries in 2016, DNC and Hillary campaign paying for Dossier, compiled by Russians).

I thought that Dossier was a great British export?

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

I thought that Dossier was a great British export?

Do keep up, Steele got his duff ‘Intel’ from Russians.

Originally Posted by Mick

Typical of the pathetic Democrats, changing the goal posts, cheating because they can not win a political race legitimately*. (*These days as per the cheating of Bernie Sanders in the Primaries in 2016, DNC and Hillary campaign paying for Dossier, compiled by Russians).

Have you looked to see if it's possible the boundaries are unfair?

FiveThirtyEight, the data site thing, has done a piece on it here: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...c-gerrymander/

The court ordered that the map be redrawn after finding that the current one, which was enacted by the Republican state legislature in 2011, was a partisan gerrymander and violated the state’s constitution. (Republicans were given a chance to submit a substitute plan — which they did. And the Democratic governor, Tom Wolf, was given a chance to reject the plan — which he did.) The map submitted by Republicans probably would have benefited them less than the current map does, but it would still have been better for the GOP than what would be expected based on the partisan makeup of the state. Because the legislature and the governor couldn’t come to an agreement, the court stepped in.

Why was the Republican redistricting not moving the goalposts?

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Mick

Do keep up, Steele got his duff ‘Intel’ from Russians.

We sold it to the US. A great British export. Like Cambridge Analytica who helped sell them Trump.

Originally Posted by Mick

Typical of the pathetic Democrats, changing the goal posts, cheating because they can not win a political race legitimately*. (*These days as per the cheating of Bernie Sanders in the Primaries in 2016, DNC and Hillary campaign paying for Dossier, compiled by Russians).

So something that has been approved by the State Supreme Court, a Federal Court, and the US Supreme Court, is "cheating"?

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Hugh

So something that has been approved by the State Supreme Court, a Federal Court, and the US Supreme Court, is "cheating"?

They're all in on it I tells ya

Originally Posted by Hugh

So something that has been approved by the State Supreme Court, a Federal Court, and the US Supreme Court, is "cheating"?

Come off it. Just because the Higher Judicial system denies hearings, doesn’t mean they approve of something and yes, the Democrats cheat as per their recent scandals coming to light regarding their actions alleged to have occurred in the U.S Election, the real collusion. (i.e DNC & Hillary campaign paying foreign entities, a former British Spy, who in turn got duff info from Russians).

---------- Post added at 11:15 ---------- Previous post was at 11:05 ----------

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

We sold it to the US. A great British export. Like Cambridge Analytica who helped sell them Trump.

There was nothing great about it, the info obtained could not be verified.

I have to ask, this CA issue, wtf would information from UK nationals, help Trump in the U.S win an election in the U.S ?

Makes no sense. Total none story, like it was in 2016 when it was first reported then.

It is the usual bullshit scapegoating for the losers to look for the reasons to why they lost brexit vote and or Hillary losing.

Originally Posted by Mick

Come off it. Just because the Higher Judicial system denies hearings, doesn’t mean they approve of something and yes, the Democrats cheat as per their recent scandals coming to light regarding their actions alleged to have occurred in the U.S Election, the real collusion. (i.e DNC & Hillary campaign paying foreign entities, a former British Spy, who in turn got duff info from Russians).

If you have the time take a look at the article I posted a bit earlier. It shows this is more of a rebalancing after the court found the Republican redistricting from 2011 was gerrymandering.

I’ll look at it.

This CA data thing. Trump phased out using them before election other Republicans, Rubio, Cruz used Cambridge Analytics during their campaign. The Fake News Media won’t run with that, where there is a negative headline where there is a slight tenuous link to Trump, media will run with it full steam ahead. I’d say this was more troublesome for Facebook, given it’s market value seems to have tanked overnight.