President Trump & U.S Election 2016 Investigation

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Maggy J

Found link for you Mick.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/05/p...ley/index.html

Fake News Site .. not valid

[1andrew1]

Originally Posted by Hugh

Why does anyone who doesn’t think Trump is wonderful "for her" - once again, you use the "what about Hillary?" attack.

About a year ago we were joking about the "Oh look, there's Crooked Hillary". Unfortunately, this still seems to be the go-to technique when difficult questions are asked of Trump.

Originally Posted by ianch99

Fake News Site .. not valid

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-immunity.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-immunity.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ail-probe.html

[ianch99]

Originally Posted by Maggy J

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-immunity.html

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-immunity.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...ail-probe.html

Better

Originally Posted by 1andrew1

About a year ago we were joking about the "Oh look, there's Crooked Hillary". Unfortunately, this still seems to be the go-to technique when difficult questions are asked of Trump.

And that is because the news about all her "Crookedness" is still seeping out and Trump goes on about it because she very obviously got away with a federal crime and yet the witch hunt about him is still very much alive despite is being a very obvious hoax set up by the pathetic Democrats. Remember the text from FBI Strzok to Page:

"I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office" -- an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe -- "that there's no way he gets elected -- but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40 . . . . "

Hillary's use of a private email server and then used it to pass Classified emails through it, this violated several Federal Statutes, yet 'Slippery Comey' and biased individuals in the FBI, again that's Strzok and Page and McCabe and even so far as Obama's Attorney General, Lynch who met with President Bill Clinton on a back of a plane while it sat on the tarmac in Phoenix just days before Comey announced they were not indicting Hillary, an indictment for her would invalidate her candidacy for President and they couldn't have that. You would have to be a class A thicko or just plain ignorant, to suggest there was nothing sinister being arranged in that tarmac meeting.

That is why the Inspector General has spent over a year investigating "Improper Considerations" carried out by the FBI during the Investigation of Hillary Clinton. So Trump continues to go on about it because she was obviously guilty, yet she was cleared when she should not have been. They have found nothing on Trump and the Russian hoax is carrying on when NO evidence of any collusion has been found. Indictments have issued to some of Trump's close associates but for crimes totally unrelated to any collusion, plenty of collusion exists from the Democrats though, as they, along with Hillary Clinton, paid for the Dossier that was said to be sourced originally from Russians.

---------- Post added at 23:14 ---------- Previous post was at 22:00 ----------

BREAKING: U.S DEPT. OF JUSTICE Inspector General, Michael Horowitz schedules his OIG Report on allegations of Improper Considerations undertaken by the FBI in advance of the 2016 U.S Election to be released to the public on June 14th (Next Thursday).

[Stephen]

Forget about Hillary. That ship has sailed and it's done with.

And if it doesn’t give the answers Trump wants, he’ll say (as he intimated in a tweet earlier this week) that the ‘deep state’ have fixed it...

I think people are conflating procedural irregularities with criminal acts - it’s likely that it will chastise Comey for his decision to step outside the DOJ chain of command by announcing in July 2016 that Clinton would not be prosecuted, and for re-opening the Clinton case just before the 2016 election after new Clinton emails were discovered on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner, and then closing the case days before the election, because that broke a DOJ normal process that the department refrain from taking any investigative actions that might influence an election.

But that won’t be enough for Trump and the Trumpers - they have decided someone, anyone, is guilty, so unless the report recommends prosecutions, they will whine and moan (and tweet).

---------- Post added 08-06-2018 at 00:00 ---------- Previous post was 07-06-2018 at 23:29 ----------

http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign...-generic-ballo

Democrats hold a nine-point lead over Republicans on the generic House ballot, according to a Fox News poll released Thursday.

According to the survey, 48 percent of voters preferred the Democratic candidate in their House district, compared to 39 percent who preferred the Republican candidate.

That nine-point lead is up from the five-point lead Democrats held in March, the last time Fox News surveyed voters on the matter.

[Chloé Palmas]

Originally Posted by Stephen

Forget about Hillary. That ship has sailed and it's done with.

True but she kept inserting herself in the limelight after the election loss. While she herself is not an excuse for him to justify his mistakes and bad behavior through the race, she kept on seeking attention ever since the loss and kept herself a part of the story. A lot of it also does have relevance. She suffered from the same problem that she has had, her entire life, an inability to keep her mouth shut.

Originally Posted by Stephen

Forget about Hillary. That ship has sailed and it's done with.

No it has not. Rubbish. She broke the law. (And got help to be cleared) !

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by Mick

No it has not. Rubbish. She broke the law. (And got help to be cleared) !

Utter rubbish. No she didn't, and no she wasn't.

I love this just say 'no' and deny everything of Trump supporters, we can all do it ! Simples, a bit like Donald

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by Mick

No it has not. Rubbish. She broke the law. (And got help to be cleared) !

She broke the law? If only there was a politician brave and honest enough to promise to lock her up

[Stephen]

Originally Posted by Mick

No it has not. Rubbish. She broke the law. (And got help to be cleared) !

If she cleared and found not guilty then yes it is over and finished with.

Originally Posted by Stephen

If she cleared and found not guilty then yes it is over and finished with.

Nope. If the findings show she was improperly cleared and they will, the investigation could be re-opened. The law is the law, you cannot just select who it applies to.

[Mr K]

Originally Posted by Mick

Nope. If the findings show she was improperly cleared and they will, the investigation could be re-opened. The law is the law, you cannot just select who it applies to.

Get over it Mick, Hillary is an innocent woman !

She can't being used an excuse for all Donald's mess ups.

Originally Posted by Mr K

Utter rubbish. No she didn't, and no she wasn't.

I love this just say 'no' and deny everything of Trump supporters, we can all do it ! Simples, a bit like Donald

Let's look at the facts shall we.

Classified emails were found on the Anthony Weiners laptop belonging to Hillary Clinton. Antony Weiner was the husband of Huma Abedin, closest Aide to Hillary Clinton.

Antony Weiner's Laptop was not an Authorised and secured device to retain and hold Classified information, neither was Antony Weiner and Huma Abedin an authorised person to see classified information.

The mishandling of Classified Information is a Federal Crime in the U.S, it violates the following Federal Statutes:-

18 U.S.C. § 798 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 798. Disclosure of classified information

(a)  Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information--

(1)  concerning the nature, preparation, or use of any code, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government;  or

(2)  concerning the design, construction, use, maintenance, or repair of any device, apparatus, or appliance used or prepared or planned for use by the United States or any foreign government for cryptographic or communication intelligence purposes;  or

(3)  concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government;  or

(4)  obtained by the processes of communication intelligence from the communications of any foreign government, knowing the same to have been obtained by such processes--

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

AND

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

The ones in Red and bold are the Statutes (Laws) that Hillary violated, yet the FBI cleared her of any wrong doing despite these violations and just labeled her 'extremely careless', in the original draft statement by 'Slippery Comey', he said she was "Grossly Negligent", that was altered and removed because it would have levied a potential indictment.