You are here: Home | Forum | PM Boris forms a government
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
If you’re talking about the previous plans, didn’t the ERG/BJ vote against those plans - does that make them treacherous?
Nope because May’s crap WA isn’t Brexit. Btw, more Remainer MPs voted against it than the ERG.
The Remainer MPs voting against no deal, are treacherous because they’re the ones trying to ruin Boris getting a good deal. Walking away is the best tool to have in any negotiations. If you don’t agree then next time you come to sell your house, I’ll buy it off you for a £1. (Great quote from Question Time Audience member, 12/09/19).
Nope because May’s crap WA isn’t Brexit. Btw, more Remainer MPs voted against it than the ERG.
The Remainer MPs voting against no deal, are treacherous because they’re the ones trying to ruin Boris getting a good deal. Walking away is the best tool to have in any negotiations. If you don’t agree then next time you come to sell your house, I’ll buy it off you for a £1. (Great quote from Question Time Audience member, 12/09/19).
Yes, But if you have already sold your house and have nowhere to live, not such a great deal - you end up spending more money renting somewhere less than you had before, at a greater cost.
The problem with that metaphor is that when you told your wife you were selling your house, you told her the house you intended to buy was better than the current house, and that it would have more rooms and a better outlook - when it came time to move, you didn’t have a new house ready, and what you could get would mean that the driveway would be blocked meaning it would be difficult to get food and medicine into your house, you would have less money to spend as you had to spend money on interim measures to try and sort out the issues with the temporary accommodation, and the mortgage companies wouldn’t agree to a new mortgage because you had a history of defaulting on previous agreements.
__________________ There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it. If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Nope because May’s crap WA isn’t Brexit. Btw, more Remainer MPs voted against it than the ERG.
.
I fear you may need to manage your expectations. I've said it before but the signs now all point to Boris presenting a deal to Parliament very close to May's deal. Certainly, a naive no deal looks dead this year.
---------- Post added at 08:03 ---------- Previous post was at 08:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
Does that make them treacherous?
No, they’re all just hypocrites and liars, so business as usual really
---------- Post added at 08:06 ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
What is (and isn't) Brexit is a revisionist myth to justify no deal. Stop lying to your forum members!
Brexit was leaving the SM, CU & ECJ
Brexit was getting a deal within 2 years for a managed Withdrawl or leaving on WTO terms.
That is exactly what was put forward.
That is exactly what Brexit was, nothing revisionist about it.
---------- Post added at 08:07 ---------- Previous post was at 08:06 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Yes, But if you have already sold your house and have nowhere to live, not such a great deal - you end up spending more money renting somewhere less than you had before, at a greater cost.
The problem with that metaphor is that when you told your wife you were selling your house, you told her the house you intended to buy was better than the current house, and that it would have more rooms and a better outlook - when it came time to move, you didn’t have a new house ready, and what you could get would mean that the driveway would be blocked meaning it would be difficult to get food and medicine into your house, you would have less money to spend as you had to spend money on interim measures to try and sort out the issues with the temporary accommodation, and the mortgage companies wouldn’t agree to a new mortgage because you had a history of defaulting on previous agreements.
Metaphorss and analogies are pointless.
---------- Post added at 08:08 ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
I fear you may need to manage your expectations. I've said it before but the signs now all point to Boris presenting a deal to Parliament very close to May's deal. Certainly, a naive no deal looks dead this year.
Don’t bet the farm.
__________________
The wheel's still turning but the hamsters dead.
Yes it was, and I’m happy to just contradict you all day.
As long as you are happy to be wrong all day. There’s plenty of mentions of Norway before and after 2016, including from the leader of the Brexit Party, and nobody said before the referendum “actually, that’s not an option”.
And by pure concidence, it also made sure the Government's Brexit plans couldn't be scrutinised.
Phew - that was lucky...
They've been discussing Brexit ad nauseum for the last three years! How much more time do they need?
As Boris says, time to get this done.
---------- Post added at 11:06 ---------- Previous post was at 11:04 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
You know full well why it was an issue just as we know full well why Parliament is setting dangerous precedents. We are argue about the mortality of it all but for all of us to pretend this is all normal and parrot the spin of politicians does us no good.
But it isn't even a precedent! Parliament has been prorogued before, and for longer periods on a couple of occasions in the past as well.
I gather you are ok with Bercow setting precedents!
---------- Post added at 11:07 ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian
If there are so many MPs against Brexit why haven't they just voted to revoke A50?
At least that would be an honest way of achieving their goal rather than paralysing parliament........
Quote the full sentence not just the bit that fits your obtuseness.
I’m not being obtuse. You claimed he said one thing that he observably did not.
It’s a somewhat circular argument but at no point did any official documentation or Minister outline prior to the referendum that the “Norway option” wasn’t Brexit. As I’ve said before even Farage, at one point, spoke of the positives.
With his friends taking up £8bn of short positions on the pound though, Norway wouldn’t make profits for disaster capitalism.