Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear attack?
08-05-2018, 11:24
|
#16
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,899
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
But by the time it's changed channel and tuned into it, the delay will probably have passed!
|
Just flick between them using the LastCh button. It's easy to tell which is ahead, especially on the news channels that have a ticker.
I've just checked a few, and in every case the SD channel is ahead (7 seconds ahead in the case of Channel 4). I suspect the MPEG4 encoding processing delay is the biggest factor. ITV HD, which is still MPEG2 in my region, is only very slightly behind the SD version.
Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11
And the award for most pointless thread goes to.........
|
Maybe not entirely pointless. I recall a similar thread many years ago that was started by someone who was into real-time gambling. He liked analogue TV because it had the least delay.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 11:48
|
#17
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,641
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Agreed, SD channels are ahead of HD channels.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 11:48
|
#18
|
Born again teenager.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester. (VM area 20)
Age: 75
Services: Maxit TV, M250 Fibre BB.
Phone-Anytime Chatter
Posts: 13,700
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Off topic in a way but .... If it was possible to get a full 4 minute warning I would love to hear what people would do.
Besides kissing my husband I hope I would have a large cream cake handy that I could consume without worrying about the calories.
__________________
"I intend to live forever, or die trying" - Groucho Marx..... "but whilst I do I shall do so disgracefully." Jo Glynne
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 11:55
|
#19
|
CF Resident Dog
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 14,261
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by muppetman11
And the award for most pointless thread goes to.........
|
I thought that when i saw it last night...... some people just post crap for the sake of posting....
The next thread from him will be, how do you butter your toast or tie your shoe laces! lol
__________________
PSN: Snoopzster
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 13:52
|
#20
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,641
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Personally, I would rather not know and die in ignorant bliss as 4 minutes is not enough time for anything
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 14:16
|
#21
|
Still REIGNING
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hell
Age: 48
Posts: 5,956
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raider999
Personally, I would rather not know and die in ignorant bliss as 4 minutes is not enough time for anything
|
Not what our lass says to me lol
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 14:20
|
#22
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,096
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilincarnate
Not what our lass says to me lol
|
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 14:37
|
#23
|
Perfect Soldier
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Worthing West Sussex
Age: 66
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 10,994
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
The only people that will get a 4 minute warning are the party apparatchiks and their rich friends. Rest of us will die in blissful ignorance. (Probably still watching Jeremy Kyle)
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 15:05
|
#24
|
Believe in yourself ...
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Here & there ...
Services: tv phone mobile broadband V6 and tivo.
Posts: 5,252
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by joglynne
Off topic in a way but .... If it was possible to get a full 4 minute warning I would love to hear what people would do.
Besides kissing my husband I hope I would have a large cream cake handy that I could consume without worrying about the calories.
|
The selfish part of me would want my hubby and son's with me and the unselfish part of me would want my eldest to be with his one true love his fiancée as I know that is what and whom he would want.
__________________
A smile is a curve that sets everything straight.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 15:53
|
#25
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,053
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
Just flick between them using the LastCh button. It's easy to tell which is ahead, especially on the news channels that have a ticker.
I've just checked a few, and in every case the SD channel is ahead (7 seconds ahead in the case of Channel 4). I suspect the MPEG4 encoding processing delay is the biggest factor. ITV HD, which is still MPEG2 in my region, is only very slightly behind the SD version.
Maybe not entirely pointless. I recall a similar thread many years ago that was started by someone who was into real-time gambling. He liked analogue TV because it had the least delay.
|
Cheers for that SP, so my theory has been disproved and the SD channels are the most up to date because of other factors.
Interesting that it could actually be of importance to gamblers.[COLOR="Silver"]
---------- Post added at 15:53 ---------- Previous post was at 15:52 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raider999
Personally, I would rather not know and die in ignorant bliss as 4 minutes is not enough time for anything
|
Me too, the 4 minute warning is totally pointless.
---------- Post added at 15:53 ---------- Previous post was at 15:53 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by weenie
The selfish part of me would want my hubby and son's with me and the unselfish part of me would want my eldest to be with his one true love his fiancée as I know that is what and whom he would want.
|
❤
Last edited by Paul M; 09-05-2018 at 15:09.
Reason: Cut it out.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 16:11
|
#26
|
CF's Worst Nightmare
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Probably outside the M25
Services: Sky Fibre Unlimited 40/10
Posts: 3,473
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
I've just checked a few, and in every case the SD channel is ahead (7 seconds ahead in the case of Channel 4). I suspect the MPEG4 encoding processing delay is the biggest factor. ITV HD, which is still MPEG2 in my region, is only very slightly behind the SD version.
|
I figured encoding would make a difference but wasn't sure how it works out. Although SD has less information, I wondered if it would take longer due to being a higher definition source re-encoded on the fly to lower resolution/bitrate and codec type or something similar.
That would have made the SD slower so obviously not the case but interested to know how the SD/HD channels are actually done and if it all relies on digital hardware or if any old analogue stuff is used.
In the future the answer to which is faster could potentially change according to hardware encoding/decoding and broadcasting specs. 4k could potentially get to someone quicker than SD.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 16:35
|
#27
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,899
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx
That would have made the SD slower so obviously not the case but interested to know how the SD/HD channels are actually done and if it all relies on digital hardware or if any old analogue stuff is used.
|
The answer is "it varies". But I think it's all digital these days.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qtx
In the future the answer to which is faster could potentially change according to hardware encoding/decoding and broadcasting specs. 4k could potentially get to someone quicker than SD.
|
Advanced codecs take longer to encode because they work on many video frames in parallel. The allows them to find common patterns across mutiple frames, and so increase the compression. But the more frames they scan, the more they have to buffer, so the delay increases. It's unlikely to ever get quicker, as this would reduce the compression or compromise picture quality.
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 16:37
|
#28
|
cf.geek
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Near Newcastle upon Tyne
Services: Player tv , V6, phone l, bb 100Meg.
Posts: 901
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
Interesting that it could actually be of importance to gamblers.
|
Think I would rather have the extra delay before I find out I had just blown the mortgage payment on the 2:30 at Kempton
__________________
"If it don't fit don't force it!"
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 16:42
|
#29
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,053
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant
The answer is "it varies". But I think it's all digital these days.
Advanced codecs take longer to encode because they work on many video frames in parallel. The allows them to find common patterns across mutiple frames, and so increase the compression. But the more frames they scan, the more they have to buffer, so the delay increases. It's unlikely to ever get quicker, as this would reduce the compression or compromise picture quality.
|
You never know, over the years they've managed to increase compression efficiencies on Freeview to squeeze in more channels into the same amount of capacity.
---------- Post added at 16:42 ---------- Previous post was at 16:41 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiskilled
Think I would rather have the extra delay before I find out I had just blown the mortgage payment on the 2:30 at Kempton
|
Ha ha, wouldn't it be useful if the bookie was using a two minute delayed system and you weren't 🤗
|
|
|
08-05-2018, 17:14
|
#30
|
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 67
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 42,097
|
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta
On a slightly related note, a couple of milliseconds can make a difference (and a lot of money).
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...-millions.html
Quote:
Lewis, whose previous books include Liar’s Poker and The Big Short, gets inside the world of high-frequency traders (HFTs) who install ultra-fast fibre-optic data connections between their systems and modern stock exchanges, giving them a minuscule speed advantage over rival traders. This advantage, while just milliseconds (thousandths of a second), allows HFTs to see other buyers’ orders before they are executed.
At the most basic level, they use this time advantage to buy the stock before the first deal has been processed and sell it on to the original purchaser at a slightly higher price, a process known as “front-running”...
...What was previously thought of as fast - before 2007 - just wouldn’t cut it for HFTs. What was fast then was the fastest a human could go. Now there was no man in the loop.
“The response of many of them suggested that their entire commercial existence depended on being faster than the rest of the stock market,” writes Lewis revealing that some of them “would sell their grandmothers for a microsecond [a millionth of a second]”.
No wonder that Spread Networks, the company building the fibre-optic connection, proudly boasted: “Round-trip travel time from Chicago to New Jersey has been cut to 13 milliseconds.”
And HFTs were willing to pay through the nose to use it, with the first 200 to sign up forking out $2.8bn between them.
|
__________________
There is always light.
If only we’re brave enough to see it.
If only we’re brave enough to be it.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04.
|