Home News Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear attack?

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media TV Service
Register FAQ Community Calendar

Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear attack?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2018, 20:45   #31
Chris
Trollsplatter
Cable Forum Team
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 36,918
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter View Post
No, it's a light hearted look at how to get your full 4 minutes.
In which case, down 8 pints and make sure you know where your towel is.
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 08-05-2018, 21:42   #32
Qtx
CF's Worst Nightmare
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Probably outside the M25
Services: Sky Fibre Unlimited 40/10
Posts: 3,473
Qtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appeal
Qtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appealQtx has a bronzed appeal
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiderplant View Post
The answer is "it varies". But I think it's all digital these days.


Advanced codecs take longer to encode because they work on many video frames in parallel. The allows them to find common patterns across mutiple frames, and so increase the compression. But the more frames they scan, the more they have to buffer, so the delay increases. It's unlikely to ever get quicker, as this would reduce the compression or compromise picture quality.
Thanks for info.


Makes perfect sense. Key frames and only the differences between frames simplifies what happens a lot and knowing how encoding software can make multiple passes of the same data to get best quality, it's amazing how good some of the on the fly stuff is.


As for fitting more channels in freeview, they can just lower the bitrate of channels to fit more in. Some paid channels in the past looked terrible because they compressed it way too much.


The milliseconds between trading exchanges was a big thing due to the money involved. I vaguely remember a trading scam that relied on the small latency delays of connections between exchanges some years back. Maybe im thinking of some Ocean eleven movie instead
Qtx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2018, 02:03   #33
RichardCoulter
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,052
RichardCoulter has disabled reputation
Re: Is it better to watch an HD news channel in the event of an imminent nuclear atta

They do lower the bit rate to fit more channels onto Freeview, but have improved encoding technology in the past, so hopefully this will continue.

I agree that some of the pictures are shocking though, which is why I think it's better to get Freesat. If I didn't use pay TV i'd get a PVR for both to get the best of both worlds. Having said that most Freeview channels are now on Freesat, so I might just use Freesat as it has more bandwidth available and, therefore, better picture quality.

https://www.tvbeurope.com/production...or-uk-freeview

---------- Post added at 02:03 ---------- Previous post was at 01:45 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by heero_yuy View Post
I would think the first warning we'll get is all the TV and Radio stations go off air simultaneously quickly followed by all electrical power as EMPs take out everything electrical that isn't hardened including all mobile phones.

That's assuming you haven't already gone into orbit with most of your surroundings or been fried to a crisp.

Funnily enough we had a power cut a few days ago and the first thing I checked was to put the radio on battery and see if R4 was still on the air. Maybe it's having lived through an era when a nuclear exchange was a very real threat.
Unfortunately, I think with some of the leaders in the world at this point in time, that the threat is once again increasing.
RichardCoulter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:20.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.