You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.
Further tests are ongoing to increase confidence in the data that suggests a half dose followed by a full dose results in 90% efficacy. They’re concerned that the small sample of people given the half dose were all under 55 years old and might have been expected to show a stronger immune response regardless.
Nonetheless the vaccine has already been put forward for emergency approval.
Just a guess but I would imagine different population groups might get different vaccines and possibly even different dose regimens. If the 'one and a half' regimen works well for under 55s with no evidence to date to show effectiveness for over 55s, that's workable as a 'Tesco Value' vaccine for the general population for under 55s.
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 37,073
Re: Coronavirus
Yup, it makes sense to use the cheap one on most people if it works well amongst them, especially if it also prevents transmission, because that has a knock on benefit to everyone else as well.
Plus it’s only £3 a jab. It’s an absolute gift to the large parts of the world where a high tech, £15-£25-a-go vaccine complete with massive cryogenic storage requirements simply won’t fly.
Trump to sign order aimed at prioritizing Covid-19 vaccine shipment to Americans
President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Tuesday aimed at prioritizing the shipment of the coronavirus vaccine to Americans before other nations, according to senior administration officials.
The signing is slated to take place during a vaccine summit at the White House, with the hope that the order will allay fears that there will not be enough doses of the vaccine to go around after distribution begins.
White House officials described the order as a "reaffirmation of the President's commitment to America first." But on a call with reporters Monday evening, in which administration officials asked not to be identified publicly, the White House did not provide specifics on how the order will do that.
The order comes after The New York Times reported Monday that Pfizer had offered to sell the US government additional doses in late summer, but the newspaper said the administration had turned it down. The decision to not purchase more doses mounted administration concerns that Pfizer would be unable to fulfill any additional US order until June because of the company's commitments to other countries.
Plus it’s only £3 a jab. It’s an absolute gift to the large parts of the world where a high tech, £15-£25-a-go vaccine complete with massive cryogenic storage requirements simply won’t fly.
The Americans won't stop their push against this vaccine though. $3 vs $25 for American companies, this'll get ugly.
---------- Post added at 17:36 ---------- Previous post was at 17:35 ----------
The Yanks don’t need a vaccine, they’ve got Kenneth Copeland.
---------- Post added at 17:40 ---------- Previous post was at 17:40 ----------
(With added Andre Antunes, obvs)
Thanks for that Chris, I think I'm cured of everything known to man and a few things that aren't
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
People with severe allergic reactions warned not to have the vaccine after two reports of adverse reactions.
Source: independent ( i think, flashed up on my phone)
after all that testing.
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
Wonder why this wasn't picked up in the rigorous testing?
__________________
To be or not to be, woke is the question Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer. The slings and arrows of outrageous wokedome, Or to take arms against a sea of wokies. And by opposing end them.
Presumably, because people who do have a history of allergic relations to vaccines don't go to trials of a new vaccine. Apparently, the licence itself states that it should not be given to anyone who has had a previous allergy to vaccines so unless further problems crop up this won't be a big issue for the vaccine roll out.
Services: VM 500M SH3 thingy
in modem mode
XL TV V6 Sony Bravia smart TV and M phone
Posts: 11,018
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Quote from The Sun: People with "significant allergies" have been warned by officials not to take the Covid-19 vaccine.
Two NHS workers who received the landmark Pfizer Covid jab on V Day have suffered allergic reactions needing treatment.
The staff members both had a "significant history of allergic reactions" to the extent where they need to carry an EpiPen or similar device, the NHS confirmed.
They developed symptoms of "anaphylactoid reaction" shortly after receiving the vaccine.
NHS England confirmed both are now recovering and all trusts involved with the vaccination programme have been informed.
Regulators at the MHRA have now warned anyone else with a history of “significant” allergic reactions to medicines, food or vaccines should not receive the jab.
Yesterday they published a list of the potential constituants in the jab that could produce an allergic reaction particularly to eggs.
__________________
History is much like an endless waltz: The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.
However history will change with my coronation - Mariemaia Khushrenada
Presumably, because people who do have a history of allergic relations to vaccines don't go to trials of a new vaccine. Apparently, the licence itself states that it should not be given to anyone who has had a previous allergy to vaccines so unless further problems crop up this won't be a big issue for the vaccine roll out.
'The UK’s drug regulator says anyone with a history of “significant” allergic reactions to food, medicine or vaccines should not currently receive the jab'
Somewhat different from the licence, no?
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......