Gay couple claim they were ejected from pub for kissing

[Gary L]

Originally Posted by Zing

you do all realise " is the symbol for inch not foot? you have been discussing 6 inch lesbians lmao

He might be referring to the size of their heels, or the size of their thingybob

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Hugh, there is a big difference between a gay couple kissing and a man and woman.

No, there isn't - they are both just couples showing affection for one another.

I am embarrassed if I see a couple indulging in full-on groping in public, be they gay or straight; however, that's my problem, not theirs. I have no issues with any most public shows of affection, be they a quick snog, holding hands, hugs, etc.

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

I am a man of the world and have seen everything in my life, but if l was in a pub or in the street for that matter, and l saw a gay couple kissing, that would be embarrasing for myself, as you would not expect it. Men and Women Kissing in the pub or even in the street is natural and happens everday.

Arthur, it would be embarrassing for you - perhaps you need to be more of "a man of the world", as your words don't appear to live up to your actions.

What would you do if you were invited to a Civil Marriage Ceremony - would you object to the couple kissing at the end?

[Mr_love_monkey]

Originally Posted by Zing

you do all realise " is the symbol for inch not foot? you have been discussing 6 inch lesbians lmao

Midget porn!

[Gary L]

Originally Posted by Hugh

No, there isn't - they are both just couples showing affection for one another.

Depends how you look at it. and whether you are using the normal and abnormal thinking part of your brain.

Originally Posted by Gary L

He might be referring to the size of their heels, or the size of their thingybob

I think you may find that if they have a thingybob, they aren't lesbians....

---------- Post added at 10:04 ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 ----------

Originally Posted by Gary L

Depends how you look at it. and whether you are using the normal and abnormal thinking part of your brain.

Have you ever used the normal part of your brain?

You appear to (imho) conflating "different" with "abnormal" - this seems to be quite a recurrent behaviour of yours....

[Kymmy]

Originally Posted by Zing

ok then but there are 3 distinct groups which are different. Homosexual bisexual and heterosexual. If 2 groups are classed as gay then ok but surely a bisexual woman or man is only part time gay because a heterosexual isnt classed as gay so when the bi sexual is having sex with someone of the opposite sex they are not being gay at that time lol

A part time worker is still a worker, a part time troll is still a troll and a part time gay is still gay..

Or perhaps they got past the pre-60's sodomy laws by only being part-time gay!!!

[Russ]

It's pretty straightforward, if a 'persecuted minority' can at leat partially lay claim to being connected to another albeit more publicised group then they will automatically get adopted in to it.

It's why mixed race people such as Barak Obama, Beyonce etc will always be "black".

[Gary L]

Originally Posted by Hugh

I think you may find that if they have a thingybob, they aren't lesbians....

You tell him that.

Have you ever used the normal part of your brain?

No, just the abnormal part.

You appear to (imho) conflating "different" with "abnormal" - this seems to be quite a recurrent behaviour of yours....

is there a difference between normal and abnormal?

well then

Originally Posted by Kymmy

A part time worker is still a worker, a part time troll is still a troll and a part time gay is still gay..

Or perhaps they got past the pre-60's sodomy laws by only being part-time gay!!!

oh I am sorry to frustrate you truly I am. Being neither homosexual or bi sexual I have a limited understanding on how you would like to be classed. I thank you very much for enlightening me to the fact that bi sexuals would like to be classed as gay ( which is actually just a word like queer or poofter thats used and not a proper nomenclature (none of which I use btw) )

So in all fairness to me and my lack of understanding surely when making a statistical analysis of habits should it not be broken down into the 3 groups? Hetero homo and bi ? because here we see what we so often see when using statistics and thats the fact results can be manipulated to prove a certain point.

Hope your head does not hurt to much dear

BTW I am gay when I am happy and jolly and having a good time does that mean you count me too

[Kymmy]

Originally Posted by Zing

oh I am sorry to frustrate you truly I am. Being neither homosexual or bi sexual I have a limited understanding on how you would like to be classed. I thank you very much for enlightening me to the fact that bi sexuals would like to be classed as gay ( which is actually just a word like queer or poofter thats used and not a proper nomenclature (none of which I use btw) )

So in all fairness to me and my lack of understanding surely when making a statistical analysis of habits should it not be broken down into the 3 groups? Hetero homo and bi ? because here we see what we so often see when using statistics and thats the fact results can be manipulated to prove a certain point.

Hope your head does not hurt to much dear

BTW I am gay when I am happy and jolly and having a good time does that mean you count me too

Nah, just a person trying to put correct someone confused.. glad you admit to being gay and I hope you are happy with that choice even if it is just a state of mind

You might be right about the three groups and in an ideal world we wouldn't need any classifications, but as this chit-chat came about from the topic of the surveys which only dictated between two groups of Gay and Not Gay we'll just have to classify you as not bisexual

Originally Posted by Kymmy

Nah, just a person trying to put correct someone confused.. glad you admit to being gay and I hope you are happy with that choice even if it is just a state of mind

You might be right about the three groups and in an ideal world we wouldn't need any classifications, but as this chit-chat came about from the topic of the surveys which only dictated between two groups of Gay and Not Gay we'll just have to classify you as not bisexual

yeah and I openly admit that I did not realise bisexuals also classed themselves gay. I was under the impression gay was only used as a term for those who only have relations with the same sex.

I personally do not see homosexuals and bisexuals as the same so thats where my confussion arose wink wink for good measure

Gay is also used now as a term for something rubbish or stupid or boring etc . Oh the English language

---------- Post added at 10:56 ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 ----------

could someone also clarify a question I asked earlier and it is an honest query as I do not know Is bisexuality also considered a genetic disposition? I know Homosexuals believe ( with some scientific backing ) that they are genetically disposed to be attracted to the same sex. Do bisexuals believe they are genetically disposed to be attracted to both sexes?

[Kymmy]

I never said Bisexuals class themselves as Gay as that's up to the individual and my own classification of them is my own viewpoint, instead you've missed that I said that others will and have classified them as Gay for the purpose of the sexual act with the same gender. The original laws, the survey and most other contexts have all labelled them as Gay..

Originally Posted by Kymmy

I never said Bisexuals class themselves as Gay as that's up to the individual and my own classification of them is my own viewpoint, instead you've missed that I said that others will and have classified them as Gay for the purpose of the sexual act with the same gender. The original laws, the survey and most other contexts have all labelled them as Gay..

so why exactly are you arguing with me winking at me as if your getting one over on me or somehow being clever at my expense? I do not understand ??

What about my question on genetics?

[Stuart]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Hugh, there is a big difference between a gay couple kissing and a man and woman.

I am a man of the world and have seen everything in my life, but if l was in a pub or in the street for that matter, and l saw a gay couple kissing, that would be embarrasing for myself, as you would not expect it. Men and Women Kissing in the pub or even in the street is natural and happens everday.

Arthur, there is no difference at all. It's just two people kissing..

[PeteLockwood]

Originally Posted by Stuart

Arthur, there is no difference at all. It's just two people kissing..

i think there is a big difference.

homosexuality is against nature.. the purpose of sex is to reproduce. two men or two women can not do that, they must respect the rights of those that do not wish to see such actions