Yesterday, 14:55
|
#1306
|
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,973
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Just be careful that someone does not report you all to the thought police for promoting VPN’s.  
__________________
So you all voted for Labour and now you are shocked they resort to stabbing the pensioners and disabled in the back. Shame on you.
Online Safety Bill, The scammers new target.
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 14:56
|
#1307
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 14,913
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
 freedom is no more you're nicked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymoss
yeah but I only have to part with less than £2 a month plus I only use it to bypass geo locks and now this so do not need anything more. If I did I would use Tails
|
Around £1 more each month DOH! Is tails an autocorrect?
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 14:57
|
#1308
|
|
Just a Geek
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,179
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry
Around £1 more each month DOH! Is tails an autocorrect?
|
yeah but I pay monthly that is what I mean I do not have to buy blocks
Tails is a linux based operating system that integrates Tor
__________________
Is your muffin buttered? Would you like me to assign someone to butter your muffin?
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 15:03
|
#1309
|
|
XIV
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Crawley
Age: 35
Services: Three Unlimited
Posts: 14,913
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
You mean a monthly rolling commitment. Digibit was that way for me but it's not worth it at £2.50 monthly.
Your knowledge exceeds mine 
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 15:05
|
#1310
|
|
Just a Geek
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,179
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenry
You mean a monthly rolling commitment. Digibit was that way for me but it's not worth it at £2.50 monthly.
Your knowledge exceeds mine |
I am not committed to anything I just pay £1.50 because I use it sometimes. Do not use it enough to want to pay for blocks and have that size chunk come out of my tight wallet
__________________
Is your muffin buttered? Would you like me to assign someone to butter your muffin?
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 18:34
|
#1311
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SE London (Bexley)
Services: Broadband only (Vivid 300)
Posts: 226
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
Post edited - please see comments above
|
My apologies, I was intending to pick out particular points in the post I was responding to and answer them explicitly, rather than a generic response to the whole lot.
If bold text is not allowed, or reserved for mod comments; is there no ability to block this for ‘normal’ people’s use? It does strike me that it seems to be easy for users to fall fail of this rule innocently.
Just an observation.
__________________
"I believe in an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out"
Arthur Hays Sulzberger
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 18:47
|
#1312
|
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,421
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
My apologies, I was intending to pick out particular points in the post I was responding to and answer them explicitly, rather than a generic response to the whole lot.
If bold text is not allowed, or reserved for mod comments; is there no ability to block this for ‘normal’ people’s use? It does strike me that it seems to be easy for users to fall fail of this rule innocently.
Just an observation.
|
best way to do it is to split the quote up, if you're not sure how that works, you copy and paste the tags which are {QUOTE=user;post}{/QUOTE} but with square brackets instead, around the bit you want to quote and then respond to, and keep going. A bit like it currently looks when you see a post to quote.
Responding inline within the quote does look confusing as to who's said what.
In my experience with forum software especially from the admin/moderator end I'm not sure that the permission to restrict bold text would be possible. It would depend on the option existing within the preferences. I'm sure one of the team would be able to answer that for sure but that's what I'd expect.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 19:21
|
#1313
|
|
Dr Pepper Addict
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nottingham
Age: 62
Services: Aquiss FTTP (900M), Sky Q TV, Sky Mobile, Flextel SIP
Posts: 29,642
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
My apologies, I was intending to pick out particular points in the post I was responding to and answer them explicitly, rather than a generic response to the whole lot.
If bold text is not allowed, or reserved for mod comments;
|
Bold is fine to highlight words, just not whole sentances. 
__________________
 Baby, I was born this way.
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday, 19:35
|
#1314
|
|
Grumpy Fecker
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Warrington
Age: 65
Services: Every Weekend
Posts: 16,973
|
Re: Online Safety Bill Etc
More unconfirmed rumours that scammers have moved quickly on this. Rumours of txt messages pertaining to be OFCOM enforcement quoting the Online Safety Bill demanding payment of a fine for accessing porn online or the police will attend and arrest you.
__________________
So you all voted for Labour and now you are shocked they resort to stabbing the pensioners and disabled in the back. Shame on you.
Online Safety Bill, The scammers new target.
Last edited by Sirius; Yesterday at 20:17.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
