WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
23-04-2013, 00:44
|
#1306
|
Guest
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Crowd was good, most of the show was good though who thought of still having cena as the 'main event' when you've got taker wrestling...
The dubbing team has/had a lot of work to do.
|
|
|
30-04-2013, 17:19
|
#1307
|
Guest
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
WWE have done a deal with Yahoo for a live Raw preshow and a 'brand new' show.
They really should expand their roster with all these shows, Henry wrestled a 4 person gauntlet match, interrupted a match and wrestled a singles at the London tapings, I've found new respect for the guy after that.
|
|
|
30-04-2013, 17:33
|
#1308
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,168
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
I think that was only because the Smackdown show in Cardiff was the same night and for some reason that was over-subscribed with upper-end roster members.
|
|
|
23-05-2013, 08:45
|
#1309
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,168
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Liking Wade Barrett's new entrance music but was there any need to change it...?
|
|
|
23-05-2013, 10:02
|
#1310
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deepest pits of Hell
Age: 40
Posts: 4,964
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Loving the new submission hold of AJ's. Especially as Layla gave her butt a grope Monday night. Now if they could persuade Maryse, Melina and Mickie James back to see them tapping out on AJ's butt that would be me happy.
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 00:20
|
#1311
|
Guest
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Still haven't watched Raw, I'm really bored with it at the moment.
I really hope Money in the Bank does something unexpected but I can foresee Big E & Punk winning the contracts, for the inevitable vs. Ziggler/vs. Cena matches.
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 11:08
|
#1312
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deepest pits of Hell
Age: 40
Posts: 4,964
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Ditto, I go through peaks in watching WWE. I find (personally anyway) WWE tends to be at its best between Rumble and WM. Although this year seemed a little flat to me.
If Big E does win MITB, who will be face, him or Ziggler? Ziggler could be a big face star, certainly if the reaction from the crowd on the RAW after WM was anything to go by. Punk works both as face and heel, but whichever he is I still support him. I think probably the best technical wrestler they have in WWE at the moment.
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 11:26
|
#1313
|
Guest
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Big E would be face I guess, he's great on NXT as one and all the other tanks are currently heel.
Plus Ziggler's class at being heel.
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 11:57
|
#1314
|
Got inside news - PM me
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Media Boy UK HQ
Posts: 15,069
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
An ideal I was thinking about for months.
TNA and WWE do an deal to do two PPV together.
1) King of the Ring (Broadcast team Christy Hemme - Ring announcer, JBL Play-by-play commentator and Mike Tenay Comentator) on an WWE TV PPV night (PG Rated)
2) Queen of the Ring - Uncut (Broadcast team Justin Roberts - Ring announcer, Tazz Play-by-play commentator and Jerry Lawler Comentator) on an TNA TV PPV night (Rated R)
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 12:44
|
#1315
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Deepest pits of Hell
Age: 40
Posts: 4,964
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Like the Diva idea MB. Think I had best go for a cold shower before I get too worked up over the idea.
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 13:04
|
#1316
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Half in the corporeal, half in the etheral
Posts: 37,168
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Am I the only one totally underwhelmed by Big E? He seems nothing more than a generic 'big man'. And not a very tall one at that.
|
|
|
24-05-2013, 13:30
|
#1317
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Leeds
Age: 63
Services: Don't have a clue any more.
Posts: 7,523
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ
Am I the only one totally underwhelmed by Big E? He seems nothing more than a generic 'big man'. And not a very tall one at that.
|
I also don't think he is anything special to be honest, don't think he is that good a wrestler either.
|
|
|
25-05-2013, 19:30
|
#1318
|
Sceptic
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,666
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
|
|
|
25-05-2013, 21:34
|
#1319
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England Uk
Services: Telewest Phone
Telewest BroadBand
Telewest Digital Tv
v+ HD
Posts: 4,089
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
Is that the last of us seeing undertaker now till next year?
|
|
|
26-05-2013, 18:30
|
#1320
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Leeds
Age: 63
Services: Don't have a clue any more.
Posts: 7,523
|
Re: WWE (no spoilers for 24 hours)
I hope not but sadly it wouldn't suprise me
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:30.
|