Madeleine McCann

[slug]

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Do you even need to ask that, what's your next question, was the Pope in on it?

The local church is a location under suspicion because the McCanns had been given the keys by the local priest, also at about the time Maddie went missing new paving slams were laid.

[Pia]

Originally Posted by slug

The local church is a location under suspicion because the McCanns had been given the keys by the local priest, also at about the time Maddie went missing new paving slams were laid.

Do you have a link to that info?

[slug]

Originally Posted by TheDaddy

Do you even need to ask that, what's your next question, was the Pope in on it?

Originally Posted by Pia

Do you have a link to that info?

Martin Brunt (sky news) has mentioned it a couple of times, but I cant find it in print. I will have a better look later.

[Gareth]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

.....they loved there kids, now if they did anything to Maddie....

Apparently not enough to want their presence to ruin their evenings out wining and dining with friends.

Whilst we're playing at armchair detectives, here are some key questions that need considering:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2422967.ece

[TheDaddy]

Originally Posted by slug

The local church is a location under suspicion because the McCanns had been given the keys by the local priest, also at about the time Maddie went missing new paving slams were laid.

I was actually referring to the surly any preist would reoprt this to the authorities imo the question didn't need to be asked, as for alleging that's where her body was hidden, why not, if she is dead the body was kept somewhere

[Daffy Duck]

[quote=Arthurgray50@blu;34394462]Hello Peanutkp, Thank you for your comment, No, l believe that, l read about the people, the facts, and what l hear from TV news, especially Sky News, The way l look at is quite simple, IF, and it is a big IF, they did kill Maddie, either by accident, or intentionly, would you seriously stay in the Country, you would want to get out asap, they stayed in Portugal for FOUR months, they VOLUNTEERED to help the police, they loved there kids, now if they did anything to Maddie, why didn't they harm the other two, IF Kate(the parent) was the last to visit Maddie, why wasn't there anxious feeling or blood appearnce on view when she went back to the restuarant, this is where to start from, and also it is claimed that they hired a car 25 days after she went missing, wouldn't they show signs of anxiety in between, and don't forget they were followed by tv crews, all the time. l should be a detective.

I wouldn't become a detective if i were you, lets look at it a different way, if they had scooted back to England and/or not volunteered to help the police that wouldn't have been the actions of someone who's child had been abducted......they would have had to stay and to help the police just to promote their cover story. So their actions aren't any evidence that they're telling the truth nor is it evidence they're lying....it means nothing either way

Arthur believe me i want that little girl found alive but there is hope and there is optimism to the point of stupidity. you say why didn't they kill or harm the other two children but that also stands for an abductor why did the abductor take the child that could stand out the most. There is no question whatsoever that the priest would not have anything to do with something like this although the confessional is something that can be hard for some catholic priests and if i am correct he would have to get special permission to disclose anything that might have been said in confession.

The point of where the body could have been hidden for 25 days is valid but if as is being suggested certain types of DNA material were found in the spare tyre well becomes irrelevent in as much as she must have been in there somehow. I don't listen to or read a word of team mc'canns version of events as i have not believed a word from them since very early on when most if not all their initial statements and accounts have been proved incorrect.

[Saaf_laandon_mo]

I read that the decsion whether to allow money from MAddies fund to be used in any defence costs will be reached today. Although two of the directors of the fund cannot vote on this issue as they are direct family members, the other 4 are close friends of the McGanns. Their decision should be interesting.

It has also been reported that there have been calls from some donators to refund their money if it is going to be used in this manner.

I for one do not think the money should be used by them for paying lawyers in a case where they are being accused of murder, manslaughter, accidental death etc etc Maddie.

No shouldn't be used. Your right the decision should be interesting.

I think it would be a very big mistake for them to use the fund for their defence and would anger many people.

According to the Daily Mail, the object that the prosecuter urgently wants, is Kate McCann's diary.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...e_id=1811&ct=5

.

[Mr_love_monkey]

That strikes me as particually stupid - what do they expect to find?

03/05/7 - Dear Diary,
Today could have gone better, what with the accidental killing and hiding of the body of our daughter.....

30/05/07 - Dear Diary,

Decided to move the body...

[punky]

Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey

That strikes me as particually stupid - what do they expect to find?

03/05/7 - Dear Diary,
Today could have gone better, what with the accidental killing and hiding of the body of our daughter.....

30/05/07 - Dear Diary,

Decided to move the body...

While I think that your post is funny, Seizing the diary could be very useful. It could yield pieces of information that discredit things Mrs McCann said under whatever the Portugese-version of caution is (Arguida I presume), with regard to times, what was said, etc.

I'm suprised they made it public before securing the diary, as 'accidents' might happen.

[Osem]

Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey

That strikes me as particually stupid - what do they expect to find?

More likely something which contradicts certain evidence the McCanns have given.

Originally Posted by RizzyKing

I think it would be a very big mistake for them to use the fund for their defence and would anger many people.

We're not confusing accusation with guilt here by any chance are we?