Re-classification Of Cannabis
29-01-2004, 21:06
|
#106
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lancs
Posts: 290
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Getting high is miles better than being ****ed...
no reason why cannibis is illegal imho, people get stoned and chill out... when some people are ****ed they turn aggressive.
free the weed
Gonna buy some for this weekend and walk down the street smoking it and see what happens
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:08
|
#107
|
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Mod
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 74
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,378
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Getting high is miles better than being ****ed...
no reason why cannibis is illegal imho, people get stoned and chill out... when some people are ****ed they turn aggressive.
free the weed
Gonna buy some for this weekend and walk down the street smoking it and see what happens
|
Please do us a favour and don't ever drive/ride a bike/horse whilst under the fluence.Thanks.
Incog.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:25
|
#108
|
|
-
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere
Services: Virgin for TV and Internet, BT for phone
Posts: 26,546
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Incognitas
Please do us a favour and don't ever drive/ride a bike/horse whilst under the fluence.Thanks.
Incog. 
|
Seems that may be more common than you would think
http://www.itv.com/news/429580.html
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:37
|
#109
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Gonna buy some for this weekend and walk down the street smoking it and see what happens
|
If spotted by the police you should be arrested and your canibis confiscated.
Using it in public place is illegal according to the tax payer funded ad in the newspaper today.
As someone who's never seen the need to smoke cigs let alone do anything stronger (canibis when smoked near me just gives me a stinking headache), could any users who feel able please explain to me why you need to do it?
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:39
|
#110
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xaccers
.
Using it in public place is illegal according to the tax payer funded ad in the newspaper today.
|
Thats nice, I'm glad I helped pay for that
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:40
|
#111
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scastle
|
Quote:
|
The study of 100 regular and 90 casual users of cannabis found 74 per cent admitted getting into their cars while under the influence of the drug. This was despite 70 per cent saying they believed that using it had impaired their driving ability
|
'Cin ******s
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:41
|
#112
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
Thats nice, I'm glad I helped pay for that 
|
Don't forget you helped pay for the study into whether it should be reclacified.
The ads alone cost £1milli on
Take your pick of the other places that money could have been better spent.
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 00:43
|
#113
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xaccers
Don't forget you helped pay for the study into whether it should be reclacified.
The ads alone cost £1milli on
Take your pic of the other places that money could have been better spent.
|
Don't get me started
Labour, you bunch of *user edit*
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 01:00
|
#114
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
Don't get me started
Labour, you bunch of *user edit* 
|
So, to recap
canibis is now a class C drug
the police themselves are now confused
users are now confused (ok they were probably confused before, but only when smoking it)
over £1milli on has been spent
it's still illegal
the law says you will still get arrested
So what exactly was the point of reclasifying it?
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 01:04
|
#115
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xaccers
So, to recap
canibis is now a class C drug
the police themselves are now confused
users are now confused (ok they were probably confused before, but only when smoking it)
over £1milli on has been spent
it's still illegal
the law says you will still get arrested
So what exactly was the point of reclasifying it?
|
To show that we have a 'right on, groovy' kind of government?
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 01:06
|
#116
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
To show that we have a 'right on, groovy' kind of government? 
|
I've just had a thought.
Perhaps this is to prevent TB embarassment when his son his caught with canibis?
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 01:09
|
#117
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tonbridge
Age: 59
Services: Amazon Prime Video & Netflix. Deregistered from my TV licence.
Posts: 21,960
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xaccers
I've just had a thought.
Perhaps this is to prevent TB embarassment when his son his caught with canibis?
|
Probably has been already but they are waiting for the right moment to let the news out....
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 01:16
|
#118
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ramrod
Probably has been already but they are waiting for the right moment to let the news out.... 
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TB
Ewan's canibis use is only in the home at number 10, is now legal and above board (big grin, concerned look)
|
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 03:34
|
#119
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xaccers
They came up with a fantastic idea which on paper looked good, but neglected to take into account what people are like when they've just injected heroine into their viens.
I don't think it was Amsterdam, but one of the other dams,
|
Well the only reference I can find after a few minutes googling is to an experiment in Switzerland, not The Netherlands, and AFAIK the Swiss don't have the same "tolerance policy" to cannabis that the Dutch do, so I don't see this as a valid comparison.
If you have any cites relating to Holland I'd welcome you posting them.
|
|
|
|
30-01-2004, 04:08
|
#120
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 49
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: Re-classification Of Cannabis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Graham
Well the only reference I can find after a few minutes googling is to an experiment in Switzerland, not The Netherlands, and AFAIK the Swiss don't have the same "tolerance policy" to cannabis that the Dutch do, so I don't see this as a valid comparison.
If you have any cites relating to Holland I'd welcome you posting them.
|
Can you post the links you've found as I may be wrong, I think it was about 10 years ago. I know it wasn't amsterdam (I remember at the time being suprised Amsterdam wasn't used), but have a sneeking suspicion it was Rotterdam
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:02.
|