Speed Increases 1st June - 2meg to 4meg
16-06-2006, 18:39
|
#1156
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
LOL, York aint that bad, we even have our own version of the london eye now. Still wish we had the 4mb instead lol
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 19:01
|
#1157
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
WooYay! Woot! Etc.
Walthamstow (London E17) has been upgraded:
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 17:59:05 GMT
1st 512K took 1331 ms = 384.7 KB/sec, approx 3170 Kbps, 3.1 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1481 ms = 345.7 KB/sec, approx 2849 Kbps, 2.78 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1290 ms = 396.9 KB/sec, approx 3270 Kbps, 3.19 Mbps
4th 512K took 901 ms = 568.3 KB/sec, approx 4683 Kbps, 4.57 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 3493 Kbps, 3.41 Mbps
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 20:13
|
#1158
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DerekRothwell
|
You're wrong... York DID have running water a few years ago.... running through the streets, and running through the houses 
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 20:28
|
#1159
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 32
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kitcar
WooYay! Woot! Etc.
Walthamstow (London E17) has been upgraded:
|
What? where's my upgrade in Leyton E10.
I don't mind though. Apart from a few days this year and last the 2MB service has been fantastic, always full speed.
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 21:16
|
#1160
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 251
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mills04
Same, still waiting here in Worthing as well, ugh. I want faster broadband  |
I think we all want faster broadband 
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 21:33
|
#1161
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by topcreator
I think we all want faster broadband |
...and once again, 15 year old Mr TopCreator completely misses the sarcasm! 
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 22:02
|
#1162
|
|
cf.addict
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 251
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sp3ctre
...and once again, 15 year old Mr TopCreator completely misses the sarcasm! |
I am not 15 years old & I am aware of the sarcasm, i am only answering it
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 22:45
|
#1163
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Knaresborough UK
Age: 46
Services: 100mb BB
TiVo 500gb
TV L
Phone - Evening / Weekends
Posts: 833
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by topcreator
I am not 15 years old & I am aware of the sarcasm, i am only answering it
|
oooh I so could - lol but I wont.
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 22:59
|
#1164
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Swindon..center of the M4 corridor
Age: 63
Services: Virgin 20Mb CM, Sky+, TV Drive
Posts: 676
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Upgraded to 4MB now!
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 23:16
|
#1165
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brighton
Age: 77
Services: NTL
Posts: 44
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by topcreator
According to post 1008 Brighton has already been upgraded ( link) but i'm in Worthing using a Samsung STB and i haven't been upgraded yet |
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 22:15:11 UTC
1st 512K took 2188 ms = 234 KB/sec, approx 1928 Kbps, 1.88 Mbps
2nd 512K took 2156 ms = 237.5 KB/sec, approx 1957 Kbps, 1.91 Mbps
3rd 512K took 2188 ms = 234 KB/sec, approx 1928 Kbps, 1.88 Mbps
4th 512K took 2171 ms = 235.8 KB/sec, approx 1943 Kbps, 1.9 Mbps
NO - still no change! (23:20)
Overall Average Speed = approx 1939 Kbps, 1.89 Mbps
Not this bit of Brighton - but I'll try another re-boot and then test again.
|
|
|
|
|
16-06-2006, 23:21
|
#1166
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chrisjones
oooh I so could - lol but I wont.
|
oooh, but soooo tempting innit?
Still want 4 Meg though!!!!!!! (proper baiting him now, aren't we?)
|
|
|
|
|
17-06-2006, 00:15
|
#1167
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 13
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Erskine ( Renfrew ) is done! 
Quote:
Fri, 16 Jun 2006 23:13:29 GMT
1st 512K took 1042 ms = 491.4 KB/sec, approx 4049 Kbps, 3.95 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1092 ms = 468.9 KB/sec, approx 3864 Kbps, 3.77 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1091 ms = 469.3 KB/sec, approx 3867 Kbps, 3.78 Mbps
4th 512K took 1102 ms = 464.6 KB/sec, approx 3828 Kbps, 3.74 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 3902 Kbps, 3.81 Mbps
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-06-2006, 07:16
|
#1168
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 544
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sp3ctre
oooh, but soooo tempting innit?
Still want 4 Meg though!!!!!!! (proper baiting him now, aren't we?) |
Well, don't. It ain't funny and you'll just get yourself banned.
|
|
|
|
|
17-06-2006, 08:06
|
#1169
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 83
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
oh c'mon!.. why so uptight? was just having a laugh because every time someone posts that they want 4 meg he (predictably ,like clockwork) posts "you will have to wait".... just found that amusing, that's all... it's all in the name of fun while we're waiting, so relax please!
|
|
|
|
|
17-06-2006, 08:54
|
#1170
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 503
|
Re: New Speeds - June 1st
Churlish to complain perhaps, while others have not yet had the upgrade.
But here in Reading, whilst we gone up a notch
Sat, 17 Jun 2006 07:50:55 UTC
1st 512K took 1500 ms = 341.3 KB/sec, approx 2812 Kbps, 2.75 Mbps
2nd 512K took 1609 ms = 318.2 KB/sec, approx 2622 Kbps, 2.56 Mbps
3rd 512K took 1625 ms = 315.1 KB/sec, approx 2596 Kbps, 2.54 Mbps
4th 512K took 1563 ms = 327.6 KB/sec, approx 2699 Kbps, 2.64 Mbps
Overall Average Speed = approx 2682 Kbps, 2.62 Mbps
I've seen nothing beginning with a 3.xx yet
Not quite the 4meg we had thought we might get, maybe it true what some said, that the network just couldn't cope
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:38.
|
Join CF
You are here: 
