50M Think Broadband Ping Monitor Results (POST YOURS) - Page 73

craigj2k12 · 10-03-2012, 16:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

Links or it didn't happen.

It did happen, im trawling though google searched ripping my hair out trying to find it, theres some info in this thread around page 30ish, but breif, I definitley opened a thread about this and im determined to find it lol

Kymmy · 10-03-2012, 16:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12

It did happen, im trawling though google searched ripping my hair out trying to find it, theres some info in this thread around page 30ish, but breif, I definitley opened a thread about this and im determined to find it lol

Click on this link and it'll show you all the threads that you've ever started (not posts just threads)

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/se...&starteronly=1

thenry · 10-03-2012, 16:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy

It wasn't for my benefit, Just posted the whole lot as people might be interested especially as I was asked to post the TBB monitors, but instead it's the Anti-superhub so called experts who jump on it and deem it not good enough.. If someone doesn't like the superhub then don't get a superhub!!

I rarely game, I don't care about 2 more seconds to load a web page and most of my traffic is purely files and database sharing with various applications which are all running at full speed..

Everyone to their own but don't expect others to care about non-perfect results unless it actually impacts on what they're using the connection for

yes I asked because your 8 down channels got me curious.

its not about being anti superhub. theres a simple cure for it if VM pull their finger out. why make a multi million pound investment in something then accept a simple fixable flaw?

your being a little arrogant and pathetic

Kymmy · 10-03-2012, 16:17

And what qualifies you to specify that there is a simple cure? Are you a software engineer or a circuit designer?? Or is that your arrogance speaking??

thenry · 10-03-2012, 16:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy

And what qualifies you to specify that there is a simple cure? Are you a software engineer or a circuit designer?? Or is that your arrogance speaking??

no its actually me complimenting those who are educated. they have the brains to implement a fix.

Kymmy · 10-03-2012, 16:21

But how do you know it's a simple fix? (is this a bit like your cloners simple fix??) Qasi, you're probably one of the most qualified (my digital electronics experience doesn't quite go to that level)

thenry · 10-03-2012, 16:24

ok fair enough I don't know its a simple fix, I haven't a clue how to code but surely its achievable.

Kymmy · 10-03-2012, 16:24

thenry · 10-03-2012, 16:28

qasdfdsaq · 10-03-2012, 16:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy

But how do you know it's a simple fix? (is this a bit like your cloners simple fix??) Qasi, you're probably one of the most qualified (my digital electronics experience doesn't quite go to that level)

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but until I actually see any proof of the problem or understand what it is, I can't conclusively say anything other than one connection has higher latency than the other...

I think the next OFCOM broadband report will probably be the best set of and biggest set of figures we get for this - we'll have two mostly superhub-only tariffs (30mb and 100mb) with the tariff with highest proportion of VMNG300 users sandwiched between them, and all running on the same (DOCSIS 3) network.

Chrysalis · 10-03-2012, 20:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kymmy

It wasn't for my benefit, Just posted the whole lot as people might be interested especially as I was asked to post the TBB monitors, but instead it's the Anti-superhub so called experts who jump on it and deem it not good enough.. If someone doesn't like the superhub then don't get a superhub!!

I rarely game, I don't care about 2 more seconds to load a web page and most of my traffic is purely files and database sharing with various applications which are all running at full speed..

Everyone to their own but don't expect others to care about non-perfect results unless it actually impacts on what they're using the connection for

What I will expect from your 2 graphs is the 10meg to be generally more responsive so websites will be snappier, things like VOIP will be better, gaming better. The only thing the 50meg probably beats your 10meg on is thoughput.

Kymmy · 14-03-2012, 21:20

Interesting how downloading at full speed on one modem can effect the ping response on the other. I had the newsgroups going this morning on the 50Mb at about 8am and you can see a rise in the ping on the 2nd graph on the 10Mb

50Mb

10Mb

Chrysalis · 14-03-2012, 21:22

I would expect that if on the same channels as the shared channels arent that large, however your graphs are so different I assumed one is docsis1 and the other is docsis3 so not the same channels.

Kymmy · 14-03-2012, 21:24

You are correct with the Docsis..

Martin_D · 15-03-2012, 01:14

Uddingston has the new 5mb upload speed

Attachment 23256

Primary Upstream Service Flow
Upstream(0)
SFID 10675
Max Traffic Rate 5140000 bps
Max Traffic Burst 8160 bytes
Mix Traffic Rate 0 bps
Max Concatenated Burst 8160 bytes
Scheduling Type Best Effort