15-04-2010, 10:28
|
#91
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Are we really going to get a debate though? Or are we going to get little more than a series of short pre-prepared speeches from each party leader in succession? From what little I've heard about the format I don't see much chance of lively off-the-cuff debate.
I still haven't decided who I'm voting for but it won't be for more of the same old lies, spin, hypocrisy, sleaze, nepotism, ineptitude, etc., etc...
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:39
|
#92
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,156
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:44
|
#93
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
|
Of course he is, after all, Brown single-handedly "saved the world" and "broke the cycle of boom and bust" before even having his Weetabix.....
They're really struggling if that's what they're forced to rely on...
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:46
|
#94
|
Remoaner
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 32,719
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
|
The amount of bias in that article is unbelievable  , I don't know why people buy these papers expecting 'news'.
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:48
|
#95
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,156
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
Of course he is - Brown singe-handedly "saved the world" and "broke the cycle of boom and bust" before even having his Weetabix.....
They're really struggling if that's what they're forced to rely on...
|
I beleive the line was 'and we not only saved the world' hinting at other un-worldy things also saved by His Awesomness
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:48
|
#96
|
Trollsplatter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,068
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
|
The answer to this, of course, is simple. A lot of people, me included, at one time had great respect for Brown's apparent prowess as chancellor. But a couple of things have since come to light.
1. He wasn't an iron chancellor. His ineptitude was merely being masked by the very banking sector bubble that he ought to have been regulating to prevent, and which was eventually the downfall of us all.
2. He's not the chancellor any more. He's the Prime Minister. And in that job he has not at any time managed to build up a positive reputation.
I doubt very much whether anyone is planning to bring up Cameron's former praise for Brown in tonight's debate.
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:53
|
#97
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
While we're on the subject of embarrassing clangers, who said this do you reckon?
Quote:
A weak currency is a sign of a weak economy and a weak government.
|
Answers (including the above quote) on a postcard to No 10 Downing Street,....
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:56
|
#98
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,156
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
The amount of bias in that article is unbelievable  , I don't know why people buy these papers expecting 'news'.
|
Meh you actually read the article.
I think I am going to refer to Gordon as His Awesomness from now on though.
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 10:59
|
#99
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Meh you actually read the article.
I think I am going to refer to Gordon as His Awesomness from now on though.
|
Don't forget to:
when you hear or speak his name.....
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 12:01
|
#100
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
The difference in reactions to the LibDem manifesto interested me, we had Labour doing their usual soundbites and slurs, and Cameron saying "If libdem voters want *list of things in the LD manifesto* then they should vote conservative as we're bringing them in too" and no slurring of the LD's, and actually, the interviews I've heard with Cameron, he's not slurred the other parties.
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 12:09
|
#101
|
Trollsplatter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,068
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
I've spent a long time doing the most comprehensive version of the survey at voteforpolicies.org.uk this morning ... and apparently my personal politics looks like this:
http://vfp.me/4BC6F2B28FEC5
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 12:13
|
#102
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Right here!
Posts: 22,315
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
I see Prescott's been accused of playing 'dirty' too:
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/61924,...dword-campaign
Well what have we come to expect from these people?..
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 13:00
|
#103
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Age: 44
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osem
|
No doubt he'll claim that his account was 'hacked' and he's actually innocent. They always do.
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 13:19
|
#104
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milling around Milton Keynes
Age: 48
Posts: 12,969
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
I've spent a long time doing the most comprehensive version of the survey at voteforpolicies.org.uk this morning ... and apparently my personal politics looks like this:
http://vfp.me/4BC6F2B28FEC5
|
I got 50% Tory, 25% UKIP and 25% LibDem
|
|
|
15-04-2010, 14:51
|
#105
|
Inactive
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dystopia
Services: || (XL) Broadband ||
(XL) Nuisance Call Hotline ||
Posts: 262
|
Re: The 2010 General Election Thread: Week 2
Leanings?
Add in the UKIP portion and you're 70% fascist!
Looks like the Greens are appealing most to people's sentimentalities (visitors to that site at least), but probably not to their votes, when it comes to the crunch.
I played the game of guessing which policies belonged to which party, dodging the obvious electioneering and ludicrous promises.
Now I'm totally confused, especially since I advocated voting Lib-Dem!!
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:34.
|