Operation Yewtree

Originally Posted by MarkC1984

Still living in fear my favourites will be the next ones arrested. Be a very sad day if the Chuckle Brothers are ever arrested.

To me to you to me to you oh no

[spreadsheet]

the upshot of it all is that its all the old boy network. who knew who at cambridge university and nods and winks at various golf courses. and it was ever thus

Erm, neither Rolf Harris or Jimmy Saville went to Cambridge (or Oxford), and I don't believe either of them played golf.....

[Russ]

I've heard through the grapevine that a certain person - and I'm making no hints, suggestions or implications of who it is - had "inappropriate" moments with a fan a long time ago but a few years ago (and previous to Yewtree) wrote that person a letter expressing regret and shame for what what they did and offered unreserved apologies.

The victim supposedly allowed this person to believe that the letter was the end of the matter but when Yewtree kicked off they took it to the police who apparently looked at it as a confession-of-sorts.

[spreadsheet]

Originally Posted by Hugh

Erm, neither Rolf Harris or Jimmy Saville went to Cambridge (or Oxford), and I don't believe either of them played golf.....

am not talking about them - am citing the people in authority who chose to turn blind eyes and cover the issues up

But why would they cover up for those who hadn't gone to Oxbridge or played golf with them?

[Russ]

I think it's all about 'reputation'. One of the reasons I think the Catholic Church has covered up so much of its abuse is to 'protect the reputation' as they probably feel the subsequent fall-out stemming from a worldwide loss of face outweighs the necessity to see the guilty parties brought to justice. Same with the BBC and probably a lot of other massive institutions.

[Russ]

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...se-arrest.html

[Derek]

Strewth!

Not really a world exclusive when pretty much everyone with a Facebook or twitter account has known for months by the amount of jokes and comments flying about.

[Russ]

A mate works in the news department of a local radio station and has seen the details of some super injunctions of certain people and says there are a few more circulating...

[spreadsheet]

I stated before that the wobble board wielding weirdo was having his collar felt but my comments were largely derided

[MovedGoalPosts]

Anybody else think it is unfair that people are named when they have simply been questioned and not even charged, yet alone convicted? Yes the alleged offences are serious. Yes by naming someone there is a probability that others may come forward. But, trial should be in court, not the media, and whatever we may say, mud sticks and once "outed" in public the stigma will remain, even if no further action is taken.

I'm not surprised therefore there are rumours of super-injunctions.

Originally Posted by spreadsheet

I stated before that the wobble board wielding weirdo was having his collar felt but my comments were largely derided

I am confused - I have looked at this thread, and can't find any 'derision'...

Unless you count someone hoping that the due process of law is followed as 'being derided'?, such as Paul's post

The fact someone has been arrested for questioning does not make them guilty of anything.

Originally Posted by spreadsheet

I stated before that the wobble board wielding weirdo was having his collar felt but my comments were largely derided

If there was any derision, was it possibly for the manner of your posting rather than its factual content?

[Russ]

Originally Posted by heero_yuy

The BBC R4 news this morning stated that they had not been able to name the celebrity before for legal reasons. How many of these super injuctions are protecting the (potentially) guilty?

If what my mate says is correct there are a few more.