Imogen Shows True Colours - Page 5

Ramrod · 16-12-2006, 21:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

I really don't see the problem. Kronas seems to be under the impression that doing an underwear photoshoot is somehow immoral (as is his right) and that the comments in that interview are in some way worse than those featured in any other interview.

I'd disagree with her being immoral......only a bit of a tart....but good for her; girls gotta make ends meet....

Quote:

Or is the fact she's my friend the issue?

I suspect thats the reason

Russ · 16-12-2006, 21:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by zinglebarb

again dude I dont mean any offence in this but its simply only blown up on here as it has cuz your here and I dont mean that against you

I agree completely - had I kept it to myself that I knew her then I'm sure whatever motived the OP to post this would not have occured

Stuart · 16-12-2006, 21:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by kronas

in russ's words........

now if thats how you comment and talk about taking pictures of a freind then im definately under the wrong impression that the maxim interview is ok

He took pictures of a friend he fancies in a bikini? Maybe we'll have to agree to disagree, but I still don't see a problem.

16-12-2006, 21:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

I agree completely - had I kept it to myself that I knew her then I'm sure whatever motived the OP to post this would not have occured

maybe not the OP but it would have been looked at and finished by now

kronas · 16-12-2006, 21:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

I really don't see the problem. Kronas seems to be under the impression that doing an underwear photoshoot is somehow immoral (as is his right) and that the comments in that interview are in some way worse than those featured in any other interview. Everyone is entitled to their views obviously, I just don't see what singles out Imogen for the special treatment. She's not done anything worse than hundred of other women in her position in the past surely? Or am I missing something due to being biased in favour of my friend? Or is the fact she's my friend the issue?

i wasent really emphasising the shoot so much, but the interview responses.

oh and my views are not really active because russ knows her but public perception and portrayal of the person in question.

gooner4life · 16-12-2006, 21:37

I dont see what the issue is to be honest? so she made a dirty tape with her then boyfriend, it's not like she's the only one, ive made a couple myself, the pictures are standard attractive famous woman posing in lingerie shots, she looks pretty damn good imo.

The answers to the questions show she has a bit more personality than what she showed on big brother as well.

Fair play Imogen.

skyblueheroes · 16-12-2006, 23:48

Fair play to her. She'll be a no-one in a few months. Get the money while she can. Wonder if her video was 'leaked'.

She's making a habit of taking her clothes off !

carlingman · 17-12-2006, 03:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by zinglebarb

no offence but you do that all the time~(suggest your morally correct that is). In the thread over the video you were quite hard on a number of members who expressed there views and you were adamant that she would never do such a thing. Now in this thread you even tell you photgraphed her in a suggestive manner so what are we ment to see in that? I have not wanted to say anything cuz your a mod and in the far distant past we have had our set to but I frankly just dont understand

Well I am with Zing on this one as he is quite correct, Russ adopted the moral high ground on the original thread claiming it was not her then backed down when it was proved it was.

I posted a few comments in that very thread disputing the tracts of her as I personally know her brother Aled and for that I was then challenged.

Fellow Mods/Admin stepped in to question me and ex Mods/Admin also raised some valid points.

It was deemed that I could not personally know her or any of her family but they also failed to aim the same questions to Russ so I took that to mean only Mods/Admin of the site can dare to know people personally and stepped away.

A lot of double standards here me thinks as one minute it is stated she would not do anything to harm her TV presenter career as she wanted to be a childrens TV presenter then the next minute it is anything to keep her in the limelight.

To me she realised her dream was and has been shattered and is now on a crusade to do anything to keep herself in the lime light.

Can't blame her for that.

Personally I think if Russ had not backed her and mentioned her as a personal friend then this thread would have not come to the fore as it is a opportunity for the original poster to have a i told you so dig.

CycoSymz · 17-12-2006, 06:38

Well, i maybe missing the point, but she looks damn fine in the photo's. So what's the problem.
If that's what she needs to do to get the money flowing in, then fair play to her.

Russ · 17-12-2006, 07:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlingman

Well I am with Zing on this one as he is quite correct, Russ adopted the moral high ground on the original thread claiming it was not her then backed down when it was proved it was.

I have never adopted any moral high ground - if I had, my reasons for saying she wouldn't do it would have been based on my own standards.

However as you are well aware, my reasons for saying it wasn't her was because she had told a mutual friend she'd never do it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by carlingman

I posted a few comments in that very thread disputing the tracts of her as I personally know her brother Aled and for that I was then challenged.

No, you didn't say you personally knew him - one of the team asked you how you know him and you never answered.

Pia · 17-12-2006, 09:07

I've just read the interview. And it's soooo just a lads mag, if she was interviewed in Heat magazine it would be totally different.
Everything she's saying is designed to sound 'sexy', like "I’d like to have cute, friendly animals around. An underwear shop on the corner."

I doubt most people would say stuff like that really, and she does come across as a bit ditzy but i don't think anyone should regard that lads mag interview as a true representation of the way she is.

Thing is with the media, they portray people by anything that they can make fit, whether it be tart, bad boy, chav etc... In Imogen's case it's gonna be tart after the video stuff.
She wants to be famous, and if a popular magazine pays her a lot of money to do that then i'd go along with it too, why not

I just don't think that interview is totally accurate, maybe the 'msn'

who interviewed her was putting words in her mouth and she was just agreeing lol.

17-12-2006, 09:21

edit deleted cuz its all bloody political

Ramrod · 17-12-2006, 12:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

However as you are well aware, my reasons for saying it wasn't her was because she had told a mutual friend she'd never do it.

......which is second hand information and practically heresay. I thought she had actually told you.....

Russ · 17-12-2006, 12:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

......which is second hand information and practically heresay. I thought she had actually told you.....

I've never said that or given that impression. In the original thread I stated repeatedly that I was told it by mutual friends. But I'm sure you know how agendas work.

TheDaddy · 17-12-2006, 12:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Russ B

I've never said that or given that impression. In the original thread I stated repeatedly that I was told it by mutual friends. But I'm sure you know how agendas work.

Makes me wonder what you have done to upset all these people, they can't all have an agenda against you surely