Eastleigh by-election battle hots up

[mertle]

anybody hear the ukip candidate last night comments about future plans. That UKIP/Conservative if ukip get sweeping seats. If cameron holds to word referendum likely they will join up for next coalition government.

If its true any Labour supporters better be more aware you shooting yourself in foot voting for UKIP.

Originally Posted by mertle

anybody hear the ukip candidate last night comments about future plans. That UKIP/Conservative if ukip get sweeping seats. If cameron holds to word referendum likely they will join up for next coalition government.

If its true any Labour supporters better be more aware you shooting yourself in foot voting for UKIP.

I do not like that. Unless of course Farage is less than off a puppy than Clegg

[mertle]

Originally Posted by tizmeinnit

I do not like that. Unless of course Farage is less than off a puppy than Clegg

Would not trust it at all to be fair. Would think as long they get there deals they will go with whatever policy conservative bring to the table. Would equally think the same for any them getting in bed with Labour.

I would also mis trust any party who thinks its good bring in disgraced Neil Hamilton into its fold.

Surely if you want to bring refreshed breath to the political system. Then stay away from disgraced MP's. How many other there brigade ex disgraced MP's.

The whole political system corrupt to core same faces just shift there aliance like the wind when they get booted out.

Hamilton's a buffoon but he knows how the system works. I can quite understand why they brought him in to their NEC. Even though he was a complete fool on QT last night. It's also worth pointing out that he was never convicted of a criminal offence, unlike a number of politicians from both sides of the House who have done bird over their expenses.

I'm all for UKIPs stance on Europe but what else can they bring to the party ?

Click my sig

[Arthurgray50@blu]

We cannot have a coalition between UKIP and the Tories, it will be worse than what it is now.

Tories is bad enough, but with UKIP it will be worse.

[dilli-theclaw]

Why, specifically, will it be worse?

Originally Posted by tizmeinnit

Click my sig

Some of it 's ok and i would support it but some i feel may be harder to do than to put in a nice shiny manifesto leaflet ,such as repealing the Human Rights Act.I think the best UKIP could or should hope for is a coalition with the conservatives

[Derek]

Originally Posted by dilligaf1701

Why, specifically, will it be worse?

Because its not labour, the only party fit to lead the country in the eyes of good ole Arthur.

Originally Posted by Derek

Because its not labour, the only party fit to lead the country in the eyes of good ole Arthur.

I would have thought Farage and Arthur would have been best buddies given that Arthur is always banging on about stuff Farage wants to do like getting out of europe ,keeping front line staff in the police and life means life etc

[Arthurgray50@blu]

Under a Labour government, it would put the working person first, yes they have borrowed vast amounts of money before, but l was watching Question Time last night and Mr Hamilton said that under the Tory party, there borrowing had trebled under the coalition, than ever did under Labour.

We need a government to run this country that is not going to there rich friends with tax breaks, and licking there lips whilst the poor suffer more and more. Since the coalition has been in power NOT one of there promises have been kept.

With UKIP, so far l have not found any truth in what they say, same as the Tories. They are a new party, so why should we believe them

Cameron said on Sky News, that the Eastleigh by election is a protest vote, l call it a kick in the teeth by finishing behind UKIP in THIRD place, yes Labour finished last, but Milliband said that they have NEVER won the seat.

[danielf]

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Since the coalition has been in power NOT one of there promises have been kept.

I think you're being a little unfair there. They said they were going to give the poor a bollocking, which they have.

Originally Posted by Derek

Because its not labour, the only party fit to lead the country in the eyes of good ole Arthur.

A lot of members have fixed views on a range of subjects not just Arthur

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu

Under a Labour government, it would put the working person first, yes they have borrowed vast amounts of money before, but l was watching Question Time last night and Mr Hamilton said that under the Tory party, there borrowing had trebled under the coalition, than ever did under Labour.

We need a government to run this country that is not going to there rich friends with tax breaks, and licking there lips whilst the poor suffer more and more. Since the coalition has been in power NOT one of there promises have been kept.

With UKIP, so far l have not found any truth in what they say, same as the Tories. They are a new party, so why should we believe them

Cameron said on Sky News, that the Eastleigh by election is a protest vote, l call it a kick in the teeth by finishing behind UKIP in THIRD place, yes Labour finished last, but Milliband said that they have NEVER won the seat.

Couple of things Arthur ,

Under 13yrs of labour rule loads of "rich friends" where created and made richer by labour and it's misuse of public funds

UKIP was founded in 1993 so hardly a new party ,not as old as labour or the tories granted but not exactly new