Fred Goodwin gets superinjunction to stop him being called a banker
21-03-2011, 11:21
|
#31
|
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 73
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,360
|
Re: Fred Goodwin gets superinjunction to stop him being called a banker
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNorm
This particular case can't "be laid soley at the feet of the media", but the general principle can. Are you surprised that well-paid lawyers are taking advantage of a legal precedent?
|
Actually I blame the judiciary and the last government for allowing it to happen on their watch.
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
21-03-2011, 11:36
|
#32
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
|
Re: Fred Goodwin gets superinjunction to stop him being called a banker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J
...allowing it to happen ....
|
What, exactly? The use of "super-injunctions", or invasion of privacy by the press?
|
|
|
21-03-2011, 11:39
|
#33
|
|
The Invisible Woman
Cable Forum Team
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: between Portsmouth and Southampton.
Age: 73
Services: VM XL TV,50 MB VM BB,VM landline, Tivo
Posts: 40,360
|
Re: Fred Goodwin gets superinjunction to stop him being called a banker
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNorm
What, exactly? The use of "super-injunctions", or invasion of privacy by the press?
|
You really think that I value the right to privacy above the right to conceal illegal activities?Get real..
__________________
Hell is empty and all the devils are here. Shakespeare..
|
|
|
21-03-2011, 12:52
|
#34
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge
Services: Sky TV, VM TV, 20meg bb, tel, and a lobster (but the lobster died).
Posts: 4,349
|
Re: Fred Goodwin gets superinjunction to stop him being called a banker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maggy J
You really think that I value the right to privacy above the right to conceal illegal activities?...
|
Well it doesn't have to be an "either/or" situation, does it?
Surely the laywers could write a law that prohibited the exposure of personal details of individuals, unless this was in the public interest.
I still maintain that Great British Red-top Journalists led us down this path. Shame on them, and all who pay their salaries.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54.
|