The gender ideology thread

[Carth]

Fads come and go, there's always been something going on that people want to hang onto the coat tails of until it gets forgotten about for the latest 'new' thing to get involved with.

The trouble is that nowadays there's an electronic/digital trail that leads back to all those bandwagons you now wish you'd never bothered to jump on.

[pip08456]

Originally Posted by Carth

Fads come and go, there's always been something going on that people want to hang onto the coat tails of until it gets forgotten about for the latest 'new' thing to get involved with.

The trouble is that nowadays there's an electronic/digital trail that leads back to all those bandwagons you now wish you'd never bothered to jump on.

If it was a "Fad" perhaps hunderds of childeren would not have been mutilated, young girls having their breasts removed boys their bells etc etc.

It was pure child abuse.

[Sephiroth]

The 'fad' that Carth mentions is the beliefs of the lunatic element that wish to allow transgender men (who dress like women) into women's spaces.

[Carth]

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

The 'fad' that Carth mentions is the beliefs of the lunatic element that wish to allow transgender men (who dress like women) into women's spaces.

Actually, it's all the people that once wrote something on Twatter, Farcebook etc trying to be with the 'in crowd' that then try to retract it when the wind blows in a different direction.

@ pip08456 - people who think that's a good thing to do to kids want shooting.

Avarda kedavra….

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr7012ryvyyo

JK Rowling has sent a stinging response to Emma Watson after the Harry Potter actress recently spoke about their relationship and a public disagreement over the issue of gender identity.
Last week, Watson said she still loves Rowling and refuses to "cancel her out" despite their differences on the subject.
But on Monday, the author responded by saying her own feelings towards her "former friend" had soured after she says Watson publicly poured "petrol on the flames" of the debate at the peak of threats against her.
Rowling wrote on X: "Like other people who've never experienced adult life uncushioned by wealth and fame, Emma has so little experience of real life she's ignorant of how ignorant she is."

Seriously, it’s well worth reading a take-down written by a world-renowned author. It’s coldly beautiful: https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1972600904185483427

[Sephiroth]

This is the takedown I like best:

I wasn't a multimillionaire at fourteen. I lived in poverty while writing the book that made Emma famous. I therefore understand from my own life experience what the trashing of women's rights in which Emma has so enthusiastically participated means to women and girls without her privileges.

[Carth]

I read that earlier and wondered if comments would appear here.

This line probably sums up my previous post about 'fads' coming and going.

The writer added that Watson's recent declaratons of love marked a "change of tack I suspect she's adopted because she's noticed full-throated condemnation of me is no longer quite as fashionable as it was".

She certainly put her in her place, as nicely as she probably could.