General STM always enforced? - Page 20

kwikbreaks · 27-10-2013, 22:23

Only 3 - if you are that keen to block P2P surely you could do much better than that a quick google should bring up thousands.

Kushan · 27-10-2013, 22:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyday

ive reported 3 to FACT via crimestoppers in the past week. Sory but I hate P2P and copyright theft in general.

Those are mutually exclusive things.

qasdfdsaq · 27-10-2013, 22:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks

Only 3 - if you are that keen to block P2P surely you could do much better than that a quick google should bring up thousands.

tbh he seems to be a fan of reporting everybody just about everyday for everything.

Not sure what crime he's imagining this time (apparently Kushan having below "adverage" intelligence was worthy of a police report last week)...

---------- Post added at 22:49 ---------- Previous post was at 22:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks

In the sort of areas where VM are competing with FTTC I suspect that the distance from subscriber to cab isn't going to be all that great. For instance I'm ~ 300m from my FTTC cabinet and have a 60Mbps estimate. I'm actually nearer than that to the next cabinet along though. I have seen mention of someone being about a mile (iirc) from their cab but I'd lay odds that there is no cable service there.

According to Thinkbroadband the average line length across the UK is around 480m from cabinet, with 60% of lines being 500m or less.

27-10-2013, 23:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

tbh he seems to be a fan of reporting everybody just about everyday for everything

Well imature rep comments yes - don't like it don't send them!

AND why does everyone refer to me as "he" I've got women's bits!

Anyway.. I can only assume this 10/16% is so that they can see if it can cope and regain control.

---------- Post added at 23:54 ---------- Previous post was at 22:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan

Those are mutually exclusive things.

Also illegal under several different acts.

qasdfdsaq · 27-10-2013, 23:55

P2P is not illegal under any act.

Copyright "theft" via P2P is usually a civil matter, not criminal.

Chrysalis · 28-10-2013, 02:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

P2P is not illegal under any act.

Copyright "theft" via P2P is usually a civil matter, not criminal.

I think you mean copyright infringement

Theft of copyright would be actually stealing the rights.

The media industry deliberatly using wrong words seems to have rubbed off on people.

craigj2k12 · 28-10-2013, 02:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan

Those are mutually exclusive things.

No they arent, they can, and do happen. They are, however, independent

---------- Post added at 02:58 ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyday

Also illegal under several different acts.

What, sharing files you own the rights to via P2P is illegal? News to me

Kushan · 28-10-2013, 08:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyday

Also illegal under several different acts.

P2P is illegal, is it? You'd best get reporting, then. Last I checked, Skype uses P2P technology. As does Spotify (for its desktop player). Many games uses P2P for updates (World of Warcraft being a prime example). Hell, even twitter uses P2P in their server infrastructure. Best get FACT on the case, they're obviously unaware of all these infringements!

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go download the rights to Disney so I can build my own theme park.

---------- Post added at 08:31 ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k12

No they arent, they can, and do happen. They are, however, independent

Ah yes, sorry you're correct on that one. What I meant to say was that P2P is not synonymous with copyright infringement.

General Maximus · 28-10-2013, 08:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go download the rights to Disney so I can build my own theme park

talking about that, I read a an article a couple of weeks ago that Disney are doing a massive expansion over the next 4 years to add an Avatar world to the theme park, it looks amazing.

http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2013/1...w-avatar-land/

Take a look at pic 4, if you want to try and built it first please do, I can't wait.

kwikbreaks · 28-10-2013, 08:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq

According to Thinkbroadband the average line length across the UK is around 480m from cabinet, with 60% of lines being 500m or less.

Probably so but my point is that VM do not operate UK wide they operate in areas of high population density and I suspect that in those areas the average subscriber to cabinet distance is going to be less than the nationwide average.

Kushan · 28-10-2013, 09:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus

talking about that, I read a an article a couple of weeks ago that Disney are doing a massive expansion over the next 4 years to add an Avatar world to the theme park, it looks amazing.

http://www.foxnews.com/travel/2013/1...w-avatar-land/

Take a look at pic 4, if you want to try and built it first please do, I can't wait.

That does look pretty good! I think I'll wait until they're finished with it, then download it for myself

kwikbreaks · 28-10-2013, 09:31

You'll need a pretty big 3D printer

That'll be the next big copyright infringement area I reckon.

28-10-2013, 12:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kushan

P2P is illegal, is it? You'd best get reporting, then. Last I checked, Skype uses P2P technology. As does Spotify (for its desktop player). Many games uses P2P for updates (World of Warcraft being a prime example). Hell, even twitter uses P2P in their server infrastructure. Best get FACT on the case, they're obviously unaware of all these infringements!

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go download the rights to Disney so I can build my own theme park.

---------- Post added at 08:31 ---------- Previous post was at 08:25 ----------

Ah yes, sorry you're correct on that one. What I meant to say was that P2P is not synonymous with copyright infringement.

No I meant copyright theft via P2P and you dam well knew that.

kwikbreaks · 28-10-2013, 12:55

Theft?

I think you meant copyright infringement as has already been pointed out.

Anyway reporting sites that list trackers and the like is a waste of time. As I said way back they are 10 a penny and a google search will reveal thousands. Do you really think you are the only person who found these sites? I'd be mildly interested to find out how and why you did.

I rather think though that you didn't and your main reason for posting was to produce exactly what has followed. Please go trolling elsewhere.

Kushan · 28-10-2013, 12:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by everyday

No I meant copyright theft via P2P and you dam well knew that.

I didn't, actually, because what you said directly implied that P2P was just as bad as "copyright theft". Otherwise, why on earth would you hate it so?

As someone has already pointed out, Copyright theft has nothing to do with P2P anyway, perhaps you mean copyright infringement, which is a completely different thing.

In any case, I suggest you get off your high-horse.