Slooow BB - Page 2

downquark1 · 14-10-2003, 20:52

For more information, the .com thread is full (of complaints mostly)
http://www.nthellworld.com/forum/sho...9&page=1&pp=30

downquark1 · 14-10-2003, 20:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

lol....just tried it......even worse....back to origional settings

Did you close and re-open Internet explorer?

**Maggy** · 14-10-2003, 20:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

lol....just tried it......even worse....back to origional settings

but it worked for me.Sorry it's not helped you.

Ramrod · 14-10-2003, 20:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1

Did you close and re-open Internet explorer?

mmm....makes it a bit faster

Ramrod · 14-10-2003, 21:08

Then again:
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:06:47 UTC
1st 128K took 1021 ms = 128376 Bytes/sec = approx 1068 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 3114 ms = 42091 Bytes/sec = approx 350 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 3766 ms = 34804 Bytes/sec = approx 290 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 17976 ms = 7291 Bytes/sec = approx 61 kbits/sec

and:
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:10:02 UTC
1st 128K took 791 ms = 165704 Bytes/sec = approx 1379 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 3415 ms = 38381 Bytes/sec = approx 319 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 14691 ms = 8922 Bytes/sec = approx 74 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1072 ms = 122269 Bytes/sec = approx 1017 kbits/sec

and I'm on 1mb

Saneboy13 · 14-10-2003, 21:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1

There is nationwide DNS problems

It is on the NTL status site, but I'm getting SERVER TOO BUSY from them at the moment

downquark1...where did you get the info. on the nationwide DNS problem
I have been using my pc all night, and I ain't had a hic-up:p

downquark1 · 14-10-2003, 21:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod

Then again:
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 21:06:47 UTC
1st 128K took 1021 ms = 128376 Bytes/sec = approx 1068 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 3114 ms = 42091 Bytes/sec = approx 350 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 3766 ms = 34804 Bytes/sec = approx 290 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 17976 ms = 7291 Bytes/sec = approx 61 kbits/sec
and I'm on 1mb

My speeds are fine. As far as I know DNS shouldn't affect bandwidth speed (only the time to make the initial contact) I think you may have a different problem there.

downquark1 · 14-10-2003, 21:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saneboy13

downquark1...where did you get the info. on the nationwide DNS problem
I have been using my pc all night, and I ain't had a hic-up:p

Quote:

Scheduled Maintenance w/c 13/10/03
As part of the ongoing project to maintain and upgrade our cable network, there is a requirement to carry out work on components which may result in a loss of service for the duration of the work.

On the morning of Tuesday 14th October between midnight and 6am, the following work will take place:-

New ntl:Home broadband customers attempting to register for the service will be unable to complete registration during this time due to essential database maintenance.

Maintenance on our DNS platform may result in degraded dns performance during the maintenance window. This may result in slow access to web pages, email and other services utilising dns.

ntl:Home Broadband customers in the Ware, Southampton, Derby, Port Talbot, Newark, Huddersfield, Stockton, Eastwood and Luton may lose service for approximately 30 minutes.

On the morning of Tuesday the 14th, Wednesday 15th and Thursday the 16th October between midnight and 6am, ntl:Home Broadband customers nationwide may lose service briefly due to network optimisation and configuration changes.

Please accept our apologies for any inconvenience these planned works may cause.

Ramrod · 14-10-2003, 21:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1

My speeds are fine. As far as I know DNS shouldn't affect bandwidth speed (only the time to make the initial contact) I think you may have a different problem there.

nooooo, don't say that! It was fine earlier!

-edit-
now it says thisTue, 14 Oct 2003 21:13:26 UTC
1st 128K took 881 ms = 148776 Bytes/sec = approx 1238 kbits/sec
2nd 128K took 1051 ms = 124712 Bytes/sec = approx 1038 kbits/sec
3rd 128K took 1062 ms = 123420 Bytes/sec = approx 1027 kbits/sec
4th 128K took 1081 ms = 121251 Bytes/sec = approx 1009 kbits/sec

Saneboy13 · 14-10-2003, 21:15

That was last night....or the early hours of this morning. It's a process that NTL do every week, if they need to re-balance upstreams, or re-segment the routers

downquark1 · 14-10-2003, 21:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saneboy13

That was last night....or the early hours of this morning. It's a process that NTL do every week, if they need to re-balance upstreams, or re-segment the routers

Well their fault site is down so I couldn't get an update.

Otherwise see here:
http://www.nthellworld.com/forum/showthread.php?t=47769

Saneboy13 · 14-10-2003, 21:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by downquark1

Well their fault site is down so I couldn't get an update.

Otherwise see here:
http://www.nthellworld.com/forum/sh...69&page=1&pp=30

Thank you for that, but I don't need to use those sorts of things

, I kinda have my own way of finding things out....kinda inside track, if you get my drift

**Chris** · 14-10-2003, 21:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by dellwear

Try the Demon DNS I'm using, its really fast no, shockingly!

aye caarumba ... I haven't seen web pages load so fast in months! Thanks for that dell.

Shaun · 14-10-2003, 21:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by towny

aye caarumba ... I haven't seen web pages load so fast in months! Thanks for that dell.

I know its so cool

downquark1 · 14-10-2003, 21:36

Superb quote over at .com

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autekre

You're just paying for the connection, dns is a free extra