Forum Articles
  Welcome back Join CF
You are here You are here: Home | Forum | BT or not BT, that is the question

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most of the discussions, articles and other free features. By joining our Virgin Media community you will have full access to all discussions, be able to view and post threads, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own images/photos, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please join our community today.


Welcome to Cable Forum
Go Back   Cable Forum > Virgin Media Services > Virgin Media Internet Service
Register FAQ Community Calendar

BT or not BT, that is the question
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31-10-2011, 23:21   #16
Matthew
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 36
Posts: 2,031
Matthew has reached the bronze age
Matthew has reached the bronze ageMatthew has reached the bronze ageMatthew has reached the bronze ageMatthew has reached the bronze ageMatthew has reached the bronze ageMatthew has reached the bronze ageMatthew has reached the bronze age
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

I would recommend looking at PlusNet as an ISP, cannot fault them.
__________________
Matt
Matthew is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Old 01-11-2011, 15:51   #17
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Well, it sounds like someone is frying an egg on my phone line. VM reckon its the filter and are sending me another one. I spoke to a guy from BT too he said he could hear the racket on the line and that I should contact Virgin about it. I'm still getting a devastatingly speedy 1.2mbps. YAWN. I mean, it's making all my pron look jerky (well, even more jerky if you know what I mean )

Let's face it, I'm doomed aren't I?

STOP PRESS: 1.92Mbps! I am rockin'

yawn.
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 16:31   #18
kwikbreaks
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: May 2010
Services: Plusnet FTTC, FoxSat HDR for TV, Vonage VOIP.
Posts: 2,082
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
kwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze agekwikbreaks has reached the bronze age
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Try turning off the router and either do a quiet line test (dial 17070 and option 2 iirc) or simply dial a 0. You should get something pretty close to silence. If you try that again with the router powered up and hear noise then it's either a duff filter (rule out by swapping it for another one) or a type of line fault known as a high resistance disconnect - a bad joint which is acting as a rectifier and converting the ADSL RF signal to one you can hear on the line.

I had one of those. 5 Openreach callouts (I just called it in as a voice fault) and no fix despite them claiming to have replaced every line segment back to the exchange. The last bloke spotted it as an ADSL issue and said pursue it through the ISP. They were useless - applied a huge target noise margin slowing the BB down to a crawl (and having zero effect on the noise) then sending out a replacement router to my old address. I lost the will to let them continue guessing and moved to cable instead.
kwikbreaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2011, 21:53   #19
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Thanks for the posts everyone. Yep kwikbreaks, turned off the router and did the quiet line test and all was quiet. Turned router back on and the fuzz returned. I'm hoping the replacement filter that's on its way will do the trick. The high resistance disconnect thing sounds scarier.

If VM will give me the cable, I'll dig up the pavement myself rather than put up with this service; it's like the dark ages.

Accessed an image heavy site today. I hope we don't have any cold callers tonight as I have a baseball bat looking to thwack something...
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 10:44   #20
Chrysalis
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,047
Chrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronzeChrysalis is cast in bronze
Chrysalis is cast in bronze
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
I think the reluctance may have been on VM's part, as they would have to pay Openreach for the call-out.

In the past, with BT for phone and VM for ADSL, I would always resolve ADSL issues by calling BT and complaining about crackle on the line during voice calls, seeing as the two always go hand in hand around here anyway.

BT would send someone out very quickly and once they got to work on the line, any audible crackle and ADSL issues would get dealt with at the same time.
Now days they will do a remote test, and if it passes then they will say if we send someone out there is a fee (over £100) unless they find a fault. Nice detterrent.
Chrysalis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2011, 15:27   #21
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrysalis View Post
Now days they will do a remote test, and if it passes then they will say if we send someone out there is a fee (over £100) unless they find a fault. Nice detterrent.
To be fair, VM warned me about that. They said there were a few things that had to be tried (changing filter, checking socket) before BT were asked to check the line. If they come and the basic tests have not been done, they will sting you big time.

Got an over 2Mbps connection today; if it carries on like this the sky's the limit (no pun intended).
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2011, 16:59   #22
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

No sign of the promised replacement filter yet.
Phone line still making a demented ssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh sound.
Connection speed is consistently less than 2.5Mbps.

I never thought the day would come when I would be hoping and praying for the 6.5Mbps I was told I would get before I signed up for Virgin National.

Seriously, this is useless. I can fart stronger than this connection .
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2011, 15:35   #23
Slef
Inactive
 
Slef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Norwich
Posts: 25
Slef is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

why wait for vm to send you a filter? Nip down to the local pooter shop (or even pcworld!) and buy one!! or even think about popping on a filtered faceplate ....that way you can pick a good quality filter

Just my humble thoughts
Andy
Slef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-11-2011, 00:22   #24
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slef View Post
why wait for vm to send you a filter? Nip down to the local pooter shop (or even pcworld!) and buy one!! or even think about popping on a filtered faceplate ....that way you can pick a good quality filter

Just my humble thoughts
Andy
Yep, fair point Andy. It's just that VM said they'd send me a new filter and a faceplate so I thought I'd wait. The guy I spoke to in tech seemed on the ball so I thought the wait might not be too long. May have to revert to Plan B for expediency though. Ta.
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14-11-2011, 08:01   #25
7031
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: at my desk
Services: 100Mbit Broadband
Posts: 95
7031 is on a distinguished road7031 is on a distinguished road
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

I will say, Virgin National may have improved, but back when I used it, well, it was quite horribly slow. I would be lucky to exceed 2Mbps on my line, despite by line having since worked fine at around 14Mbps with BE.

Having said that, Virgin cable has been great so far.
7031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2011, 00:00   #26
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by 7031 View Post
I will say, Virgin National may have improved, but back when I used it, well, it was quite horribly slow. I would be lucky to exceed 2Mbps on my line, despite by line having since worked fine at around 14Mbps with BE.

Having said that, Virgin cable has been great so far.
Well, my 'improved' connection never exceeds 2.5Mbps. The VM cable service was always good for me to be fair.

When I was younger we'd use a couple of tin cans and a piece of taut string as a crude communications device. It was more effective than VM adsl

Latest test: Overall Average Speed = approx 1720 Kbps, 1.68 Mbps
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2011, 07:51   #27
Chris
Trollsplatter
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,048
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

What's the actual sync speed on your connection, Kursk?
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2011, 09:49   #28
Kursk
-.- ..- .-. ... -.-
 
Kursk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Island of Strangers
Posts: 2,957
Kursk has disabled reputation
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris View Post
What's the actual sync speed on your connection, Kursk?
Downstream is 2854 Kbps;Upstream is 671 Kbps Chris.
Kursk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2011, 09:53   #29
7031
Inactive
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: at my desk
Services: 100Mbit Broadband
Posts: 95
7031 is on a distinguished road7031 is on a distinguished road
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Hmm, mind posting your ADSL router stats? They may help us find out what the actual issue is with your connection.
7031 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-11-2011, 10:03   #30
Chris
Trollsplatter
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: North of Watford
Services: Humane elimination of all common Internet pests
Posts: 38,048
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Chris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden auraChris has a golden aura
Re: BT or not BT, that is the question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursk View Post
Downstream is 2854 Kbps;Upstream is 671 Kbps Chris.
Seeing up to 2.5Mb download speed is consistent with that downstream sync. That's not congestion, it's the physical limitations of the line between yourself and the exchange.

Do you have a rough idea of the distance to the exchange?
Chris is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:35.


Server: osmium.zmnt.uk
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum