28-10-2010, 11:40
|
#16
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Liverpool, Merseyside
Services: Gig1 Fibre, 2x360 Box, Maxit TV, Sky Sports UHD.
Posts: 44
|
Re: 52,000
Well exactly mersey70 for 12 months i don't think virgin have done bad and the 38% we have may just tell virgin for more hd channels but even on sky if you had the packages you still have to pay £10 a month for hd and the figures are good for us i do think
|
|
|
28-10-2010, 19:40
|
#17
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Services: Sky Stream
Posts: 342
|
Re: 52,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad
Also to say Virgin didn't advertise SKY Premium HD when it arrived 2 months ago simply isn't true.
|
I saw an advert while playing Fight Night Round 4 online
|
|
|
12-11-2010, 10:04
|
#18
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Coventry
Services: Virgin Media 1TB TiVo, 500Gb TiVo, TV XL, 60Mb Broadband, Phone
Posts: 1,508
|
Re: 52,000
Heh, more Virgin customers signed up for Sky Premium HD content than BT Vision customers signed up for Sky Sports!
http://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/bt-...da79363e3.html
|
|
|
12-11-2010, 13:08
|
#19
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,567
|
Re: 52,000
10% of their install base though. That's no too bad going considering it's a **** service.
|
|
|
12-11-2010, 13:31
|
#20
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 182
|
Re: 52,000
Research by Neilsen shows BT spent £6.3m on its Sky Sports campaign in the three months to the end of September, compared to BSkyB's £13.7m and Virgin Media's £700,000.
With contracts starting at just £6.99 a month, BT signed up around 50,000.
Sky refused to comment on the number of Sky Sports customers they added (or lost).
Virgin Media added over 100,000 Sky Sports and/or Sky Movies subscribers.
|
|
|
12-11-2010, 13:53
|
#21
|
|
Inactive
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wirral
Services: TV M, L BB, Sky+ HD
Posts: 1,485
|
Re: 52,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDon
10% of their install base though. That's no too bad going considering it's a **** service.
|
I had BTV before joining VM and thought it was excellent. The box was great, much nicer UI and far faster than the V+, the on demand content was refreshed more frequently too. Unfortunately it was too expensive when you factored in the phone and BT broadband connection which for me was excellent too. I personally think BTV has the edge on VM with their on demand content, however when you then also consider all the many more linear channels on cable then VM (XL anyway) offers better value overall, in my opinion.
I wouldn't hesitate to recommend both services.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:05.
|