[Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
09-05-2006, 23:24
|
#2671
|
Oh Lanky Lanky.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,038
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzae
Because the players have food prepared especially for them.
|
When you think of some of the more bizarre things that have happened due to far eastern betting scams, that would be a more likely candidate than an Ar5e connection.
Who's floodlights nearly got sabotaged a few years back with the help of a corrupt club official at the behest of a Malaysian or other betting fix?
|
|
|
09-05-2006, 23:28
|
#2672
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,411
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzae
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ D
Well this is just speculation, but what if someone in the kitchen added something to the food when it was decided what the whole team were going to have?
|
Still seems very far fetched to me, as Jeff Stelling said on Sunday "It's Dream Team stuff."
Spurs nutritional staff advised chefs at the Marriot on the meals, you would imagine they would also supervise the cooking to ensure everything was cooked correctly.
I think Jol said he doesn't think it was foul play.
|
I read this but I can't remember where. Probably the newspaper.
Apparently (take this as nothing more than a rumour) the Marriott until 18 months ago, was so worried about the safety of its minced beef that that guests ordering med-rare burgers had to sign a legal disclaimer - which was scrapped after negative publicity.
The same article said that even if the tests proved the food made the players ill, then it would still be difficult to prove that this caused Spurs' losses. Ie difficult.
Just having a look through the paper now to try and find it.
---------- Post added at 23:28 ---------- Previous post was at 23:24 ----------
Just found it. Mail, p7.
|
|
|
09-05-2006, 23:45
|
#2673
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belfast
Age: 45
Posts: 4,594
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
Who's floodlights nearly got sabotaged a few years back with the help of a corrupt club official at the behest of a Malaysian or other betting fix?
|
Derby and West Ham wasn't it?
|
|
|
09-05-2006, 23:55
|
#2674
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,411
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzae
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
Who's floodlights nearly got sabotaged a few years back with the help of a corrupt club official at the behest of a Malaysian or other betting fix?
|
Derby and West Ham wasn't it?
|
That was funny.
|
|
|
10-05-2006, 00:18
|
#2675
|
cf.mega pornstar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 19,156
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
but what if it was foul, fowl play, funny how the only people affected where players, apparently.
|
They were not the only ones apparently Martin Jol and Chris Houghton both had a dose to.
|
|
|
10-05-2006, 00:28
|
#2676
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,411
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDaddy
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
but what if it was foul, fowl play, funny how the only people affected where players, apparently.
|
They were not the only ones apparently Martin Jol and Chris Houghton both had a dose to.
|
Jol looked a bit green in the face it had to be said. As for Hughton you just can't tell.
|
|
|
10-05-2006, 12:09
|
#2677
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bromley
Age: 47
Posts: 2,688
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
still abit upset about the result.. if we had taken our chances in the first half at home we would have been three -nil up.. didn't defend well and watford scored when they had chances.. our heads dropped in the first lef after their goal and we never got back in the tie
can't see watford beating leeds though
has anyone noticed that when a manager is sent off he just goes up to the stands now and gets his phone out so not alot changes.. some managers even watch from the stands anyway
if a manager is to be sent off they need to go to a room with no TV or access to anyone and do the same thing if they are banned for the next match.. rememer Jose and the Bayern game and the bloke on the bench with the hat to ocer the earpiece.. not really a punishment with all the technology we have today..
this makes interesting reading on Walcott
http://football.guardian.co.uk/world...770802,00.html
as i said he hasn't been tested by anyone world class and got marked out of a championship game at QPR
|
|
|
10-05-2006, 22:30
|
#2678
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belfast
Age: 45
Posts: 4,594
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Premier League replies to Spurs, they wanted a replay because two first teamers were sick!
Quote:
Over the course of the following hour, the Board gathered its facts and gave the matter due consideration. It concluded the following:
1) It was satisfied that the following significant facts pertained:
· 6 players had been confirmed as having suffered from either sickness and/or diarrhoea (S & D) that morning
· 2 other players had felt unwell but had not suffered from S & D
(These facts were established by Jane Purdon in consultation with the THFC Doctor)
|
Quote:
Of the six players confirmed with S & D, only two were in the starting eleven for your last three Premier League matches.
|
|
|
|
10-05-2006, 23:22
|
#2679
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,411
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
I still think it was more than six according to press reports:
Davids - played 90
Dawson - played 90
Keane - played 90
Carrick - went off ill 62
Lennon - played 90
Tainio - played 87
Barnard - played 14
Davenport - played 3
Cerny - dnp
Huddlestone - dnp
were affected.
Spurs XVIs for the last three games:
v W Ham: Robinson ,Kelly ,Dawson ,Gardner ,Lee (Barnard ,78 ) ,Lennon ,Carrick (Reid ,63 ) ,Davids ,Tainio (Davenport ,87 ) ,Keane ,Defoe
Subs not used Cerny,Murphy,
v Bolton: Robinson ,Stalteri ,Lee ,Dawson ,Gardner ,Murphy (Davenport ,86 ) ,Tainio ,Carrick ,Lennon ,Keane (Barnard ,45 ) ,Defoe (Reid ,78 )
Subs not used: Cerny,Huddlestone,
v Arsenal: Robinson ,Stalteri ,Dawson ,Gardner ,Lee ,Lennon (Murphy ,77 ) ,Carrick ,Davids (sent off 85),Tainio ,Defoe ,Keane
Subs not used Cerny,Naybet,Kelly,Barnard,
Affected players in Bold.
Either this is being misreported by the media or the PL have it wrong. Carrick went off with stomach cramps (and actually threw up in the tunnel) and Dawson looked iller than usual. As for Keane well he looked a bit off colour too.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 00:01
|
#2680
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belfast
Age: 45
Posts: 4,594
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
According to the letter the facts on numbers who were ill were obtained after consultation with the Spurs team doctor.
I forgot the link in my earlier post, here it is...
http://www.premierleague.com/fapl.ra...tfa_breadcrumb
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 00:07
|
#2681
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,411
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by gazzae
|
Yeah I read it there too. The media must have it wrong.
Therefore - from seeing extended highlights of the game, and from the alleged list which is all we have to go on, and Jol's interviews the two players MUST be Dawson and Carrick.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 09:30
|
#2682
|
Oh Lanky Lanky.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire.
Services: 2 TV 360 boxes. 500mb BB, Phone line.
Posts: 8,038
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Rumoured on 5Live this morning that it may not be food poisoning but a virus.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 09:43
|
#2683
|
Guest
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
Rumoured on 5Live this morning that it may not be food poisoning but a virus.
|
possibly misleading, as one of the most common causes of food poisoning is a virus
http://www.nnuh.nhs.uk/viewLeaflet.asp?ID=71
basically there are two main kinds of 'food poisoning', one is caused by being infected with bacteria or viruses, which multiply in the body & cause the symptoms, the other is caused by eating food in which bacteria have already been growing & excreted toxins. The main difference is that the first type can take a while to 'incubate', while the second is likely to have a more rapid effect.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 12:08
|
#2684
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chavvy Nottingham
Age: 41
Services: Freeview, Sky+, 100 Mb/s VM BB, mega i7 PC, iPhone 13, Macbook Air
Posts: 7,411
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
Quote:
Originally Posted by iadom
Rumoured on 5Live this morning that it may not be food poisoning but a virus.
|
The fact they all went down with it together would possibly make that less likely. Unless they caught it from a common source.
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 12:16
|
#2685
|
Inactive
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,291
|
Re: [Merged] The Football Thread 2005/2006 Season
maybe the affected players indulged in a dodgy spit roast the night before?
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:34.
|